I interviewed Moore in March 2022, when I had 1700 subscribers. For this post, I integrated him with the Rockefeller story and am republishing it for my current 22,000 readers.
glyphosate is inactivated by chlorine dioxide, and since anyone who eats wheat gets it in huge quantities, we should all be taking CD. My urine levels are in the highest 25 percent
I don’t know where to get it. I have some three year old two bottle and mix stuff but even tho I’m a health care practitioner and do lots of science experiments, I find that confusing.
Thanks for getting this comment in first. You are right about glyphosate, and others have objected to Moore's reassurances about plastics. These days, every side of every debate seems to have been bought off in a massive attempt to confuse and dishearten us. The environmentalists are on the wrong side of many stories, and the climate change thing is a clear psyop. Reflecting on this, I have been fooled again. I may dissect the issues in a subsequent post. Best, and thanks.
I corrected this post as follows by putting this note at the top:
Yoho note: The video above was from several years ago before I understood how globalists were guiding us over a cliff for “population control.” I republished it this time before looking at it again. When prompted to review it by the comments after the post dropped, I realized Moore was a limited hangout. Glyphosate is a toxin that psychopaths developed to damage us, and he is telling half-truths about plastics as well. I do not think Moore is proud of what he says because he has never responded since the original interview to my emails.
The interview above is an outline of Dr. Moore’s book. If you think I should delete the video, let me know. I am leaving it up because a lot of it is accurate, stimulates discussion, and makes me think.
I’m a grateful paid subscriber and I always read your posts first. My wife is a homeopath and in our 42 years she’s opened my eyes to many things. I believe you’re either establishing or tapping in to a community of people who want to grow, learn and seek truth. I grow through every mistake, especially the embarrassing ones. Keep it up, we’ve got your back.
My question for the climate change folks is to see where they stand on regenerative agriculture. I personally don’t think co2 is such a big deal but regenerative agriculture is the best solution and one that has many other benefits. If regenerative agriculture isn’t front and center, then I know they’re selling something.
thanks, I got it the first time and missed it for this post, sorry. I think his lies were limited to glyphosate, GMOs, and plastics, but let me know if there was more. The slides in the main body of the post seemed balanced.
I think readers will be fascinated by this old news story. About eugenics. Involving Rockefeller, Bernays and a fascinating list of VIPs at a eugenics play in 1913:
Choosing Audience for Brieux Play
JD Rockefeller, Jr Suggests Those Who Have Aided White Slave Investigation
Social Workers Approve
Think the Drama Will Impress the Moral of Eugenics - Proceeds for Education
"White Slavery" was the term for human trafficking, prostitution. The objective of the play was to stop wealthy men of privileged genes from sleeping around with lower class women, breeding with them. No mixing of the high class gene pools with lower classes. Eugenics. Population control. "Evolutionary Design."
But the real story in this is who the VIP's are. Next comment.
- Edward Bernays, father of modern propaganda, advertising. Both Joseph Goebbels and Madison Avenue, informed by his teachings. Coined the phrase "quack medicine" to discredit natural healers. Successfully.
- Simon and Abraham Flexner. Authors of the "Flexner Report." Used by legislators and congress to criminalize natural healers, put natural healing schools out of business, asserted allopathic (western) medicine as the only real "evidence-based" healing, effectively killing homeopathy, herbalism and naturopathy:
- Rabbi Stephen S Wise. He is an enigma. He was the Jesse Jackson of American Jewry in the first half of the 20th century. A Zionist who's early work to establish a Jewish homeland in the British Palestine Mandate eventually led to the establishment of the State of Israel. He was FDR's most senior Jewish influencer. Did a lot of good for Jews. But...he also was who helped conceal the true horrors of the Holocaust from FDR and the public, and opposed efforts to expose it. I found this Wikipedia write up on him interesting. Particularly the section "Criticism":
And Rabbi Wise was an ardent eugenicist. One of the early faith leaders to advance it. As highlighted in the following book link. It's not to say that Rabbi Wise supported the Holocaust. But it shows how even Jews can co-author their own holocaust with their grandiose ideas about "fixing" mankind:
Preaching Eugenics: Religious Leaders and the American Eugenics Movement
"She specifically documents how Protestant, Jewish, and a limited number of Catholic religious leaders contributed to making American eugenics the foremost eugenics movement in the world by the 1920s and sought the creation of a 'good society" in America by means of those methods that the eugenics movement advocated: sterilization, immigration restriction, incarceration, intelligence testing, and statistical analysis applied to the racial/ethnic/genetic backgrounds of families."
"The American eugenics movement became the model used by Adolf Hitler and the Nazis, who turned their zealousness for eugenics as the means of preserving the health of the nation into, first, the murder of the disabled, and, subsequently, the brutalization and murder of millions of innocent men, women, and children in the final solution."
Both Rabbi Leon Harrison of Temple Israel in St. Louis and Rabbi Stephen Wise publicly expressed opposition to intermarriage, but some Reform rabbis objected. The advocates of intermarriage did not view Jews as a race, while the opponents did (pp. 106-7). In 1915, Rabbi Max Reichler (1886-1957) wrote an essay seeking to reconcile the divergent views and reconcile Judaism with eugenics."
"Rabbi Wise subsequently followed Rabbi Reichler s lead in seeking accommodation (pp. 108-9). In the same way that Protestants and some Catholics had come to support eugenics, Jews also came to be numbered among the advocates of the movement in the early twentieth century."
- William J Schieffelin - Descendant of John Jay, first Supreme Court Chief Justice of the US. Family owned the oldest pharmaceutical company in the US, headed up early Big Pharma trade association. Eugenicist:
- Paul U Kellogg - another enigma. He is the father of the modern "Social Justice" movement. And supported eugenics. But it's hard to reconcile with his work to help blacks and other minorities. I suppose someone can be a eugenicist without being a racist. Just get rid of the undesirables, disabled, antisocials without regard to race?:
- Yale University Civics Club. Prescott Bush, father of George HW Bush was a student at Yale in 1913. And had been president of his high school civics club in 1912. His family was already tight with the Rockefeller's, his father, Samuel Bush, worked for Frank Rockefeller, John D Rockefeller's brother. Prescott Bush was a eugenicist, who was also "Hitler's Banker." And was one of the six Yale students in attendance.
- Mrs. W K Vanderbilt. Aka Anne Harriman who married into the Vanderbilt railroad dynasty. Daughter of Oliver Harriman, from a railroad tycoon family himself, handled the finances, went into banking. Brother of Edward Harriman. Partner in bank Prescott Bush worked for as "Hitler's Banker."
