Thanks- so needed a dose of Yoho uncensored today - just about the only thing I did right was not getting my twin boy circumcised (also shut down vax for my 4 youngest kids around ages 12 because of Hep B and gardisal pushes - total instinct not science research and threatened everyone of my grown ass adult spawn mass MOM punishments if any one of them gets the C bioweapon. It worked. Hope I made up for early pharma mistakes. You, sir, make my week livable.
This will seem like it is off topic but it is not. It is directly over the target, which is why I get so banned everywhere.
Funny that you just published this as I just started reading 2 books by a guy named Ronnie Po-chia Hsia: (1) Trent 1475: Stories of a Ritual Murder Trial and (2) The Myth of Ritual Murder: Jews and Magic in Reformation.
After the story of Diddy lawsuits scandal broke, a name emerged. Lucian Grainge was named in one of the lawsuits. One of the most powerful men in the music biz. Candace Owens reported during Holy Week that Grainge's father (mysteriously not listed on Wikipedia) was a tailor who dressed the Beatles on Savile Row.
Of course I then immediately thought of notorious pervert and pedophile, Jimmy Savile. Related?
James Alefantis' parents are also not listed on his Wikipedia. Red flag! They say he is a Rothschild.
All of this broke during Holy Week. And Simon of Trent was murdered during Holy Week. Coincidence? Don't get me started on eucharistic miracles. This is all connected.
PS: I did not allow my son to be circumcised. His Jewish grandmother complained, just as she complained about him not being vaccinated. Turns out I was right on both counts. The shiksa!
My gentile newborn son was not circumcised. I did not permit his "perfunctory" mutilation.
Doctors are financially incentivised, or at least they used to be, for recommending this barbaric procedure.
I also screamed, from the operating room table "NO SILVER NITRATE! NO VITAMIN K!"
The pediatrician attending my baby yelled back: "IT'S THE LAW!!"
I screamed: "PRINT OUT THAT LAW AND SHOW ME THEN!!"
That was the end of THAT argument. Or so I believed.
They administered morphine to me without my knowledge or consent, post-op. (I had a terrible reaction.)
7 hours later, my son was finally brought to my room. It was my first look at him. I unswaddled him and examined every centimeter of his body. Discovered a bandaid on the heel of a foot...
When I asked a nurse what did they inject my son with? She replied: "Vitamin K." And proceeded to "inform" me about Vitamin K.
AFTER the fact.
I was sleep deprived. Upset. Said I KNOW all that. You jabbed my baby AGAINST MY WISHES. WITHOUT CONSENT!
A few hours later I received a visit from a "counselor"...
I knew I needed to get myself and my baby out of that hospital STAT.
I'd just endured a "one in a million" operation with no anesthesia. I'd survived a (botched) c-section, as confessed (confirmed) to me by the troubled surgeon who'd performed it, went home, could not sleep and returned to my ("upgraded to private") hospital room in order to apologise and attempt to explain what exactly "went wrong"...
And although I had not slept in 60 hours, could barely walk, had no support system in place and staples were still in my belly: I called a friend who helped me escape.
If you don't already know this folks:
Once you are "admitted" to hospital? You had better know your RIGHTS and even if you DO know your RIGHTS? Your RIGHTS can and will be IGNORED.
Make certain you have an advocate in case anything "goes wrong".
An advocate who can read charts and investigate medications.
Do NOT "trust".
Do not permit your newborns to be perfunctorily administered drugs they DO NOT NEED.
And finally: STOP mutilating your baby boys!! (And GIRLS. They're still practising this barbaric procedure in African countries.)
It’s hard not to gag when looking at pictures of those two psychos. Not breakfast material. I don’t understand the circumcision thing either - it’s Old Testament but not sure about the thinking behind it. It used to be thought of as a “cleanliness” thing but I don’t think that has real cred. I have heard about the diminished nerve endings in men. The mutilation of women is wicked as well. It seems these cultures are doing it to their own children, as per the example you mentioned. What a mess. The worst is that these excrement-lookalikes, such as B&H, are still roaming around the planet, still bereft of their orange jumpsuits and folding cots. Money trumps law it seems, but hopefully not forever.
I have never heard about the harmful effects of circumcision until this article! I have a 35 year old son and am troubled that I consented to this procedure. Our medical system is messed up! Is anything true or good for you anymore as it relates to our healthcare? So many lies.
"It was my idea to use fMRI and/or PET scanning to directly observe the effects of circumcision on the infant brain.
Analysis of the MRI data indicated that the surgery subjected the infant to significant trauma. The greatest changes occurred in the limbic system concentrating in the amygdala and in the frontal and temporal lobes.
A neurologist who saw the results postulated that the data indicated that #circumcision affected most intensely the portions of the victim’s brain associated with reasoning, perception and emotions.
Follow up tests on the infant one day, one week and one month after the surgery indicated that the child’s brain never returned to its baseline configuration. In other words, the evidence generated by this research indicated that the brain of the circumcised infant was permanently changed by the surgery." — Paul D. Tinari, PhD
"One area of the CIA’s research that is rarely talked about, or even known, is male circumcision or genital mutilation.
