I have really enjoyed most of your emails, but when you begin belittling other people’s contributions and bad mouthing them you really make yourself look bad, and I wonder if I shouldn’t cancel you. It’s not okay to do that. I would not say that you have correct discernment.
(Name redacted)
I replied: The Freedom Movement is filled with shills and false flags paid or influenced by our enemies. I will soon post an interview with Mathew Crawford to confirm this. He is at roundingtheworld.substack.com if you want a preview. It’s a painful insight, an unfortunate black pill. Being Pollyanna about it helps no-one.
Best and thanks for your contribution, even if it turns out to be the last one. If you return, please always post in the comments so everyone can see your ideas.
It is refreshing to have a scientific discussion presented. Too many substacks propose theories without addressing a counter-explanation. That is not science, nor is it legal analysis. For the past four years - and much longer - we have been living under a system where both essential components have been stripped from analysis, meaning there is no analysis. The LCQ theory reminds me of braces or fillings amplifying AM radio waves. Surely, dentists and orthodontists did not intend for this outcome, but it occurred. So I side with George until further evidence. Even well-intentioned theories, if unfounded, add to the fog of war.
Top of the article is excellent. The last time I watched Mercola interviewed (CHD) my jaw dropped to the floor. It served as the fuel to move past both Mercola and CHD. I have noticed-- when one is focused on graphene, there is no critical thinking of known neurotoxins. An early chemical analysis of different brands and batches found various KNOWN toxins. In our current, absurd new electrical environment, the good ole' poisons is all you need to become ill. Microwave radiation and mercury interact in known ways. Any theory that is not founded on this reality raises my suspicion. If any real epidemiology was happening, there would be studies looking at the 'died suddenly' (compared to living siblings) to document ongoing poisoning, like amalgams, root canals, metal implants, piercing, tattoos, wi-fi levels, RF levels, dirty electricity level running behind the wall where they sleep, etc. in addition to vaccine schedule. I am beginning to think all the poisons (while true and definitely neurotoxic) are not only used to control the population's level of illness, but also used to engineer division among the population of the partial-awake. Where does it end? At this point, most of us who desire freedoms are arguing over details founded on wrong assumptions. To me, it is all beginning to look like layers of wrong. Thank you for the thought-provoking article.
I agree that deciding what's true is our top priority. It's important too, to separate information from the people providing it. Otherwise we risk blindly following everything someone says just because we trust them, as opposed to trusting ourselves to discern the truth.
No one is right 100% of the time. This is especially true in the health field where we're inevitably sorting through research, reports, and expertise contaminated by special interests of various kinds. Being wrong doesn't make someone a liar, though they certainly work among us. My research and experience often lead me to different conclusions than you express. Is one of us a liar? Not necessarily. But one of us definitely has better discernment or more direct relevant experience and both of us think we're that one!
I follow all kinds of people. Some because I like to identify the controlled opposition and see what they're putting out there. A distinct few because they have proven themselves adept researchers and truth tellers. They are always reader funded and have no connection to companies pushing health-care products of any kind, which makes for inevitable bias. But none of them are going to be right all the time because they're human.
But too strident. Stridency sets off my spidey sense also.
Remember the rule of three. If someone lies to you once, it could be a mistake. Lies to you twice, it could still be a misunderstanding. Three times, you are dealing with a chronic liar. Proceed accordingly.
Thanks for your opinions, most interesting and believable. You say that you have researched HRT and that it is a positive thing but you didn’t define what type of HRT. I could more readily agree with you if you were only talking about bio-identical hormones but not if you were referring to synthetic analogue hormones. I’ve had some negative experience with those both personally and professionally. I have trusted Mercola for 25 years and, like you, have been surprised at his pivots. From time to time over the years I have seen Mercola change his advice in light of new evidence and have viewed that as an indication of his honesty. However, I have never really believed in some of his more extreme recommendations and although he is only in his late 60s, a few years older than me, his appearance does not look healthy to me and I’ve often wondered about that. From my point of view, the jury is out on Mercola and I will continue to read his stuff. I find it very hard to believe that, after all these years, the powers that be have finally managed to tame him. Time will tell I suppose.