Guilty. I get carried away when Bernays and Rockefeller are used in same story. That 1913 NYT article is jaw-dropping with 20-20 hindsight. And then I get going...and going...and going...
I hope there's info of value for you, others curious. We're all trying to put pieces of the puzzle together.
"Medical sociology may be traced back to the late 1800s in terms of intellectual development. Sociology and allopathic medicine, two embryonic sciences, began to make contact in modest but major ways in the late 19th century." [and the "science" of Eugenics]
Medical Sociology is also tied to Marxist "Conflict Theory":
And Medical Sociology gave rise to an organization, "Association of Internes and Medical Students," that was disbanded and scattered to other medical sociology movements after it was associated with the Red Scare during the McCarthy Anti-Communist hearings:
Valerie Jarrett, long time top advisor to Barack Obama, deemed The other side of Obama's brain," her father was a leading member of AIMS. And a eugenicist:
Edward Bernays, often hailed as the “father of public relations,” is a fascinating figure whose influence on the art of persuasion is undeniable. Born in 1891 in Vienna and later relocating to the United States, Bernays was ahead of his time, drawing on psychological principles—many of which were inspired by his famous uncle, Sigmund Freud—to shape public opinion and consumer behavior.
Bernays understood that the public is susceptible to influence, and he cleverly harnessed this understanding to create groundbreaking PR campaigns that left a lasting mark. One of his most controversial yet impactful initiatives was branding women’s smoking as a liberating act, coining the term “torches of freedom” to promote cigarettes as a symbol of independence. He also played a significant role in establishing bacon and eggs as the quintessential American breakfast, forever changing the nation's culinary landscape.
In his 1928 book, *Propaganda*, Bernays laid out his strategies for shaping public sentiment, making it a cornerstone text for anyone interested in the realms of PR and marketing. His work paved the way for modern advertising, demonstrating how media could be utilized to mold social norms and influence consumer habits.
Yet, despite his successes, Bernays’ methods have sparked critical discussions about ethics in public relations. His tendency to prioritize persuasion over transparency raises important questions about the responsibility that comes with such powerful tools of influence. Bernays’ legacy is a blend of innovation and controversy, still relevant in today's fast-paced media landscape.
More Bernays-inspired eugenics: "Gender-affirming care" is a Madison Avenue ad agency makeover of landmark eugenics sterilization case Buck v. Bell, 8-1 majority decision that said "three generations of imbeciles is enough" upholding mandatory sterilization of undesirables. Cited by defendants at Nuremberg, "But you Americans do it, too, what's the big deal?" They were right.
Still standing law. But modified in Skinner v Oklahoma to include consent element. However coerced and manipulated it may be gained. Enter the Madmen --->"gender affirming care" marketing campaign for the 'consensual' sterilization of imbeciles.
Medical doctors now leading the charge for the 'civil right' of imbeciles to be sterilized. Eugenics starts and ends with Rockefeller "health."
Whoa, how can one be a eugenicist without being a racist? They want to destroy people based on some aspect of some group or race. I would have to ponder that statement.
Yep, I had to double take that myself. Reading a bit about each of the invitees, their values, most make sense. That seeming contradiction stands out, hard to reconcile with how we think of the subject.
Did he believe the best of any race belong in the gene pool? Did he have a soft spot, like, say, see them as a favorite pet to tend to and care for?
Interesting! The battle vs. Alternative practitioners included Chiropractic. It was many generations before I started practicing that DCs were being imprisoned.
Yep. Even within Chiropractic there’s the old traditionalist practitioners and the more medical hybrid practitioners. Not all wanted to adopt the medicalization for licensure of it. Same phenomenon happening in Naturopathy, Homeopathy, Ayurveda, Asian modalities. All have practitioners trying to incorporate “Evidence-Based Medicine” concepts of health on top of their traditional alternative practices. They lose what makes them distinct and better alternatives, imho.
The mistake is making believe that healing is a science. Health is an individual concern. Maybe science, "EBM" can get 80% of the healing process calculated into a scientific proposition. Maybe. Big maybe. But each of us has the other 20% that isn't possible to calculate in a scientific equation, because we have individual health systems going on inside our bodies that defy scientific precision. That's where the *art* of healing comes in. Art. Individual tastes, ideas, definition behind what is art. Not one-size-fits-all. Can't be "EBM'd." The alternative fields have a lot of crossover, different terminology, variations, but more in tune with how our bodies (and minds) interplay with the natural world we live in harmony with. How we restore that harmony when we're out of balance with it. That's art, not science.
I'll take my chances with a healing artist before I turn to a medical "scientist" exactly 100% of the time for dis-ease, chronic illness, etc. I do my research to determine if I appreciate a particular artist's work or not. Only time I'd consider a medical scientist is for trauma, car accident internal injuries and deep flesh wounds, gun/knife wounds, broken bones. Medical care that involves butchery and invasive repairs. Pretty much just when a butcher's skills are needed. Definitely not for dis-ease.
"Our protocols of antisocialization to "stop the spread" of dis-ease disrupted and devastated so many lives that we now have a big substance abuse problem. So we have to design better psychological coping behavioral programs to help mitigate the disruptions and devastations we caused with our massive antisocialization campaign." (My translation of their 'scientific' study)
Instead of just not disrupting and devastating lives pretending to "slow the spread" in the first place.
This is the poster child of "EBM" medical 'science.' That treats the symptoms, not the source of dis-ease.
Dr Moore's take on GMO is completely ignorant. The weeds are becoming resistant to all the glyphosate pesticides as well as newer combined pesticides. Its a completely failed paradigm. Glyphosate is an antibiotic (damaging our microbiome), a chelator (binding necessary minerals), it interferes with the Shikimate pathway, it damages our gut tight junctions causing dysbiosis. They are creating soil that is concrete. More pesticides is not the answer!!! Regenerative agriculture is the answer. You should have Joe Salatin on for an interview. He would sink Dr Moore's BS.
Glyphosate is essential amino acide glycine that has been bastardized with a phosphate group. When it is incorporated into a protein it causes that protein to misfold and become disfunctional.
Golden rice produced minimal amounts of beta carotene, not enough to make a difference. A few green leaves produce so much more beta carotene. You could hand out a few vitamin pills for pennies.
Thanks! I have a single Moringa tree that could provid a whole village enough vitamin A, along with C, Bs, amino acids, etc, etc. GMOs are a solution looking for (and creating) a problem. They dont live up to the hype. They were supposed to reduce pesticide usage and instead its use has skyrocketed, and ultimately they are failing with resistant superweeds.