Cansever describes a study of the psychology of boys circumcised between the ages of 4 and 7 both before and after the surgery, based on various methods of psychological examination, and reports the following trends among the subjects:
• lower IQ as measured 7 days after the operation
• infantile regression of drawings and expressed wishes
• greater measured levels of aggression
• new fears and anxieties
• weaker control over primitive impulses to the point of maladaption
• greater aggression towards their mothers
• withdrawal from human relationships and difficulty responding to demands of external world
• perceptions of having been castrated
It turns out that in 1961, the CIA had payed “Cansever” to study the effects of circumcision, and he found that it made boys dumber, more infantile, more fearful, and more aggressive, with less control over their base instincts and a healthy dose of aggression towards the most significant female figure in their lives, their mothers.
If the findings of this study hold true for boys circumcised younger, it might suggest that the United States contains some 100+ million men who have been psychologically altered, from as early as infancy, to be stupider, to have lower impulse control, to tend towards aggression and violence, and to possess an instinctual distrust of women.
Throw in the diminishing effects of circumcision on penile sensitivity and the consequent difficulties of sex and tendency towards paraphilias, and a picture begins to emerge of an organic golem that can be manipulated more easily by carrots and is less able to establish a normal, healthy relationship with a woman—splitting the family apart or preventing its formation has always been a goal of oppressive regimes, including the one that currently rules over the US.
Unfortunately for many of us, there exists, at this point, ample evidence that events in infancy can and do have measurable effects on the hindbrain, the part of our brain that drives instinctual, “gut” reactions and behavior. This is especially true when it comes to traumatic events that trigger stress hormones such as partial amputation of the penis, routinely performed at birth in this country.
Although humans are cognizant of their lives, making behaviorism a dead area of psychology, it is still understood that instinctual behavior plays a role in decision-making, which is why propaganda and advertising are so widespread. How attached will men be to their women if they are surgically predisposed more to masturbate to pornography than to enjoy normal, PIV sex? Is it really a stretch to claim that enjoyment of sex is determined, in part, by the existing or removed enervation of the sex organ involved, and that this might have an effect on the interpersonal relationships of men and women across the country?
It is also worth noting that, according to Leonard Glick in Marked in Your Flesh, circumcision of gentiles is twice used in the Old Testament as a means of disfiguring humiliation and domination by Israelites, and it may still be interpreted as such by a certain religiously-minded tribe. I am not a mind-reader, and intelligent minds can differ on the motivations of various groups that encourage circumcision in the United States, but the historical context of mass, non-consensual circumcision of gentiles may be a clue as to what is going on here."
Regarding "Parting Shot #3:" Haha! I was wondering where that letter "Q" is and I think you meant a "magnifying glass" icon. 😄😉 Thanks for the tip though. 😊
I had my, now 25, son in Northern Commifornia, but thankfully did not consent to circumcision. I was poor, single and couldn’t pay for it anyway so nobody tried to change my mind. Meanwhile, my cousin, a converted jew and her Israeli hubby had their boy go through with the ritual and I witnessed it. How utterly gruesome and perverse it was and not a soul questioned it. My son is thankful I kept him intact. Unfortunately, I allowed those filthy doctors and nurses do their other bidding of vaccinations and vit K. Very regretful of my ignorance.
Assessing the Latest Claims, from Marked In Your Flesh by Dr. GLICK, R. I. P.
Consider the most popular recent justification for circumcision: that it prevents HIV infection—presumably because the toughened glans might be more resistant to viral invasion. I noted in chapter 7 that this was first proposed as a possibility—without any research evidence—in 1986 by Aaron J. Fink. Despite obvious contradictory evidence from the American experience, the claim has gained support among some epidemiologists focusing on the HIV-AIDS epidemic in Africa. On the American side, the proposal was clearly misplaced, since the evidence points in precisely the opposite direction: the United States has the largest number of circumcised adult males and one of the highest HIV infection rates in the developed world.
The literature on HIV infection and AIDS in Africa is much too extensive for more than a brief overview here, but I can outline the dimensions of this complex problem. First, while HIV infection and AIDS in the United States have been especially prevalent among homosexual men and drug users, the great majority of infected Africans are heterosexual men and women. Second, major confounding elements connected with sexual practices have been either overlooked or accorded insufficient consideration, particularly in Africa. For example, circumcised African men are disproportionately Muslim; and since Muslims are supposed to avoid alcohol, these men are less likely to frequent bars where they might come in contact with infected prostitutes. Sexual promiscuity of any kind obviously exposes men and women to danger from infection of all sorts. A widely publicized study of long-distance truck drivers in Kenya argued that their high rate of HIV infection was attributable to their having foreskins. But these men, living on the road and traveling from one truck-stop to another, frequently encounter HIV-infected prostitutes. In contrast, a study in Uganda of HIV transmission in monogamous, heterosexual couples in which only one partner was already infected, found that the circumcision status of the male partner was not a significant factor.
Still another consideration is a misguided practice called “dry sex”: use of powders, sand, or other agents, ostensibly to heighten sexual sensation by removing normal vaginal lubrication. This is an obvious potential cause of genital abrasions and lacerations that may promote infection with sexually transmitted pathogens in both men and women. Finally, evidence is accumulating that use of nonsterile injection needles by medical personnel and use of contaminated instruments by ritual circumcisers are major causes of HIV infection in Africa—possibly the most important of all.