I have also been a long-time Mercola follower. I too became concerned after seeing a recent interview he did. But, my first thought was not of him being tamed, or "switching sides", but of him maybe buckling a little beneath what must be a mountain of stress from the intense and constant scrutiny. I'm just 'standing by' for now...
Chaos agents abound, as you say. Discernment is a challenge but of immense importance. Too many people are happy to accept what is asserted by what they consider "their side" without using discernment. A better approach, if you are unable to discern for yourself, is to say "I'm not sure what to believe."
For the graphene the most likely thing, besides the manufacturing defects, is simple fertility reduction. It's been Bill Gate's open agenda for his whole life, so why change now? Some additive that, in their studies, minimizes detection and lifestyle while making them more infertile.
Another good one, the mere affirmation of my thought/opinions of the mass amount questionable info helps me so much and brightens my week - your fingers on so many diverse “experts” makes you my go to substacker to slosh through this shit show clown world, a tad happier and secure in my discernment. It again, is truly comforting to find a much needed big brother from another mother. You are very much appreciated for all that you do and Thanks. Safe travels but more importantly have tons of fun!
Today Substacker Unbecoming had an interview with Timothy winey-absolutely fascinating. Hoping an interview with you to bring it down to levels of understanding of his theories/experiments of hydrophobicity, etc.
The mighty don’t want the meek to inherit earth. They are farming us like livestock, making us weak and susceptible to death. What I find interesting is the high similarity between the actions of the elites and what the Sumerian tablets tell us about the actions of the gods who they claim walked amongst them. The similarity is astounding. They are copying the Sumerian gods in an awful lot of what they do
Sitting on the internet all day every day writing and reading about what’s going on has got to stop. People seem to be trying to make a buck out of the situation rather than plan revolution. They are all hat and no cowboy.
I’m glad you have seen mercola in a different light
Revolution is the only solution and if organised well can be quick and relatively painless for everyone. It would sure beat just talking about it anyway
Thank you ever so much Dr Yoho! I am so glad you have written about Mercola! A few days ago I left a comment on one of his articles essentially giving thanks to God for his awesome creation as opposed to evolution (the article asserted that trees had changed what they were doing in order to fatten up squirrels). I was banned for doing this without any right of reply or appeal. I had apparently breached 'community guidelines', and yet I was not provided any 'community guidelines', and I was not advised of exactly how I had breached! To say I was shocked is an understatement as I have been following Mercola for 10yrs+.
FYI - This was the email I was sent...
" For over a quarter of a century, this site has aimed to equip you with information to take charge of your health. We recognize, however, that not everyone has been able to apply this knowledge personally, often due to circumstances beyond their control or responsibility. Moving forward, our focus will shift towards providing content that empowers you to make informed decisions for fostering health and joy in your life. Our goal is to foster a supportive community where everyone can safely explore and learn these principles.
Regarding your recent contribution, it does not align with our site's renewed focus, and as a result, you will be temporarily banned for one day. Should there be future posts from you that do not adhere to our guidelines, the duration of bans will increase progressively: a week for the next instance, followed by a month, three months, six months, and then a year. A violation after a one-year ban will lead to a permanent ban from the site. "
I was aghast at the condescension of the first paragraph...apparently I have not spiritually arrived - perhaps through no fault of my own. Am I misinterpreting that?
Trawling through his previous posts I found the strange one in February 24 he had written about 'refocusing' and that he has decided that he wants to provide joy to people as a priority. This was the same article that advised his followers that articles would be no longer hidden behind a paywall.