It’s almost impossible to keep up with the information that’s hitting us these days. Much of it is instinctive and it feels like it is the truth and some of it is simply amazing ! I’m concerned how to incorporate God in all this .
Monsanto was able to get away with the development of Round Up because glyphosate studies did not show specific affects on human health (this has been contested). But it is generally known that the microbiome can be disrupted in humans, leading to an array of health conditions. It is difficult to stay away from ingesting or breathing in Glyphosate. Most of the patient's that I have tested (sick people) are in at least the 80 th percentile for exposure to it.
My understanding is Monsanto - the company which had the patent on Round up/glyphosate and a clear conflict of interest- did a 90 day feeding study (using Round up on their GM corn) to determine the effects of glyphosate on health and the environment before asking for approval from the FDA in 1974. The FDA (which we know has been corrupt and in the pocket of Big Pharma and Big Ag for many decades) approved it against the many concerns of the agencies own scientists, who stated 3 months was not nearly long enough to determine any deleterious effects it would have on humans, other species and the environment and who strongly cautioned the FDA that there needed to be a much longer study before releasing it into the food supply (the GM corn) or the environment. Money talks. Always follow the money.
I agree with most of what he’s saying. However, my aunt owned (for decades) many acres of wheat downwind of Hanford Nuclear Plant in Walla Walla WA. She said there were lots of “radiated rabbits” from the nuclear waste contamination of the Columbia River where they get their irrigation water. I wish I had thought to ask how she knew? Now’s she’s long dead. Maybe the truth is somewhere in the middle?
Might be an example of hormesis, but it would be a very low dose such as with one tooth. I can barely see a spinal x-ray of any type being hermetic. The interstitial tissue is very capable and actually does capture x-ray frequencies which can be destructive tot he body.
There are nuclear reactors called fast reactors that use molten lead as a coolant instead of water, and recycle nuclear waste by using spent uranium – the vast majority (94%) being uranium- and plutonium as fuel. These are mostly used in other countries (France, Germany, Russia and the UK while a few others have prototypes or plans to build them- the US being one that has several fast reactor designs using different coolants, including molten salt, that are under development.)
There was no measurement of the radiation released from 3 Mile Island nuclear plant accident near Hershey Pennsylvania (enjoy your chocolate). So no one knows what mortality occurred. It came very close to a melt down. Light Water Reactors are a terrible technology. The metals in the plants are embrittled by the radiation, risking ruptures. There is much safer better nuclear tech. We should be shutting down LWRs and building Thorium or other nuclear technologies.
Microplastics are being found in our food - animal and plant! Plastics have phthalates that are endocrine disrupters. It is certainly toxic. The Materials Safety Data sheet on phthalates says Suspected of causing cancer. May damage fertility or the unborn child. May be fatal if swallowed and enters airways.
My guess its contributing greatly to gender dysphoria, along with all the other endocrine disruptors we are dumping in our food and water - PCBs, Atrazine, etc, etc..
To dismissiely say plastics are non-toxic because we cover our food to protect them from germs is willful (deliberate?) ignorance. Has Dr Moore ever heard of Cancer Alley in Louisiana where all the oil refineries and chemical plants are located? Most of our epidemic of cancers (prior to Covid vacs) were around our chemical industries. Plastics are a big part of that.
LWRs were developed in the Cold War in large part because the military wanted to make bombs from the Plutonium byproduct of the Uranium fission, not because it was a better technology for civilian power production. So now we not only have dangerous reactors, we have cooling tanks full of "spent" Uranium contaminated with Plutonium which could be used for a dirty bomb and cant be discarded and must be cooled for the next 450,000 years (half life of plutonium). They say it can be turned into glass but No one wants it in their back yard. And of course we have to include the dangers of mining Uranium and what it does to the poor communities in the surrounding area, that breath the radioactive tailings dust.
Bring on Hargraves who wrote the book, "Thorium, Energy Cheaper than Coal" (also extremely clean and safe). Its a very inspiring book. He is much more informed on nukes than Dr Moore. Btw the Chinese are hoping to harvest a mineral (Helium/Hydrogen ?) on the dark side of the Moon that could provide nuclear power for their economy for centuries. No plans for that in the West.
No. I think the photographic evidence makes it pretty clear we didnt get there with a manned landing. Those fotos were staged. Just like the un-manned Chinease mission to the dark side of the moon, what landed on the moon from the US space program was probably unmanned.
The neo-Malthusians in power in the West have stopped investing in nuclear technologies including fusion tech. But our existing LWR tech is a disaster waiting to happen. We could easily have a meltdown with massive radiation release upwind of one of our cities that would be a disaster. Loss of coolant would cause the core to melt down to groundwater which would cause a massive steam explosion breaching the containment dome. Even without a meltdown, they still cant enter the Fukishima plants because the radiation levels are too high. All the robots they send in to investigate die in short order from the intense radioactivity. They have just dumped all the accumulated radioactive emergency cooling water into the ocean to unknown effect (probably not much but who really knows). Meanwhile China is developing better nuclear tech. Have a guest on who can intelligently discuss nuclear technologies.
Thank you. I don’t trust anything he says. I am aware that some of it is absolutely true but he’s got some agenda here. Not good to let him have time to continue spreading nonsense, we are done with this. It’s time for truth. I’m glad I didn’t buy his book.
Summer of 1974. 220 miles south of north pole. No ice. Same in the 80s 120 miles south of north pole. Alert NW territories. My friend went for a cold swim. In fact it was in a harbour. Winter 1982. Ice. Solid. 25 years in the Canadian military as a meteorologist. Same rhing every year. Worked in the Navy and air force. Climate change is bs.
I used reference materials in the late 90s for weather forcasting that were written in the 20s.
Lol. They use this canard all the tjme. There is a storm. Climate change. They start forest fires, climate change. Repeatedly telling the masses it is hot. Etc etc etc. Destroying centuries of weather data is a sign it is a lie.
Wm Engdhal would make a great interview. He has written a great series of books, "Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation", "Gods of Money: Wall Street and the Death of the American Century", "A Century of War: : Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order", "Myths, Lies and Oil Wars", "Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order"
Or you could have Jeffrey Smilth on who wrote "Seeds of Deception: Exposing Industry and Government Lies About the Safety of the Genetically Engineered Foods You're Eating"
Or bring on Dr Seneff author of "Toxic Legacy: How the Weedkiller Glyphosate Is Destroying Our Health and the Environment". She is an MIT professor who has devoted many years now to investigating glyphosate. Any one of them would give a more nuanced understanding of what genetic modification and glyphosate are doing to our food and health.