A 1999 article by two of the most dedicated advocates for mass circumcision in Africa concluded with a sensible “caution”:
Offering male-circumcision services as a way to prevent HIV transmission will be counterproductive if men opt for the procedure believing it will fully protect them from AIDS.... Male circumcision interventions must not be perceived by individuals or communities as a substitute for other HIV and STD prevention strategies.
Now that the value of circumcision as a possible preventive strategy has come to be seen as highly questionable, this warning takes on added cogency.
Returning to the American scene, I’ve already mentioned the latest medical justification here: that circumcision prevents urinary tract infection (UTI) in infants and young children. As has been the case with each new medical claim, a large literature emerged, and in a familiar pattern: one or two dedicated advocates publish widely and steadily, a few physicians support them, others question or reject their arguments. In this case, as I’ve shown, the leading claimant has been Thomas E. Wiswell, seconded by that most tireless contemporary advocate for circumcision, Edgar J. Schoen.
The first point to note is that although girls are far more likely than boys to develop a UTI, no one proposes “corrective” surgery to protect them. But that matter aside, advocates themselves acknowledge that only about 2.2 percent of intact boys will develop a UTI in the crucial first year of life, while a smaller number of circumcised boys will also have the problem. In other words, of every 1,000 circumcised infants, about 980 receive no preventive benefit. Moreover, very few of the other twenty are in serious trouble; most UTIs are readily treatable with antibiotics and, in boys as well as girls, usually resolve within a few days without complications. Most of the few boys who go on to develop more serious urinary tract disease have prior deformities or were inadequately treated in the initial phase of the illness.
Some physicians have also proposed that a number of confounding elements—for example, previous maternal infection, premature birth, parental education and hygiene—may influence UTI rates more than circumcision advocates have recognized.
Balanced assessment of the substantial evidence on sexually transmitted diseases has shown no significant differences between circumcised and intact men; if anything, circumcised men may be slightly more susceptible to some infections.
In short, by any reasonable standard for cost-benefit analysis, arguments for circumcision as a medical preventive fail; there is no justification for circumcising millions of infants in hopes of preventing a few cases of illness. Finally, we should always keep in mind that, with the single exception of Israel, the United States is the only country in the world where nearly 60 percent of male infants are still being circumcised. Comparative studies consistently demonstrate that boys and men in other countries have no medical problems primarily attributable to possession of intact genitals.
Claims that a circumcised penis is “neater,” more attractive, and so forth—trivial when measured against evidence for harm—being purely subjective, are impossible to counter with factual arguments. But there is certainly no evidence that European, Latin American, or Asian men—nearly all intact—experience rejection on that account. In fact, women from these continents sometimes express surprise and dismay when they encounter circumcised American men. In the West, acceptance of circumcision as the norm is a cultural phenomenon limited to the United States and Israel.
~*~*~
“MARKED IN YOUR FLESH: Circumcision from Ancient Judea to Modern America”
I appreciate your objective and truthful commenting on circumcision and FGM. Only you would and could do this valiant service to truth.
I trace the dark side of human nature to the fall of man in the garden of Eden.
The history of “population control” goes back further than recorded history. Dr. Stan Monteith on his Radio Liberty broadcasts and writings did many shows on population control. Dr. Stan’s 1997 “ The Population Control Agenda “ monograph is short and readable and widely available on the web.
Heres a copy and paste of one of my personal files on population control.
In "The First Global Revolution,"[1991] published by The Council of the Club of Rome, an international elitist organization, the authors note that: "In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine, and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention ...The real enemy, then, is humanity itself."
The Club of Rome is a conspiratorial umbrella organization, a marriage between Anglo-American financiers and the old Black Nobility families of Europe, particularly the so-called "nobility" of London, Venice and Genoa. The key to the successful control of the world is their ability to create and manage savage economic recessions and eventual depressions. The Committee of 300 looks to social convulsions on a global scale, followed by depressions, as a softening-up technique for bigger things to come, as its principal method of creating masses of people all over the world who will become its "welfare" recipients of the future.
Illuminism and the master plan for world domination
-- by: David Allen Rivera, 1994, source: Coming Judgement
:: MHP hypertext version for non-profit educational use only. Follow links for related info ::
The Club of Rome and Population Reduction
The Club of Rome, the Limits to Growth, and the AIDS epidemic
• The Origin of the Club of Rome
•
• "The Limits to Growth"
•
• Origins of the HIV/AIDS Virus
•
• The Beginning of the AIDS Epidemic
•
• Progress of the AIDS Epidemic
•
Three years later, in April, 1968 a think-tank of financiers, scientists, economists, politicians, heads of state, and industrialists from ten different countries, again met at Rockefeller's private estate in Bellagio, Italy, at the request of Aurelio Peccei, the Italian industrialist who had close ties to Fiat and the Olivetti Corporation. He claimed to have solutions for world peace and prosperity, which could be accomplished through world government.
The Club of Rome (COR) was established with a membership of 75 prominent scientists, industrialists, and economists from 25 countries, which along with the Bilderberg, have become one of the most important foreign policy arms of the Round Table group.