I personally happen to think the elite filth out of the UN will eventually declare Sunday as earth day and decree that everyone must 'worship' nature on this day - get involved in the paganism, worship the beast type scenario like the Bible says. I had always been worried that the natural health crowd, the Mercolas of the world, who have onboarded so many spiritualistic practices, such as Flower essences for one example, would fall for this new-age lie.
After searching a bit I too found he has been consulting with spiritualists. In Christianity we call this witchcraft. The joy Mercola feels is the pride of life, not the reverence the living God, and nothing good can come of ghosting God, and setting yourself or Demons up as the ultimate authority. One of my first thoughts in all this was...but Dr Yoho loves Dr Mercola, as do many people. I am so glad you have called out his bad behaviour, and what a hero for the ghosting stance!
Thank you! I am sorry for him, but he has allowed himself take the counsel of demons. Yes, we are all but a breath of wind. And we have a battle to fight.
1) Birds’ brains are vastly underrated. While small, they have concentrated, high amounts of neurons. I learned a lot by watching crows, chickens, peafowl, and parrots.
2) Are you familiar with Geoff Pain, PhD, who writes from Australia on Substack? He is a biochemist and has done extensive work on fluoride harms in the past, and he now writes prolifically about the Covid shot harms. He says all of the phenomena being attributed to graphene can be explained by the endotoxin contaminants of the shots.
Rather than completely ghosting people completely, I think it's better to take "what you need and leave the rest" using your discernment skills as your guide. No ONE person is a complete expert in all facets (medical, financial, governmental, legal, big pharma, environmental, etc, etc) of what's been attacked or manipulated in the last few years/decades/centuries. I do question people who seemingly turn tide to the "dark side" in mid-stream, as exhibited by our dear "Republican" Speaker of the House. He was taken into a SCIF and given, at least, a talking to before selling us out for another $100B for foreign proxy wars (with more "giving" planned for August, I hear) and NOTHING for the American people. Did MJ just change his mind after promising border funding was a hill to die on before any more funding went out of the US? Was he bribed, was his family threatened, was he threatened with "finding" child-porn on his computer? Reports are that he received a $4M campaign donation from AIPAC right before/after the vote. Then, there are others who can and have changed their thinking about vaccines and govt control (etc) just due to the happenings of the last 4 yrs because they realized that THEY had been lied to themselves for years. I also highly question people who claim to be "experts" or are put up as "experts" on several different, starkly contrasting subjects that have nothing to do with their true educational or career background. If you, a medical doctor, suddenly wrote an article advising me on legal property matters, I'm not sure I'd pay much heed without further investigation. I had a comment-exchange earlier today about this who-to-trust subject. They accused Sasha Latypova of being a liar and a level2 gatekeeper because she doesn't believe in the "Internet of Bodies", so on that point alone, he's thrown out every other thing she's said and done, along with Katherine Watt. I believe that's completely short-sighted, even to the point of being willfully blind. Sasha doesn't claim to be a networking expert (I'm not even sure I've heard her talk about that but she possibly has). I also question your heavy reliance on your ONE - "top engineer, George" although he's probably more qualified to speak on these tech topics being a "software engineer" than the "assinine chemtrails", where he was also put forth as an "expert" solely because he's been a "airplane fanatic since childhood". I still wonder what makes anonymous George considered to be a "top" engineer? Top in his company? Top in his city? Top in the country...the world? Top because you admire him? We don’t know and have no way to check besides your endorsement. This BT topic was lightly touched on back then, and I agreed with George about the BT signals - they simply don't work like they've been presented by some. But I agree because I also have a background in IT hardware and software and corporate networking so I knew how these technologies worked prior to these claims being thrown out.
I think I remember correctly, the commenters on your article about "chemtrials are assinine" were not completely impressed nor convinced by George.😕 If we used your parameters of discernment as our guide, there's many of us who would no longer be subscribed to your substack. 🤷♀️
I appreciate your seriousness and lengthy response. George is completely credible to me both for “chemtrail” and for these issues. I'll leave you to him
Good points. I can see both sides. I also understand that ghosting is a survival strategy right now, particularly for "digital soldiers" on the front lines of the information war.