Dont you remember the studies that Seralini did with rats fed either GMO or glyphosate corn? He used the exact same strain of rats that Monsanto used to "prove" their GMO corn was safe, but he ran the study for many months instead of the 90 days that Monsanto did. His gmo and glyphosate fed rats developed all sorts of horrible cancers that the control group didnt. Of course he was viciously attacked by the industry hacks. He repeated the study to address the critics, and got the same results. That Dr Moore ignores this makes me very suspicious of him.
Yes and more. I’ve seen the studies showing how GMOs widen the gut to such extremes that it widens the entire torso. That’s why so many people are more than obese. I know the studies On this one.
This was very interesting but I’m not aware that Roundup is harmless and GMOs are fine. I need more information about this before I can accept his quick statement.
I agree with you about his statements about gmo’s & plastics. The environmental/climate change/carbon info was illustrated by his research but then it appears he’s just made general statements where I don’t believe he has expertise. How does he know that our overuse of gmo’s & plastics is not harming us biologically? The recent Calley & Casey Means interviews & the subsequent roundtable of health experts(??) by Senator Ron Johnson was in complete disagreement with his statements. I’m not saying who is right or wrong (I’m just confused), but he did not present evidence to support his claims.
Gregg Braden has been talking about this and more for at least 8 years now. 5000 years ago we had the same type of cyclic climate change, the last time it was hotter. We have not created it! Gregg knows the answers to what this green peace man does not know the answers to, please take the time to interview him.
the best presentation I have seen so far was on CERES by Willie Soonhttps://www.ceres-science.com/post/ddp-july-2024?postId=66d2d5ca-1fb0-4941-84a2-cc4413f740bd&utm_campaign=2288cafc-8f7e-444f-b8aa-e6adc8c17df2&utm_source=so&utm_medium=mail&utm_content=c0f9c215-e833-43a1-a1d1-9a604a674876&cid=089338df-792c-40ff-96d5-c6de38a64aa5
And here is Climate the moviehttps://climatethemovie.net/
Stephanie Seneff is an excellent lecturer/writer. One believes her. Jay Feldman espouses ideas about hormesis that I tend towards. Sounds like he would be interesting to hear from.
He lost me at "plastics are good for the ocean" and "I am not going to drink glyphosate because it is not a beverage, but it is perfectly safe." Well, then. Drink it for science? If I was trying to assure the world that glyphosate was perfectly safe, I would have absolutely NO problem chugging it down, even if it tasted like rotten sewage. This not a serious answer as to why he wouldn't drink it. It's a lame excuse in my opinion. If he isn't going to drink it, what studies is he basing his assessment on?
Please consider inviting Stephanie Senneff on to site studies on the harms of glyphosate in humans.
GMO's are generally a horrible idea for many reasons, one of which is that they are primarily crops used for cheap, low quality, ultra processed foods. But increased pesticide and herbicide use is clearly carcinogenic to the people eating these foods.
One thing to ask yourself while listening to someone like this is, if he is correct, we should all be getting healthier with the increased chemicals, GMO's, plastic in the ocean, etc. But we aren't.
I do think he makes good points about carbon dioxide. Carbon trading seems to be a money scam imposed on us by the elite. But caring about chemicals in the environment is actually what they seem to be distracting us from buy focusing on the carbon neutral thing.
'Better living through science' is taking us down strange and unknown roads and our children are showing some of the effects of it.
Did you ask him about MRNA? Did I miss that? Would be interesting to hear his opinion on that.
Jay Feldman of Jay Feldman Wellness is a very interesting health enthusiast/researcher that has completely disavowed the theory that harmful things are good for us in certain doses. He thinks hormesis is just an excuse made for chemical companies to pollute and get away with it (that's my view of his take on the theory, which fits well with this guest). He would be another great guest. He studies Ray Pete's work and helps people embrace a carbohydrate-rich diet to help keep the cells machinery healthy so that are weight can stabilize while eating a natural diet without denying ourselves of calories all the time. It's more complicated than that but I find it an excellent theory to live by and have gained many benefits, including not having to starve myself of things that my body is telling me to eat.
You are right, and I put the reasons why I agree in the first comment. Thanks for watching out for us. Stephanie Senneff is the brightest person in any room, and I have written about glyphosate before and mentioned her work.
Glyphosate has been described as an antibiotic. Putting glyphosate on the soil damages or destroys the microbiome of the soil.
The jury on the lawsuit against Monsanto on behalf of a groundskeeper harmed by glyphosate decided to award the victims over 2 billion dollars.
Not sure about his other statements but he’s either lying or ignorant about glyphosate. Now I can’t trust anything else he says.
glyphosate is inactivated by chlorine dioxide, and since anyone who eats wheat gets it in huge quantities, we should all be taking CD. My urine levels are in the highest 25 percent
I don’t know where to get it. I have some three year old two bottle and mix stuff but even tho I’m a health care practitioner and do lots of science experiments, I find that confusing.
I have all the info about that in the top paragraph of each post now.
Best and let us know how you do.
Thanks for getting this comment in first. You are right about glyphosate, and others have objected to Moore's reassurances about plastics. These days, every side of every debate seems to have been bought off in a massive attempt to confuse and dishearten us. The environmentalists are on the wrong side of many stories, and the climate change thing is a clear psyop. Reflecting on this, I have been fooled again. I may dissect the issues in a subsequent post. Best, and thanks.
I corrected this post as follows by putting this note at the top:
Yoho note: The video above was from several years ago before I understood how globalists were guiding us over a cliff for “population control.” I republished it this time before looking at it again. When prompted to review it by the comments after the post dropped, I realized Moore was a limited hangout. Glyphosate is a toxin that psychopaths developed to damage us, and he is telling half-truths about plastics as well. I do not think Moore is proud of what he says because he has never responded since the original interview to my emails.
The interview above is an outline of Dr. Moore’s book. If you think I should delete the video, let me know. I am leaving it up because a lot of it is accurate, stimulates discussion, and makes me think.
I’m a grateful paid subscriber and I always read your posts first. My wife is a homeopath and in our 42 years she’s opened my eyes to many things. I believe you’re either establishing or tapping in to a community of people who want to grow, learn and seek truth. I grow through every mistake, especially the embarrassing ones. Keep it up, we’ve got your back.
My question for the climate change folks is to see where they stand on regenerative agriculture. I personally don’t think co2 is such a big deal but regenerative agriculture is the best solution and one that has many other benefits. If regenerative agriculture isn’t front and center, then I know they’re selling something.