Many of the COR executives were drawn from NATO and they have been able to formulate a lot of what NATO claims are its policies. Through Lord Carrington, they were able to split NATO into two factions: a left-wing political group whose doctrine was formed on the basis of Peccei's book Human Quality, and its former military alliance.
The first Club of Rome conference in the U.S. was in 1969, where the American branch was organized as the "American Association of the Club of Rome." Among its members were:
• Norman Cousins (honorary Chairman of Planetary Citizens)
•
• John Naisbitt (author of Megatrends)
• Amory Lovins (a speaker at Windstar, John Denver's New Age center in Snowmass, Colorado)
•
• Betty Friedan (founding President of NOW, the National Organization of Women)
•
• Jean Houston and Hazel Henderson (New Age authors and speakers)
•
• Robert O. Anderson and Harlan B. Cleveland (CFR members and part of the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies)
•
• Sen. Claiborne Pell (D-RI)
•
• Rep. Frank M. Potter (staff director of the House Subcommittee on Energy).
Throughout the world, the Club of Rome has indicated that genocide should be used to eliminate people who they refer to as "useless eaters." This would be accomplished by using limited wars in advanced countries, and even a limited nuclear strike at a strategic location; as well as starvation through created famines and diseases in Third World countries.
In the 1976 novel Ceremony of the Innocent by Taylor Caldwell, she effectively explains the rationale behind their actions:
"...there will be no peace in the tormented world, only a programmed and systematic series of wars and calamities- until the plotters have gained their objective: an exhausted world willing to submit to a planned Marxist economy and total and meek enslavement- in the name of peace."
We need a significant external menace
"When the tyrant has disposed of foreign enemies by conquest or treaty, and there is nothing to fear from them, then he is always stirring up some war or other, in order that the people may require a leader." Plato: The Republic [1]
"Is there any means known to man more effective than war, assuming you wish to alter the life of an entire people?" The Carnegie Endowment: 1908 [2]
1. John Bartlett, Familiar Quotations, Little, Brown and Company, Boston, 1960, p. 85. Quoting Plato's Republic.
2.
Plato lived in Athens around 300 BC
2. Norman Dodd Interview, Radio Liberty. Also quoted by John McManus, Changing Commands, The John Birch Society, Appleton, WI, 1995, p. 87.
The psychological implications of circumcision may be profound. Erik Erikson has established that the first and most critical task of psychological development is trust (Erikson, 1950). He states that trust is the ground of all later development and it is focused entirely on the mother. Dr. Rima Laibow, a psychiatrist in New York, who has invented a mode of regressive therapy, points out that because the mother has been the entire universe to the infant since its life began in utero, it is imprinted to experience all pleasure and all pain as flowing from the mother. Mother controls all.
American medical schools have taught Forced Retraction for 100 years. It injures the baby's penis, then the doctor recommends circumcision to fix the injury. Infant circumcision is rare to non-existent around the world EXCEPT for the United States. Forced retraction is the biggest culprit in the so-called "medical reasons" for American circumcision, which are caused by following a doctor's harmful instructions to retract the boy "for cleaning". Doctors Opposing Circumcision has apologized to the nation. "As an international physicians’ organization, we deeply apologize for the conduct of our fellow professional, and for the unnecessary injury done to your son. American health care professionals are often not well trained or familiar with the normal, intact penis, which can lead to inappropriate and even harmful care or advice. Though the possible consequences of premature, forcible foreskin retraction (PFFR) can be serious, most boys recover without a problem, although they have lost a protective membrane and may be at risk for some complications."
Enzymes and immune components are secreted by the foreskin’s mucous membranes, fighting off pathogens and disease. According to a report on the Immunological functions of the human prepuce, these immune components include:
cathepsin B
lysozyme
chymotrypsin
neutrophil elastase
cytokine
These components, like the secretions from vaginal mucosa in a female, are important for protecting the penis from infection.
Thanks- so needed a dose of Yoho uncensored today - just about the only thing I did right was not getting my twin boy circumcised (also shut down vax for my 4 youngest kids around ages 12 because of Hep B and gardisal pushes - total instinct not science research and threatened everyone of my grown ass adult spawn mass MOM punishments if any one of them gets the C bioweapon. It worked. Hope I made up for early pharma mistakes. You, sir, make my week livable.
This will seem like it is off topic but it is not. It is directly over the target, which is why I get so banned everywhere.
Funny that you just published this as I just started reading 2 books by a guy named Ronnie Po-chia Hsia: (1) Trent 1475: Stories of a Ritual Murder Trial and (2) The Myth of Ritual Murder: Jews and Magic in Reformation.
I never heard the story of Simon of Trent until a friend sent it to me yesterday: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_of_Trent
Tunnels, ritual sacrifice of children, blood libel, Epstein Island... hmm...
"March 25, 2024: Homeland Security agents searched Combs’ L.A. and Miami mansions as part of a federal inquiry into sex trafficking allegations against him conducted by the prosecutors in the Southern District of New York. The investigation is ongoing." (https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/story/2024-03-26/diddy-allegations-controversies-timeline-sean-combs)
After the story of Diddy lawsuits scandal broke, a name emerged. Lucian Grainge was named in one of the lawsuits. One of the most powerful men in the music biz. Candace Owens reported during Holy Week that Grainge's father (mysteriously not listed on Wikipedia) was a tailor who dressed the Beatles on Savile Row.