9 And this I pray, that your charity may more and more abound in knowledge, and in all understanding: 10 That you may approve the better things, that you may be sincere and without offence unto the day of Christ,
FROM A READER VIA EMAIL:
I have really enjoyed most of your emails, but when you begin belittling other people’s contributions and bad mouthing them you really make yourself look bad, and I wonder if I shouldn’t cancel you. It’s not okay to do that. I would not say that you have correct discernment.
(Name redacted)
I replied: The Freedom Movement is filled with shills and false flags paid or influenced by our enemies. I will soon post an interview with Mathew Crawford to confirm this. He is at roundingtheworld.substack.com if you want a preview. It’s a painful insight, an unfortunate black pill. Being Pollyanna about it helps no-one.
Best and thanks for your contribution, even if it turns out to be the last one. If you return, please always post in the comments so everyone can see your ideas.
Robert Yoho, MD
It is refreshing to have a scientific discussion presented. Too many substacks propose theories without addressing a counter-explanation. That is not science, nor is it legal analysis. For the past four years - and much longer - we have been living under a system where both essential components have been stripped from analysis, meaning there is no analysis. The LCQ theory reminds me of braces or fillings amplifying AM radio waves. Surely, dentists and orthodontists did not intend for this outcome, but it occurred. So I side with George until further evidence. Even well-intentioned theories, if unfounded, add to the fog of war.
Top of the article is excellent. The last time I watched Mercola interviewed (CHD) my jaw dropped to the floor. It served as the fuel to move past both Mercola and CHD. I have noticed-- when one is focused on graphene, there is no critical thinking of known neurotoxins. An early chemical analysis of different brands and batches found various KNOWN toxins. In our current, absurd new electrical environment, the good ole' poisons is all you need to become ill. Microwave radiation and mercury interact in known ways. Any theory that is not founded on this reality raises my suspicion. If any real epidemiology was happening, there would be studies looking at the 'died suddenly' (compared to living siblings) to document ongoing poisoning, like amalgams, root canals, metal implants, piercing, tattoos, wi-fi levels, RF levels, dirty electricity level running behind the wall where they sleep, etc. in addition to vaccine schedule. I am beginning to think all the poisons (while true and definitely neurotoxic) are not only used to control the population's level of illness, but also used to engineer division among the population of the partial-awake. Where does it end? At this point, most of us who desire freedoms are arguing over details founded on wrong assumptions. To me, it is all beginning to look like layers of wrong. Thank you for the thought-provoking article.
We seem to be opposed by a scrum or mob or swarm without central control.
I agree that deciding what's true is our top priority. It's important too, to separate information from the people providing it. Otherwise we risk blindly following everything someone says just because we trust them, as opposed to trusting ourselves to discern the truth.
No one is right 100% of the time. This is especially true in the health field where we're inevitably sorting through research, reports, and expertise contaminated by special interests of various kinds. Being wrong doesn't make someone a liar, though they certainly work among us. My research and experience often lead me to different conclusions than you express. Is one of us a liar? Not necessarily. But one of us definitely has better discernment or more direct relevant experience and both of us think we're that one!
I follow all kinds of people. Some because I like to identify the controlled opposition and see what they're putting out there. A distinct few because they have proven themselves adept researchers and truth tellers. They are always reader funded and have no connection to companies pushing health-care products of any kind, which makes for inevitable bias. But none of them are going to be right all the time because they're human.
Contrary to what your pen name suggests, you have more bandwidth than me
What's in a name? That which we call a bird's brain would be a bird brain without the ... 's
A sense of humor!
Or is it antipathy for apostrophe apostasy? 🤔
Show me. These posts go through paid Grammarly.
I was noting the difference between being bird brain and bird's brain, with people ignoring the apostrophe.