Related: I visited Polyface Farms (https://polyfacefarms.com)
and apparently the owner Joel has some sort of new appointment in the Trump admin.
If you saw “What Happened To The Wheat”, I think that’s the name, you surely understand how badly he lied.
thanks, I got it the first time and missed it for this post, sorry. I think his lies were limited to glyphosate, GMOs, and plastics, but let me know if there was more. The slides in the main body of the post seemed balanced.
I think readers will be fascinated by this old news story. About eugenics. Involving Rockefeller, Bernays and a fascinating list of VIPs at a eugenics play in 1913:
Choosing Audience for Brieux Play
JD Rockefeller, Jr Suggests Those Who Have Aided White Slave Investigation
Social Workers Approve
Think the Drama Will Impress the Moral of Eugenics - Proceeds for Education
New York Times, Sunday, February 23,1913, Page 13
https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-new-york-times-edward-l-bernays-m/31090629/
"White Slavery" was the term for human trafficking, prostitution. The objective of the play was to stop wealthy men of privileged genes from sleeping around with lower class women, breeding with them. No mixing of the high class gene pools with lower classes. Eugenics. Population control. "Evolutionary Design."
But the real story in this is who the VIP's are. Next comment.
- JD Rockefeller.
- State Senator Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
- Edward Bernays, father of modern propaganda, advertising. Both Joseph Goebbels and Madison Avenue, informed by his teachings. Coined the phrase "quack medicine" to discredit natural healers. Successfully.
- Simon and Abraham Flexner. Authors of the "Flexner Report." Used by legislators and congress to criminalize natural healers, put natural healing schools out of business, asserted allopathic (western) medicine as the only real "evidence-based" healing, effectively killing homeopathy, herbalism and naturopathy:
https://ac.news/the-1910-flexner-report-rockefellers-corporate-illusionists-create-foundation-and-framework-for-sick-care-medicine-over-a-century-ago/
- Rabbi Stephen S Wise. He is an enigma. He was the Jesse Jackson of American Jewry in the first half of the 20th century. A Zionist who's early work to establish a Jewish homeland in the British Palestine Mandate eventually led to the establishment of the State of Israel. He was FDR's most senior Jewish influencer. Did a lot of good for Jews. But...he also was who helped conceal the true horrors of the Holocaust from FDR and the public, and opposed efforts to expose it. I found this Wikipedia write up on him interesting. Particularly the section "Criticism":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Samuel_Wise
And Rabbi Wise was an ardent eugenicist. One of the early faith leaders to advance it. As highlighted in the following book link. It's not to say that Rabbi Wise supported the Holocaust. But it shows how even Jews can co-author their own holocaust with their grandiose ideas about "fixing" mankind:
Preaching Eugenics: Religious Leaders and the American Eugenics Movement
https://sci-hub.se/https://www.jstor.org/stable/42944393
"She specifically documents how Protestant, Jewish, and a limited number of Catholic religious leaders contributed to making American eugenics the foremost eugenics movement in the world by the 1920s and sought the creation of a 'good society" in America by means of those methods that the eugenics movement advocated: sterilization, immigration restriction, incarceration, intelligence testing, and statistical analysis applied to the racial/ethnic/genetic backgrounds of families."
"The American eugenics movement became the model used by Adolf Hitler and the Nazis, who turned their zealousness for eugenics as the means of preserving the health of the nation into, first, the murder of the disabled, and, subsequently, the brutalization and murder of millions of innocent men, women, and children in the final solution."
Both Rabbi Leon Harrison of Temple Israel in St. Louis and Rabbi Stephen Wise publicly expressed opposition to intermarriage, but some Reform rabbis objected. The advocates of intermarriage did not view Jews as a race, while the opponents did (pp. 106-7). In 1915, Rabbi Max Reichler (1886-1957) wrote an essay seeking to reconcile the divergent views and reconcile Judaism with eugenics."
"Rabbi Wise subsequently followed Rabbi Reichler s lead in seeking accommodation (pp. 108-9). In the same way that Protestants and some Catholics had come to support eugenics, Jews also came to be numbered among the advocates of the movement in the early twentieth century."
- William J Schieffelin - Descendant of John Jay, first Supreme Court Chief Justice of the US. Family owned the oldest pharmaceutical company in the US, headed up early Big Pharma trade association. Eugenicist:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Jay_Schieffelin
https://sci-hub.st/https://doi.org/10.1002%2Fjps.3080161113
- Abraham Jacobl, the first leading pediatrician, president of the American Medical Association. and a leading eugenicist:
https://stanforddaily.com/2019/11/18/eugenics-on-the-farm-ray-lyman-wilbur/
- Paul U Kellogg - another enigma. He is the father of the modern "Social Justice" movement. And supported eugenics. But it's hard to reconcile with his work to help blacks and other minorities. I suppose someone can be a eugenicist without being a racist. Just get rid of the undesirables, disabled, antisocials without regard to race?:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_U._Kellogg
- Yale University Civics Club. Prescott Bush, father of George HW Bush was a student at Yale in 1913. And had been president of his high school civics club in 1912. His family was already tight with the Rockefeller's, his father, Samuel Bush, worked for Frank Rockefeller, John D Rockefeller's brother. Prescott Bush was a eugenicist, who was also "Hitler's Banker." And was one of the six Yale students in attendance.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar
https://books.google.com/books?id=sQSvBYR0xKUC&pg=PT35&lpg=PT35&dq=%22prescott+bush%22+%22civics+club%22&source=bl&ots=y-gQTD9psX&sig=ACfU3U3mzt2Pd8cwb_q4hMGqry9k-rz8rA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiumLiu1sqEAxVwHNAFHViyBqIQ6AF6BAgJEAM#v=onepage&q=%22prescott%20bush%22%20%22civics%20club%22&f=false
- Mrs. W K Vanderbilt. Aka Anne Harriman who married into the Vanderbilt railroad dynasty. Daughter of Oliver Harriman, from a railroad tycoon family himself, handled the finances, went into banking. Brother of Edward Harriman. Partner in bank Prescott Bush worked for as "Hitler's Banker."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anne_Harriman_Vanderbilt
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Kissam_Vanderbilt
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_Harriman
But wait, there's more! Next comment.
this is a post not a comment!!
Guilty. I get carried away when Bernays and Rockefeller are used in same story. That 1913 NYT article is jaw-dropping with 20-20 hindsight. And then I get going...and going...and going...
I hope there's info of value for you, others curious. We're all trying to put pieces of the puzzle together.
Of note, another invitee, sponsor was the American Society on Medical Sociology.