Of course I then immediately thought of notorious pervert and pedophile, Jimmy Savile. Related?
James Alefantis' parents are also not listed on his Wikipedia. Red flag! They say he is a Rothschild.
All of this broke during Holy Week. And Simon of Trent was murdered during Holy Week. Coincidence? Don't get me started on eucharistic miracles. This is all connected.
PS: I did not allow my son to be circumcised. His Jewish grandmother complained, just as she complained about him not being vaccinated. Turns out I was right on both counts. The shiksa!
My gentile newborn son was not circumcised. I did not permit his "perfunctory" mutilation.
Doctors are financially incentivised, or at least they used to be, for recommending this barbaric procedure.
I also screamed, from the operating room table "NO SILVER NITRATE! NO VITAMIN K!"
The pediatrician attending my baby yelled back: "IT'S THE LAW!!"
I screamed: "PRINT OUT THAT LAW AND SHOW ME THEN!!"
That was the end of THAT argument. Or so I believed.
They administered morphine to me without my knowledge or consent, post-op. (I had a terrible reaction.)
7 hours later, my son was finally brought to my room. It was my first look at him. I unswaddled him and examined every centimeter of his body. Discovered a bandaid on the heel of a foot...
When I asked a nurse what did they inject my son with? She replied: "Vitamin K." And proceeded to "inform" me about Vitamin K.
AFTER the fact.
I was sleep deprived. Upset. Said I KNOW all that. You jabbed my baby AGAINST MY WISHES. WITHOUT CONSENT!
A few hours later I received a visit from a "counselor"...
I knew I needed to get myself and my baby out of that hospital STAT.
I'd just endured a "one in a million" operation with no anesthesia. I'd survived a (botched) c-section, as confessed (confirmed) to me by the troubled surgeon who'd performed it, went home, could not sleep and returned to my ("upgraded to private") hospital room in order to apologise and attempt to explain what exactly "went wrong"...
And although I had not slept in 60 hours, could barely walk, had no support system in place and staples were still in my belly: I called a friend who helped me escape.
If you don't already know this folks:
Once you are "admitted" to hospital? You had better know your RIGHTS and even if you DO know your RIGHTS? Your RIGHTS can and will be IGNORED.
Make certain you have an advocate in case anything "goes wrong".
An advocate who can read charts and investigate medications.
Do NOT "trust".
Do not permit your newborns to be perfunctorily administered drugs they DO NOT NEED.
And finally: STOP mutilating your baby boys!! (And GIRLS. They're still practising this barbaric procedure in African countries.)
It’s hard not to gag when looking at pictures of those two psychos. Not breakfast material. I don’t understand the circumcision thing either - it’s Old Testament but not sure about the thinking behind it. It used to be thought of as a “cleanliness” thing but I don’t think that has real cred. I have heard about the diminished nerve endings in men. The mutilation of women is wicked as well. It seems these cultures are doing it to their own children, as per the example you mentioned. What a mess. The worst is that these excrement-lookalikes, such as B&H, are still roaming around the planet, still bereft of their orange jumpsuits and folding cots. Money trumps law it seems, but hopefully not forever.
I have never heard about the harmful effects of circumcision until this article! I have a 35 year old son and am troubled that I consented to this procedure. Our medical system is messed up! Is anything true or good for you anymore as it relates to our healthcare? So many lies.
.
Medicine Is Not A Science.
It’s A Business.
Your Only Job
Is To Make It Too Costly
For Them. To Kill You.
Either Get That.
Or They Get You.
.
"It was my idea to use fMRI and/or PET scanning to directly observe the effects of circumcision on the infant brain.
Analysis of the MRI data indicated that the surgery subjected the infant to significant trauma. The greatest changes occurred in the limbic system concentrating in the amygdala and in the frontal and temporal lobes.
A neurologist who saw the results postulated that the data indicated that #circumcision affected most intensely the portions of the victim’s brain associated with reasoning, perception and emotions.
Follow up tests on the infant one day, one week and one month after the surgery indicated that the child’s brain never returned to its baseline configuration. In other words, the evidence generated by this research indicated that the brain of the circumcised infant was permanently changed by the surgery." — Paul D. Tinari, PhD
http://circumcision.org/circumcision-permanently-alters-the-brain/
Your Whole Baby: A Community for Learning
Eric Clopper and Dr Denniston ... #circumcision
https://youtu.be/HEyTP9mafb4
*****
PRACTICED ROUTINELY by #JEWS, #MUSLIMS and #AMERICANS!!
Circumcision: the human rights violation hiding in plain sight:
https://freethinker.co.uk/2023/03/circumcision-the-human-rights-violation-hiding-in-plain-sight/
*****
"One area of the CIA’s research that is rarely talked about, or even known, is male circumcision or genital mutilation.