I'm greatful for my grandparents understanding of the advent of television. They always called it propaganda.
my grandparents called it the idiot box, said watching it would make me an idiot and don't ever allow other people to do my thinking for me.
Yes, back in the day people were more aware and intelligent.
Important stuff!
But too strident. Stridency sets off my spidey sense also.
Remember the rule of three. If someone lies to you once, it could be a mistake. Lies to you twice, it could still be a misunderstanding. Three times, you are dealing with a chronic liar. Proceed accordingly.
You are too generous.
And you are too stwict. ;-) Humans deserve a bit of slack. We all have feet of clay.
Here is another principle I have found useful:
Lust for certainty leads to self-deception.
The thing about the people I'm judging is they are sophisticated
I am thinking... you are among the highest performing humans out there. Sometimes you forget to cut some slack to the rest of us. Eh? :-)
Too generous. Do not be overly impressed. I'm 70 and spent the past few years learning to write. My analyses are derivative.
Thanks for your opinions, most interesting and believable. You say that you have researched HRT and that it is a positive thing but you didn’t define what type of HRT. I could more readily agree with you if you were only talking about bio-identical hormones but not if you were referring to synthetic analogue hormones. I’ve had some negative experience with those both personally and professionally. I have trusted Mercola for 25 years and, like you, have been surprised at his pivots. From time to time over the years I have seen Mercola change his advice in light of new evidence and have viewed that as an indication of his honesty. However, I have never really believed in some of his more extreme recommendations and although he is only in his late 60s, a few years older than me, his appearance does not look healthy to me and I’ve often wondered about that. From my point of view, the jury is out on Mercola and I will continue to read his stuff. I find it very hard to believe that, after all these years, the powers that be have finally managed to tame him. Time will tell I suppose.
I have also been a long-time Mercola follower. I too became concerned after seeing a recent interview he did. But, my first thought was not of him being tamed, or "switching sides", but of him maybe buckling a little beneath what must be a mountain of stress from the intense and constant scrutiny. I'm just 'standing by' for now...
excellent comments . I thought I referenced my book Hormone Secrets. For a free download see: https://dl.bookfunnel.com/p7dvqow83g
Chaos agents abound, as you say. Discernment is a challenge but of immense importance. Too many people are happy to accept what is asserted by what they consider "their side" without using discernment. A better approach, if you are unable to discern for yourself, is to say "I'm not sure what to believe."
For the graphene the most likely thing, besides the manufacturing defects, is simple fertility reduction. It's been Bill Gate's open agenda for his whole life, so why change now? Some additive that, in their studies, minimizes detection and lifestyle while making them more infertile.
Agree one hundred percent on sources and how we should evaluate them. One of your better columns.
Another good one, the mere affirmation of my thought/opinions of the mass amount questionable info helps me so much and brightens my week - your fingers on so many diverse “experts” makes you my go to substacker to slosh through this shit show clown world, a tad happier and secure in my discernment. It again, is truly comforting to find a much needed big brother from another mother. You are very much appreciated for all that you do and Thanks. Safe travels but more importantly have tons of fun!
touching comment
always cry bullshit rather than adopting the latest thing
Today Substacker Unbecoming had an interview with Timothy winey-absolutely fascinating. Hoping an interview with you to bring it down to levels of understanding of his theories/experiments of hydrophobicity, etc.
The mighty don’t want the meek to inherit earth. They are farming us like livestock, making us weak and susceptible to death. What I find interesting is the high similarity between the actions of the elites and what the Sumerian tablets tell us about the actions of the gods who they claim walked amongst them. The similarity is astounding. They are copying the Sumerian gods in an awful lot of what they do
Sitting on the internet all day every day writing and reading about what’s going on has got to stop. People seem to be trying to make a buck out of the situation rather than plan revolution. They are all hat and no cowboy.