Medical Sociology. Are you familiar with it? Obama's top advisor Valerie Jarrett is.
"Medical Sociology.":
https://www.sociologygroup.com/medical-sociology/
"Medical sociology may be traced back to the late 1800s in terms of intellectual development. Sociology and allopathic medicine, two embryonic sciences, began to make contact in modest but major ways in the late 19th century." [and the "science" of Eugenics]
Medical Sociology is also tied to Marxist "Conflict Theory":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_theories
And Medical Sociology gave rise to an organization, "Association of Internes and Medical Students," that was disbanded and scattered to other medical sociology movements after it was associated with the Red Scare during the McCarthy Anti-Communist hearings:
"Association of Internes and Medical Students":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_of_Internes_and_Medical_Students (AIMS)
AIMS helped midwife Disease Politics:
https://academic.oup.com/jhmas/article/74/2/127/5481292
Valerie Jarrett, long time top advisor to Barack Obama, deemed The other side of Obama's brain," her father was a leading member of AIMS. And a eugenicist:
https://www.judicialwatch.org/communism-in-jarretts-family/
The rabbit hole just gets deeper and deeper.
Edward Bernays, often hailed as the “father of public relations,” is a fascinating figure whose influence on the art of persuasion is undeniable. Born in 1891 in Vienna and later relocating to the United States, Bernays was ahead of his time, drawing on psychological principles—many of which were inspired by his famous uncle, Sigmund Freud—to shape public opinion and consumer behavior.
Bernays understood that the public is susceptible to influence, and he cleverly harnessed this understanding to create groundbreaking PR campaigns that left a lasting mark. One of his most controversial yet impactful initiatives was branding women’s smoking as a liberating act, coining the term “torches of freedom” to promote cigarettes as a symbol of independence. He also played a significant role in establishing bacon and eggs as the quintessential American breakfast, forever changing the nation's culinary landscape.
In his 1928 book, *Propaganda*, Bernays laid out his strategies for shaping public sentiment, making it a cornerstone text for anyone interested in the realms of PR and marketing. His work paved the way for modern advertising, demonstrating how media could be utilized to mold social norms and influence consumer habits.
Yet, despite his successes, Bernays’ methods have sparked critical discussions about ethics in public relations. His tendency to prioritize persuasion over transparency raises important questions about the responsibility that comes with such powerful tools of influence. Bernays’ legacy is a blend of innovation and controversy, still relevant in today's fast-paced media landscape.
More Bernays-inspired eugenics: "Gender-affirming care" is a Madison Avenue ad agency makeover of landmark eugenics sterilization case Buck v. Bell, 8-1 majority decision that said "three generations of imbeciles is enough" upholding mandatory sterilization of undesirables. Cited by defendants at Nuremberg, "But you Americans do it, too, what's the big deal?" They were right.
Still standing law. But modified in Skinner v Oklahoma to include consent element. However coerced and manipulated it may be gained. Enter the Madmen --->"gender affirming care" marketing campaign for the 'consensual' sterilization of imbeciles.
Medical doctors now leading the charge for the 'civil right' of imbeciles to be sterilized. Eugenics starts and ends with Rockefeller "health."
Whoa, how can one be a eugenicist without being a racist? They want to destroy people based on some aspect of some group or race. I would have to ponder that statement.
Yep, I had to double take that myself. Reading a bit about each of the invitees, their values, most make sense. That seeming contradiction stands out, hard to reconcile with how we think of the subject.
Did he believe the best of any race belong in the gene pool? Did he have a soft spot, like, say, see them as a favorite pet to tend to and care for?
Yes, makes us ponder.
Interesting! The battle vs. Alternative practitioners included Chiropractic. It was many generations before I started practicing that DCs were being imprisoned.
Yep. Even within Chiropractic there’s the old traditionalist practitioners and the more medical hybrid practitioners. Not all wanted to adopt the medicalization for licensure of it. Same phenomenon happening in Naturopathy, Homeopathy, Ayurveda, Asian modalities. All have practitioners trying to incorporate “Evidence-Based Medicine” concepts of health on top of their traditional alternative practices. They lose what makes them distinct and better alternatives, imho.
I see these fields as coming together in many of their modalities
The mistake is making believe that healing is a science. Health is an individual concern. Maybe science, "EBM" can get 80% of the healing process calculated into a scientific proposition. Maybe. Big maybe. But each of us has the other 20% that isn't possible to calculate in a scientific equation, because we have individual health systems going on inside our bodies that defy scientific precision. That's where the *art* of healing comes in. Art. Individual tastes, ideas, definition behind what is art. Not one-size-fits-all. Can't be "EBM'd." The alternative fields have a lot of crossover, different terminology, variations, but more in tune with how our bodies (and minds) interplay with the natural world we live in harmony with. How we restore that harmony when we're out of balance with it. That's art, not science.
I'll take my chances with a healing artist before I turn to a medical "scientist" exactly 100% of the time for dis-ease, chronic illness, etc. I do my research to determine if I appreciate a particular artist's work or not. Only time I'd consider a medical scientist is for trauma, car accident internal injuries and deep flesh wounds, gun/knife wounds, broken bones. Medical care that involves butchery and invasive repairs. Pretty much just when a butcher's skills are needed. Definitely not for dis-ease.
How allopathic medicine "science" problem solves:
Trends in Alcohol Use After the COVID-19 Pandemic:
A National Cross-Sectional Study
https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/ANNALS-24-02157
"Our protocols of antisocialization to "stop the spread" of dis-ease disrupted and devastated so many lives that we now have a big substance abuse problem. So we have to design better psychological coping behavioral programs to help mitigate the disruptions and devastations we caused with our massive antisocialization campaign." (My translation of their 'scientific' study)
Instead of just not disrupting and devastating lives pretending to "slow the spread" in the first place.
This is the poster child of "EBM" medical 'science.' That treats the symptoms, not the source of dis-ease.
Excellent reply.!
Or killed
Dr Moore's take on GMO is completely ignorant. The weeds are becoming resistant to all the glyphosate pesticides as well as newer combined pesticides. Its a completely failed paradigm. Glyphosate is an antibiotic (damaging our microbiome), a chelator (binding necessary minerals), it interferes with the Shikimate pathway, it damages our gut tight junctions causing dysbiosis. They are creating soil that is concrete. More pesticides is not the answer!!! Regenerative agriculture is the answer. You should have Joe Salatin on for an interview. He would sink Dr Moore's BS.
Glyphosate is essential amino acide glycine that has been bastardized with a phosphate group. When it is incorporated into a protein it causes that protein to misfold and become disfunctional.