Cansever describes a study of the psychology of boys circumcised between the ages of 4 and 7 both before and after the surgery, based on various methods of psychological examination, and reports the following trends among the subjects:
• lower IQ as measured 7 days after the operation
• infantile regression of drawings and expressed wishes
• greater measured levels of aggression
• new fears and anxieties
• weaker control over primitive impulses to the point of maladaption
• greater aggression towards their mothers
• withdrawal from human relationships and difficulty responding to demands of external world
• perceptions of having been castrated
It turns out that in 1961, the CIA had payed “Cansever” to study the effects of circumcision, and he found that it made boys dumber, more infantile, more fearful, and more aggressive, with less control over their base instincts and a healthy dose of aggression towards the most significant female figure in their lives, their mothers.
If the findings of this study hold true for boys circumcised younger, it might suggest that the United States contains some 100+ million men who have been psychologically altered, from as early as infancy, to be stupider, to have lower impulse control, to tend towards aggression and violence, and to possess an instinctual distrust of women.
Throw in the diminishing effects of circumcision on penile sensitivity and the consequent difficulties of sex and tendency towards paraphilias, and a picture begins to emerge of an organic golem that can be manipulated more easily by carrots and is less able to establish a normal, healthy relationship with a woman—splitting the family apart or preventing its formation has always been a goal of oppressive regimes, including the one that currently rules over the US.
Unfortunately for many of us, there exists, at this point, ample evidence that events in infancy can and do have measurable effects on the hindbrain, the part of our brain that drives instinctual, “gut” reactions and behavior. This is especially true when it comes to traumatic events that trigger stress hormones such as partial amputation of the penis, routinely performed at birth in this country.
Although humans are cognizant of their lives, making behaviorism a dead area of psychology, it is still understood that instinctual behavior plays a role in decision-making, which is why propaganda and advertising are so widespread. How attached will men be to their women if they are surgically predisposed more to masturbate to pornography than to enjoy normal, PIV sex? Is it really a stretch to claim that enjoyment of sex is determined, in part, by the existing or removed enervation of the sex organ involved, and that this might have an effect on the interpersonal relationships of men and women across the country?
It is also worth noting that, according to Leonard Glick in Marked in Your Flesh, circumcision of gentiles is twice used in the Old Testament as a means of disfiguring humiliation and domination by Israelites, and it may still be interpreted as such by a certain religiously-minded tribe. I am not a mind-reader, and intelligent minds can differ on the motivations of various groups that encourage circumcision in the United States, but the historical context of mass, non-consensual circumcision of gentiles may be a clue as to what is going on here."
Link to PDF:
https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:VA6C2:5efe4c81-59b6-483d-8283-8b2181c7b251
[off-topic comment]
Regarding "Parting Shot #3:" Haha! I was wondering where that letter "Q" is and I think you meant a "magnifying glass" icon. 😄😉 Thanks for the tip though. 😊
I had my, now 25, son in Northern Commifornia, but thankfully did not consent to circumcision. I was poor, single and couldn’t pay for it anyway so nobody tried to change my mind. Meanwhile, my cousin, a converted jew and her Israeli hubby had their boy go through with the ritual and I witnessed it. How utterly gruesome and perverse it was and not a soul questioned it. My son is thankful I kept him intact. Unfortunately, I allowed those filthy doctors and nurses do their other bidding of vaccinations and vit K. Very regretful of my ignorance.
Assessing the Latest Claims, from Marked In Your Flesh by Dr. GLICK, R. I. P.
Consider the most popular recent justification for circumcision: that it prevents HIV infection—presumably because the toughened glans might be more resistant to viral invasion. I noted in chapter 7 that this was first proposed as a possibility—without any research evidence—in 1986 by Aaron J. Fink. Despite obvious contradictory evidence from the American experience, the claim has gained support among some epidemiologists focusing on the HIV-AIDS epidemic in Africa. On the American side, the proposal was clearly misplaced, since the evidence points in precisely the opposite direction: the United States has the largest number of circumcised adult males and one of the highest HIV infection rates in the developed world.
The literature on HIV infection and AIDS in Africa is much too extensive for more than a brief overview here, but I can outline the dimensions of this complex problem. First, while HIV infection and AIDS in the United States have been especially prevalent among homosexual men and drug users, the great majority of infected Africans are heterosexual men and women. Second, major confounding elements connected with sexual practices have been either overlooked or accorded insufficient consideration, particularly in Africa. For example, circumcised African men are disproportionately Muslim; and since Muslims are supposed to avoid alcohol, these men are less likely to frequent bars where they might come in contact with infected prostitutes. Sexual promiscuity of any kind obviously exposes men and women to danger from infection of all sorts. A widely publicized study of long-distance truck drivers in Kenya argued that their high rate of HIV infection was attributable to their having foreskins. But these men, living on the road and traveling from one truck-stop to another, frequently encounter HIV-infected prostitutes. In contrast, a study in Uganda of HIV transmission in monogamous, heterosexual couples in which only one partner was already infected, found that the circumcision status of the male partner was not a significant factor.
Still another consideration is a misguided practice called “dry sex”: use of powders, sand, or other agents, ostensibly to heighten sexual sensation by removing normal vaginal lubrication. This is an obvious potential cause of genital abrasions and lacerations that may promote infection with sexually transmitted pathogens in both men and women. Finally, evidence is accumulating that use of nonsterile injection needles by medical personnel and use of contaminated instruments by ritual circumcisers are major causes of HIV infection in Africa—possibly the most important of all.