I’m glad you have seen mercola in a different light
Revolution is the only solution and if organised well can be quick and relatively painless for everyone. It would sure beat just talking about it anyway
We Are Being Farmed!
Growing up with fascism
A slave to the corporate state
those who don’t buy the illusion
For them they’ve planned a special fate
From birth to euthanasia
We have a value to the state
Keep up your contribution
And you may get through unscathed
(Chorus)
We are being pharmed
We are being harmed
State medias false reality
paid to keep us calm
We are being farmed
We are being harmed
The useless eaters must be euthanised
For the well-being of us all
With smiles and hugs from academics
Your numbers written on the wall.
We must ignore the vaccine genocide
Autism, allergy and Sid’s
Pretend we don’t know what is causing them
Or theyll send around the pigs
Chorus)
We are being pharmed
We are being harmed
State media’s false reality
paid to keep us calm
We are being farmed
We are being harmed
Some genetics they will target
A threat to the corporate purse
Those with inefficient detox genes
Evidence of events adverse
Theyre still practising eugenics
It’s Designed into the state
If your genes are problematic
Predetermined is your fate
(Chorus)
We are being pharmed
We are being harmed
State medias false reality
paid to keep us calm
We are being pharmed
We are being harmed
We are being farmed
We must raise our arms
Thanks M
Thank you ever so much Dr Yoho! I am so glad you have written about Mercola! A few days ago I left a comment on one of his articles essentially giving thanks to God for his awesome creation as opposed to evolution (the article asserted that trees had changed what they were doing in order to fatten up squirrels). I was banned for doing this without any right of reply or appeal. I had apparently breached 'community guidelines', and yet I was not provided any 'community guidelines', and I was not advised of exactly how I had breached! To say I was shocked is an understatement as I have been following Mercola for 10yrs+.
FYI - This was the email I was sent...
" For over a quarter of a century, this site has aimed to equip you with information to take charge of your health. We recognize, however, that not everyone has been able to apply this knowledge personally, often due to circumstances beyond their control or responsibility. Moving forward, our focus will shift towards providing content that empowers you to make informed decisions for fostering health and joy in your life. Our goal is to foster a supportive community where everyone can safely explore and learn these principles.
Regarding your recent contribution, it does not align with our site's renewed focus, and as a result, you will be temporarily banned for one day. Should there be future posts from you that do not adhere to our guidelines, the duration of bans will increase progressively: a week for the next instance, followed by a month, three months, six months, and then a year. A violation after a one-year ban will lead to a permanent ban from the site. "
I was aghast at the condescension of the first paragraph...apparently I have not spiritually arrived - perhaps through no fault of my own. Am I misinterpreting that?
Trawling through his previous posts I found the strange one in February 24 he had written about 'refocusing' and that he has decided that he wants to provide joy to people as a priority. This was the same article that advised his followers that articles would be no longer hidden behind a paywall.
I personally happen to think the elite filth out of the UN will eventually declare Sunday as earth day and decree that everyone must 'worship' nature on this day - get involved in the paganism, worship the beast type scenario like the Bible says. I had always been worried that the natural health crowd, the Mercolas of the world, who have onboarded so many spiritualistic practices, such as Flower essences for one example, would fall for this new-age lie.
After searching a bit I too found he has been consulting with spiritualists. In Christianity we call this witchcraft. The joy Mercola feels is the pride of life, not the reverence the living God, and nothing good can come of ghosting God, and setting yourself or Demons up as the ultimate authority. One of my first thoughts in all this was...but Dr Yoho loves Dr Mercola, as do many people. I am so glad you have called out his bad behaviour, and what a hero for the ghosting stance!
We can’t worry about those, like mercola, who fell in battle. All we have time for are these brief epitaphs.
Thank you! I am sorry for him, but he has allowed himself take the counsel of demons. Yes, we are all but a breath of wind. And we have a battle to fight.