Golden rice produced minimal amounts of beta carotene, not enough to make a difference. A few green leaves produce so much more beta carotene. You could hand out a few vitamin pills for pennies.
I could not have responded better myself!
Thanks! I have a single Moringa tree that could provid a whole village enough vitamin A, along with C, Bs, amino acids, etc, etc. GMOs are a solution looking for (and creating) a problem. They dont live up to the hype. They were supposed to reduce pesticide usage and instead its use has skyrocketed, and ultimately they are failing with resistant superweeds.
Dr Moore should stick to climate issues, where he is absolutely right on. The rest of his rant is BS. Get people who know these issues.
it's more nuanced than that
What is?
It’s almost impossible to keep up with the information that’s hitting us these days. Much of it is instinctive and it feels like it is the truth and some of it is simply amazing ! I’m concerned how to incorporate God in all this .
It’s God who is enabling us to see the truth!
Loved your presentation although I can’t
wrap my head around the Monsanto
Round Up being safe… what about causing lymphoma etc…?
You are right, and I modified the post. Please see my response to the first comment. I forgot to listen to this again before posting.
Best
Monsanto was able to get away with the development of Round Up because glyphosate studies did not show specific affects on human health (this has been contested). But it is generally known that the microbiome can be disrupted in humans, leading to an array of health conditions. It is difficult to stay away from ingesting or breathing in Glyphosate. Most of the patient's that I have tested (sick people) are in at least the 80 th percentile for exposure to it.
My understanding is Monsanto - the company which had the patent on Round up/glyphosate and a clear conflict of interest- did a 90 day feeding study (using Round up on their GM corn) to determine the effects of glyphosate on health and the environment before asking for approval from the FDA in 1974. The FDA (which we know has been corrupt and in the pocket of Big Pharma and Big Ag for many decades) approved it against the many concerns of the agencies own scientists, who stated 3 months was not nearly long enough to determine any deleterious effects it would have on humans, other species and the environment and who strongly cautioned the FDA that there needed to be a much longer study before releasing it into the food supply (the GM corn) or the environment. Money talks. Always follow the money.
I agree with most of what he’s saying. However, my aunt owned (for decades) many acres of wheat downwind of Hanford Nuclear Plant in Walla Walla WA. She said there were lots of “radiated rabbits” from the nuclear waste contamination of the Columbia River where they get their irrigation water. I wish I had thought to ask how she knew? Now’s she’s long dead. Maybe the truth is somewhere in the middle?
all he said was that low levels of radiation were hermetic. This is seen in x ray exposures too.
Might be an example of hormesis, but it would be a very low dose such as with one tooth. I can barely see a spinal x-ray of any type being hermetic. The interstitial tissue is very capable and actually does capture x-ray frequencies which can be destructive tot he body.
all true
Thanks for the clarification
I'm chagrined with my other mistakes here.
There are nuclear reactors called fast reactors that use molten lead as a coolant instead of water, and recycle nuclear waste by using spent uranium – the vast majority (94%) being uranium- and plutonium as fuel. These are mostly used in other countries (France, Germany, Russia and the UK while a few others have prototypes or plans to build them- the US being one that has several fast reactor designs using different coolants, including molten salt, that are under development.)
There was no measurement of the radiation released from 3 Mile Island nuclear plant accident near Hershey Pennsylvania (enjoy your chocolate). So no one knows what mortality occurred. It came very close to a melt down. Light Water Reactors are a terrible technology. The metals in the plants are embrittled by the radiation, risking ruptures. There is much safer better nuclear tech. We should be shutting down LWRs and building Thorium or other nuclear technologies.
Microplastics are being found in our food - animal and plant! Plastics have phthalates that are endocrine disrupters. It is certainly toxic. The Materials Safety Data sheet on phthalates says Suspected of causing cancer. May damage fertility or the unborn child. May be fatal if swallowed and enters airways.
My guess its contributing greatly to gender dysphoria, along with all the other endocrine disruptors we are dumping in our food and water - PCBs, Atrazine, etc, etc..
To dismissiely say plastics are non-toxic because we cover our food to protect them from germs is willful (deliberate?) ignorance. Has Dr Moore ever heard of Cancer Alley in Louisiana where all the oil refineries and chemical plants are located? Most of our epidemic of cancers (prior to Covid vacs) were around our chemical industries. Plastics are a big part of that.
thanks and I'm stuck looking into all this now because I posted this wrong content. Plastics have been on my radar.
Sounds good! An expert on endocrine disruptors would be very interesting.
LWRs were developed in the Cold War in large part because the military wanted to make bombs from the Plutonium byproduct of the Uranium fission, not because it was a better technology for civilian power production. So now we not only have dangerous reactors, we have cooling tanks full of "spent" Uranium contaminated with Plutonium which could be used for a dirty bomb and cant be discarded and must be cooled for the next 450,000 years (half life of plutonium). They say it can be turned into glass but No one wants it in their back yard. And of course we have to include the dangers of mining Uranium and what it does to the poor communities in the surrounding area, that breath the radioactive tailings dust.
Bring on Hargraves who wrote the book, "Thorium, Energy Cheaper than Coal" (also extremely clean and safe). Its a very inspiring book. He is much more informed on nukes than Dr Moore. Btw the Chinese are hoping to harvest a mineral (Helium/Hydrogen ?) on the dark side of the Moon that could provide nuclear power for their economy for centuries. No plans for that in the West.
So you believe we have been to the moon and that it is technically feasible?
No. I think the photographic evidence makes it pretty clear we didnt get there with a manned landing. Those fotos were staged. Just like the un-manned Chinease mission to the dark side of the moon, what landed on the moon from the US space program was probably unmanned.
The neo-Malthusians in power in the West have stopped investing in nuclear technologies including fusion tech. But our existing LWR tech is a disaster waiting to happen. We could easily have a meltdown with massive radiation release upwind of one of our cities that would be a disaster. Loss of coolant would cause the core to melt down to groundwater which would cause a massive steam explosion breaching the containment dome. Even without a meltdown, they still cant enter the Fukishima plants because the radiation levels are too high. All the robots they send in to investigate die in short order from the intense radioactivity. They have just dumped all the accumulated radioactive emergency cooling water into the ocean to unknown effect (probably not much but who really knows). Meanwhile China is developing better nuclear tech. Have a guest on who can intelligently discuss nuclear technologies.
Thank you for spreading truth.