A 1999 article by two of the most dedicated advocates for mass circumcision in Africa concluded with a sensible “caution”:
Offering male-circumcision services as a way to prevent HIV transmission will be counterproductive if men opt for the procedure believing it will fully protect them from AIDS.... Male circumcision interventions must not be perceived by individuals or communities as a substitute for other HIV and STD prevention strategies.
Now that the value of circumcision as a possible preventive strategy has come to be seen as highly questionable, this warning takes on added cogency.
Returning to the American scene, I’ve already mentioned the latest medical justification here: that circumcision prevents urinary tract infection (UTI) in infants and young children. As has been the case with each new medical claim, a large literature emerged, and in a familiar pattern: one or two dedicated advocates publish widely and steadily, a few physicians support them, others question or reject their arguments. In this case, as I’ve shown, the leading claimant has been Thomas E. Wiswell, seconded by that most tireless contemporary advocate for circumcision, Edgar J. Schoen.
The first point to note is that although girls are far more likely than boys to develop a UTI, no one proposes “corrective” surgery to protect them. But that matter aside, advocates themselves acknowledge that only about 2.2 percent of intact boys will develop a UTI in the crucial first year of life, while a smaller number of circumcised boys will also have the problem. In other words, of every 1,000 circumcised infants, about 980 receive no preventive benefit. Moreover, very few of the other twenty are in serious trouble; most UTIs are readily treatable with antibiotics and, in boys as well as girls, usually resolve within a few days without complications. Most of the few boys who go on to develop more serious urinary tract disease have prior deformities or were inadequately treated in the initial phase of the illness.
Some physicians have also proposed that a number of confounding elements—for example, previous maternal infection, premature birth, parental education and hygiene—may influence UTI rates more than circumcision advocates have recognized.
Balanced assessment of the substantial evidence on sexually transmitted diseases has shown no significant differences between circumcised and intact men; if anything, circumcised men may be slightly more susceptible to some infections.
In short, by any reasonable standard for cost-benefit analysis, arguments for circumcision as a medical preventive fail; there is no justification for circumcising millions of infants in hopes of preventing a few cases of illness. Finally, we should always keep in mind that, with the single exception of Israel, the United States is the only country in the world where nearly 60 percent of male infants are still being circumcised. Comparative studies consistently demonstrate that boys and men in other countries have no medical problems primarily attributable to possession of intact genitals.
Claims that a circumcised penis is “neater,” more attractive, and so forth—trivial when measured against evidence for harm—being purely subjective, are impossible to counter with factual arguments. But there is certainly no evidence that European, Latin American, or Asian men—nearly all intact—experience rejection on that account. In fact, women from these continents sometimes express surprise and dismay when they encounter circumcised American men. In the West, acceptance of circumcision as the norm is a cultural phenomenon limited to the United States and Israel.
~*~*~
“MARKED IN YOUR FLESH: Circumcision from Ancient Judea to Modern America”
~ Leonard B. Glick:
Start reading it for free:
http://a.co/51oEQVm
~*~
Greetings good doctor.
I appreciate your objective and truthful commenting on circumcision and FGM. Only you would and could do this valiant service to truth.
I trace the dark side of human nature to the fall of man in the garden of Eden.
The history of “population control” goes back further than recorded history. Dr. Stan Monteith on his Radio Liberty broadcasts and writings did many shows on population control. Dr. Stan’s 1997 “ The Population Control Agenda “ monograph is short and readable and widely available on the web.
Heres a copy and paste of one of my personal files on population control.
In "The First Global Revolution,"[1991] published by The Council of the Club of Rome, an international elitist organization, the authors note that: "In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine, and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention ...The real enemy, then, is humanity itself."
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/clubofrome.htm
Club of Rome
(Committee of 300 subversive body)
The Club of Rome is a conspiratorial umbrella organization, a marriage between Anglo-American financiers and the old Black Nobility families of Europe, particularly the so-called "nobility" of London, Venice and Genoa. The key to the successful control of the world is their ability to create and manage savage economic recessions and eventual depressions. The Committee of 300 looks to social convulsions on a global scale, followed by depressions, as a softening-up technique for bigger things to come, as its principal method of creating masses of people all over the world who will become its "welfare" recipients of the future.
http://modernhistoryproject.org/mhp?Article=FinalWarning&C=8.5
Final Warning: A History of the New World Order
Illuminism and the master plan for world domination
-- by: David Allen Rivera, 1994, source: Coming Judgement
:: MHP hypertext version for non-profit educational use only. Follow links for related info ::
The Club of Rome and Population Reduction
The Club of Rome, the Limits to Growth, and the AIDS epidemic
• The Origin of the Club of Rome
•
• "The Limits to Growth"
•
• Origins of the HIV/AIDS Virus
•
• The Beginning of the AIDS Epidemic
•
• Progress of the AIDS Epidemic
•
Three years later, in April, 1968 a think-tank of financiers, scientists, economists, politicians, heads of state, and industrialists from ten different countries, again met at Rockefeller's private estate in Bellagio, Italy, at the request of Aurelio Peccei, the Italian industrialist who had close ties to Fiat and the Olivetti Corporation. He claimed to have solutions for world peace and prosperity, which could be accomplished through world government.