❤️❤️
1) Birds’ brains are vastly underrated. While small, they have concentrated, high amounts of neurons. I learned a lot by watching crows, chickens, peafowl, and parrots.
2) Are you familiar with Geoff Pain, PhD, who writes from Australia on Substack? He is a biochemist and has done extensive work on fluoride harms in the past, and he now writes prolifically about the Covid shot harms. He says all of the phenomena being attributed to graphene can be explained by the endotoxin contaminants of the shots.
Sounds rational and George agrees. I just asked him and we are on a road trip together.
One link, but not the exact one I searched for.
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/edta-deaths-in-america
Yes and thanks for the link. EDTA sometimes causes fatalities for metal exposures. Great link
Pain has a couple of articles that I want to bring to your and George’s attention on related topics, but I have to go find links. Safe travels.
Rather than completely ghosting people completely, I think it's better to take "what you need and leave the rest" using your discernment skills as your guide. No ONE person is a complete expert in all facets (medical, financial, governmental, legal, big pharma, environmental, etc, etc) of what's been attacked or manipulated in the last few years/decades/centuries. I do question people who seemingly turn tide to the "dark side" in mid-stream, as exhibited by our dear "Republican" Speaker of the House. He was taken into a SCIF and given, at least, a talking to before selling us out for another $100B for foreign proxy wars (with more "giving" planned for August, I hear) and NOTHING for the American people. Did MJ just change his mind after promising border funding was a hill to die on before any more funding went out of the US? Was he bribed, was his family threatened, was he threatened with "finding" child-porn on his computer? Reports are that he received a $4M campaign donation from AIPAC right before/after the vote. Then, there are others who can and have changed their thinking about vaccines and govt control (etc) just due to the happenings of the last 4 yrs because they realized that THEY had been lied to themselves for years. I also highly question people who claim to be "experts" or are put up as "experts" on several different, starkly contrasting subjects that have nothing to do with their true educational or career background. If you, a medical doctor, suddenly wrote an article advising me on legal property matters, I'm not sure I'd pay much heed without further investigation. I had a comment-exchange earlier today about this who-to-trust subject. They accused Sasha Latypova of being a liar and a level2 gatekeeper because she doesn't believe in the "Internet of Bodies", so on that point alone, he's thrown out every other thing she's said and done, along with Katherine Watt. I believe that's completely short-sighted, even to the point of being willfully blind. Sasha doesn't claim to be a networking expert (I'm not even sure I've heard her talk about that but she possibly has). I also question your heavy reliance on your ONE - "top engineer, George" although he's probably more qualified to speak on these tech topics being a "software engineer" than the "assinine chemtrails", where he was also put forth as an "expert" solely because he's been a "airplane fanatic since childhood". I still wonder what makes anonymous George considered to be a "top" engineer? Top in his company? Top in his city? Top in the country...the world? Top because you admire him? We don’t know and have no way to check besides your endorsement. This BT topic was lightly touched on back then, and I agreed with George about the BT signals - they simply don't work like they've been presented by some. But I agree because I also have a background in IT hardware and software and corporate networking so I knew how these technologies worked prior to these claims being thrown out.
I think I remember correctly, the commenters on your article about "chemtrials are assinine" were not completely impressed nor convinced by George.😕 If we used your parameters of discernment as our guide, there's many of us who would no longer be subscribed to your substack. 🤷♀️
I appreciate your seriousness and lengthy response. George is completely credible to me both for “chemtrail” and for these issues. I'll leave you to him
Trust me, bro.
:-) you funny, honey.
👍 to all points in your post. You're hired.
Good points. I can see both sides. I also understand that ghosting is a survival strategy right now, particularly for "digital soldiers" on the front lines of the information war.
9 And this I pray, that your charity may more and more abound in knowledge, and in all understanding: 10 That you may approve the better things, that you may be sincere and without offence unto the day of Christ,
Phillipians 1: 9-10
https://www.drbo.org/chapter/57001.htm