Thank you. I don’t trust anything he says. I am aware that some of it is absolutely true but he’s got some agenda here. Not good to let him have time to continue spreading nonsense, we are done with this. It’s time for truth. I’m glad I didn’t buy his book.
agree.
I can make it make sense. The Rockefellers are Satanic, they worship Satan. Search for the book Bloodlines of Illuminati and you will find a link to it in the CIA Library. Or just click on this link: https://www.cia.gov/library/abbottabad-compound/FC/FC2F5371043C48FDD95AEDE7B8A49624_Springmeier.-.Bloodlines.of.the.Illuminati.R.pdf
Summer of 1974. 220 miles south of north pole. No ice. Same in the 80s 120 miles south of north pole. Alert NW territories. My friend went for a cold swim. In fact it was in a harbour. Winter 1982. Ice. Solid. 25 years in the Canadian military as a meteorologist. Same rhing every year. Worked in the Navy and air force. Climate change is bs.
I used reference materials in the late 90s for weather forcasting that were written in the 20s.
using stories of the past 50 years has no relevance for geologic time
Lol. They use this canard all the tjme. There is a storm. Climate change. They start forest fires, climate change. Repeatedly telling the masses it is hot. Etc etc etc. Destroying centuries of weather data is a sign it is a lie.
Its a myth that oil is a fossil fuel. It has been found in geologic levels below life.
https://www.amazon.com.mx/Myths-Lies-Oil-Wars-English-ebook/dp/B00DJUTH4I
The Soviet Union drilled deeper and found it.
Wm Engdhal would make a great interview. He has written a great series of books, "Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation", "Gods of Money: Wall Street and the Death of the American Century", "A Century of War: : Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order", "Myths, Lies and Oil Wars", "Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order"
Or you could have Jeffrey Smilth on who wrote "Seeds of Deception: Exposing Industry and Government Lies About the Safety of the Genetically Engineered Foods You're Eating"
Or bring on Dr Seneff author of "Toxic Legacy: How the Weedkiller Glyphosate Is Destroying Our Health and the Environment". She is an MIT professor who has devoted many years now to investigating glyphosate. Any one of them would give a more nuanced understanding of what genetic modification and glyphosate are doing to our food and health.
Dont you remember the studies that Seralini did with rats fed either GMO or glyphosate corn? He used the exact same strain of rats that Monsanto used to "prove" their GMO corn was safe, but he ran the study for many months instead of the 90 days that Monsanto did. His gmo and glyphosate fed rats developed all sorts of horrible cancers that the control group didnt. Of course he was viciously attacked by the industry hacks. He repeated the study to address the critics, and got the same results. That Dr Moore ignores this makes me very suspicious of him.
Yes and more. I’ve seen the studies showing how GMOs widen the gut to such extremes that it widens the entire torso. That’s why so many people are more than obese. I know the studies On this one.
Exactly.
great stuff and I have not found the time to analyze it, although I am aware of it. I have saved it.
This was very interesting but I’m not aware that Roundup is harmless and GMOs are fine. I need more information about this before I can accept his quick statement.
He's wrong about roundup; I should have clarified.
I agree with you about his statements about gmo’s & plastics. The environmental/climate change/carbon info was illustrated by his research but then it appears he’s just made general statements where I don’t believe he has expertise. How does he know that our overuse of gmo’s & plastics is not harming us biologically? The recent Calley & Casey Means interviews & the subsequent roundtable of health experts(??) by Senator Ron Johnson was in complete disagreement with his statements. I’m not saying who is right or wrong (I’m just confused), but he did not present evidence to support his claims.
Gregg Braden has been talking about this and more for at least 8 years now. 5000 years ago we had the same type of cyclic climate change, the last time it was hotter. We have not created it! Gregg knows the answers to what this green peace man does not know the answers to, please take the time to interview him.
the best presentation I have seen so far was on CERES by Willie Soonhttps://www.ceres-science.com/post/ddp-july-2024?postId=66d2d5ca-1fb0-4941-84a2-cc4413f740bd&utm_campaign=2288cafc-8f7e-444f-b8aa-e6adc8c17df2&utm_source=so&utm_medium=mail&utm_content=c0f9c215-e833-43a1-a1d1-9a604a674876&cid=089338df-792c-40ff-96d5-c6de38a64aa5
And here is Climate the moviehttps://climatethemovie.net/
I put this in as a reference thanks Ingrid!
Stephanie Seneff is an excellent lecturer/writer. One believes her. Jay Feldman espouses ideas about hormesis that I tend towards. Sounds like he would be interesting to hear from.
He lost me at "plastics are good for the ocean" and "I am not going to drink glyphosate because it is not a beverage, but it is perfectly safe." Well, then. Drink it for science? If I was trying to assure the world that glyphosate was perfectly safe, I would have absolutely NO problem chugging it down, even if it tasted like rotten sewage. This not a serious answer as to why he wouldn't drink it. It's a lame excuse in my opinion. If he isn't going to drink it, what studies is he basing his assessment on?
Please consider inviting Stephanie Senneff on to site studies on the harms of glyphosate in humans.
GMO's are generally a horrible idea for many reasons, one of which is that they are primarily crops used for cheap, low quality, ultra processed foods. But increased pesticide and herbicide use is clearly carcinogenic to the people eating these foods.
One thing to ask yourself while listening to someone like this is, if he is correct, we should all be getting healthier with the increased chemicals, GMO's, plastic in the ocean, etc. But we aren't.
I do think he makes good points about carbon dioxide. Carbon trading seems to be a money scam imposed on us by the elite. But caring about chemicals in the environment is actually what they seem to be distracting us from buy focusing on the carbon neutral thing.
'Better living through science' is taking us down strange and unknown roads and our children are showing some of the effects of it.
Did you ask him about MRNA? Did I miss that? Would be interesting to hear his opinion on that.
Jay Feldman of Jay Feldman Wellness is a very interesting health enthusiast/researcher that has completely disavowed the theory that harmful things are good for us in certain doses. He thinks hormesis is just an excuse made for chemical companies to pollute and get away with it (that's my view of his take on the theory, which fits well with this guest). He would be another great guest. He studies Ray Pete's work and helps people embrace a carbohydrate-rich diet to help keep the cells machinery healthy so that are weight can stabilize while eating a natural diet without denying ourselves of calories all the time. It's more complicated than that but I find it an excellent theory to live by and have gained many benefits, including not having to starve myself of things that my body is telling me to eat.
Thanks for this thought provoking interview.
You are right, and I put the reasons why I agree in the first comment. Thanks for watching out for us. Stephanie Senneff is the brightest person in any room, and I have written about glyphosate before and mentioned her work.
Best