The Club of Rome (COR) was established with a membership of 75 prominent scientists, industrialists, and economists from 25 countries, which along with the Bilderberg, have become one of the most important foreign policy arms of the Round Table group.
Many of the COR executives were drawn from NATO and they have been able to formulate a lot of what NATO claims are its policies. Through Lord Carrington, they were able to split NATO into two factions: a left-wing political group whose doctrine was formed on the basis of Peccei's book Human Quality, and its former military alliance.
The first Club of Rome conference in the U.S. was in 1969, where the American branch was organized as the "American Association of the Club of Rome." Among its members were:
• Norman Cousins (honorary Chairman of Planetary Citizens)
•
• John Naisbitt (author of Megatrends)
• Amory Lovins (a speaker at Windstar, John Denver's New Age center in Snowmass, Colorado)
•
• Betty Friedan (founding President of NOW, the National Organization of Women)
•
• Jean Houston and Hazel Henderson (New Age authors and speakers)
•
• Robert O. Anderson and Harlan B. Cleveland (CFR members and part of the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies)
•
• Sen. Claiborne Pell (D-RI)
•
• Rep. Frank M. Potter (staff director of the House Subcommittee on Energy).
Throughout the world, the Club of Rome has indicated that genocide should be used to eliminate people who they refer to as "useless eaters." This would be accomplished by using limited wars in advanced countries, and even a limited nuclear strike at a strategic location; as well as starvation through created famines and diseases in Third World countries.
In the 1976 novel Ceremony of the Innocent by Taylor Caldwell, she effectively explains the rationale behind their actions:
"...there will be no peace in the tormented world, only a programmed and systematic series of wars and calamities- until the plotters have gained their objective: an exhausted world willing to submit to a planned Marxist economy and total and meek enslavement- in the name of peace."
We need a significant external menace
"When the tyrant has disposed of foreign enemies by conquest or treaty, and there is nothing to fear from them, then he is always stirring up some war or other, in order that the people may require a leader." Plato: The Republic [1]
"Is there any means known to man more effective than war, assuming you wish to alter the life of an entire people?" The Carnegie Endowment: 1908 [2]
1. John Bartlett, Familiar Quotations, Little, Brown and Company, Boston, 1960, p. 85. Quoting Plato's Republic.
2.
Plato lived in Athens around 300 BC
2. Norman Dodd Interview, Radio Liberty. Also quoted by John McManus, Changing Commands, The John Birch Society, Appleton, WI, 1995, p. 87.
TRUST
On the violation of TRUST ......
http://circinfosite.info/index.php/facts-and-myths/trust/
The psychological implications of circumcision may be profound. Erik Erikson has established that the first and most critical task of psychological development is trust (Erikson, 1950). He states that trust is the ground of all later development and it is focused entirely on the mother. Dr. Rima Laibow, a psychiatrist in New York, who has invented a mode of regressive therapy, points out that because the mother has been the entire universe to the infant since its life began in utero, it is imprinted to experience all pleasure and all pain as flowing from the mother. Mother controls all.
American medical schools have taught Forced Retraction for 100 years. It injures the baby's penis, then the doctor recommends circumcision to fix the injury. Infant circumcision is rare to non-existent around the world EXCEPT for the United States. Forced retraction is the biggest culprit in the so-called "medical reasons" for American circumcision, which are caused by following a doctor's harmful instructions to retract the boy "for cleaning". Doctors Opposing Circumcision has apologized to the nation. "As an international physicians’ organization, we deeply apologize for the conduct of our fellow professional, and for the unnecessary injury done to your son. American health care professionals are often not well trained or familiar with the normal, intact penis, which can lead to inappropriate and even harmful care or advice. Though the possible consequences of premature, forcible foreskin retraction (PFFR) can be serious, most boys recover without a problem, although they have lost a protective membrane and may be at risk for some complications."
http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/for-parents/help-with-forcible-foreskin-retraction/
The Immunological #Functions of #Foreskin
Enzymes and immune components are secreted by the foreskin’s mucous membranes, fighting off pathogens and disease. According to a report on the Immunological functions of the human prepuce, these immune components include:
cathepsin B
lysozyme
chymotrypsin
neutrophil elastase
cytokine
These components, like the secretions from vaginal mucosa in a female, are important for protecting the penis from infection.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1758142/pdf/v074p00364.pdf
Here are a few links:
Open letter to a circumciser:
https://youtu.be/MZCdbQzkcfM
Functions of foreskin:
Part One
https://youtu.be/K6h8-J5319Q
Part Two
https://youtu.be/yDnoX7gGZ-o
~*~
#ChildCircumcision, An #ElephantInTheHospital:
https://youtu.be/Ceht-3xu84I
~*~
Birth as we know it: Circumcision - The Primal Wound
https://youtu.be/XmX6RdRNoqk
~*~
Step by Step routine procedure:
https://youtu.be/W2PKdDOjooA
Three types of routine procedure:
https://youtu.be/GjUCR44qZLE
~*~