I was at an office Christmas reception yesterday. A young woman did the Pfizer Flop. Standing there fine, then Boom! Down she goes. She didn’t die, but she was taken away by ambulance. My wife asked her friend if she had health issues. No! She didn’t. My wife asked if she had recently been boosted. Hmmm, yes she had.
The problem is most of those 7 million already knew the vax is dangerous. Good reinforcement, but we need to get it out to the sleepy wokesters like the twit critics. Guaranteed they haven't watched it, and their insults are reflexive. Malone's new book Lies My Government Told Me, describes reality as a mental model that each of us uses to compare with inputs from our senses. Anything we see, hear, or feel that conflicts with that model creates cognitive dissonance that many (most?) people can't handle, so they ignore it, or attack it. More competent people will analyze the conflict first, and update our model if the analysis shows it's useful. But that capability has been indoctrinated out of several generations of victims of the failed education system. So they don't accept the new evidence because they don't want to, and because they don't know how to process it if they did want to. Took us several generations to get us to this sorry state, and will take several generations more to recover -- after we start recovery. They won't go there voluntarily. They perceive they're in their safe space, and they're terrified to leave it. The quickest solution is to destroy their safe spaces. But most of them aren't worth the effort. Maybe someone cares enough to help them.
I understood that if a treatment was administered under an EUA, that if any recipients were injured or died after receiving said treatment, that the DEFAULT position was supposed to be that it was that treatment that caused the injury or death, UNLESS it could be proven otherwise. This means that every single injury or death that happened to Covid injection recipients was the result of said injection, and the onus is on them to prove that this is not so.
Unless relevant fraud can be proven, which would dissolve the liability shield in an uncorrupted part of judicial system, if one can be found to try the cases. The existence of relevant fraud is obvious, but finding an uncorrupted part of judicial system is very unlikely, so sadly your take is spot on in my view.
Hey at least you are doing your honest best trying to figure it out. Much respect for that. I've been working at understanding what the heck is true for years and I'm shocked anew every week. So here it is: there is no controversy and the truth is dark. You are at the stage that you should scan my book. You might also pick up The Real Anthony Fauci (3$ ebook) My book should be on amazon in a fortnight. Here's a free copy: https://dl.bookfunnel.com/t2feeen29q
Thank you for the book. I will order on Amazon as soon as it is available. I started reading it last night and it was engrossing - particularly the content on psychopaths.
I don't know what the term is but I think there might be one for a tactic of information warfare where you use absurdity to discredit that which could illuminate your points of vulnerability. Almost like shaming or ridicule, but covert. You appear sincere (heart in the right place) but people with a little digging determine you're an idiot and discredit anything you put forward. If you look into Peter's background, it looks like he's vulnerable - compromised? This is war and who you can trust is difficult to determine. I came across a youtube video about "priming" that really shook me up. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRAKt0GakJM It illustrates how you can be exposed to something and primed to behave a particular way without there being any connection you can perceive between the primer and the behavior. And intelligence agencies have had unlimited time and budgets to perfect this.
You're right - I worry too much, but it may not be enough.
I looked at the substack and you're right. Here's what I commented: Well, this flipped the false flag switch for me on Stew Peters. When I went on his podcast, it stunk of over-the-top, and it didn't seem to be economic. Kirsch was fooled, and this was credible for me. I'm so far into this material that I didn't notice the clues at the beginning of the vid. Thanks for elucidating.
Great comment. Qanon is an operation designed to subject the Right to ridicule. My email Is yoho.robert@gmail.com. Contact me there and I'll get you a way to download Butchered free. It's a minor viral hit.
I am taking one example (if true) that can be (and is being) used to discredit the entire premise of the film. It doesn't matter if it's one out of thousands or one out of millions - it is essential the film be accurate because it is attacking the veracity of the establishment narrative and the establishment will fight back - effectively. If the makers of the film are willing to mislead so blatantly, with something so easily verified, it makes me wonder if they were paid to do it. To take someone famous and imply they died when they didn't is beyond the pale. If it's true Peters, et al, did this, I would be embarrassed to be involved with them - and I'm frustrated, because it means I can't use it or recommend it to my relatives who are lining up for boosters. This is so serious and I'm so frustrated. I feel like I'm living Invasion of the Body Snatchers and the people I keep looking to for help almost seem to make things worse. Which again, makes me think they're like double agents.
And it is not my intention to mislead anyone. That's why I don't want to pass along things that can be disproven. Because that WOULD be seen as an attempt to deceive.
Somewhat disagree. The errors contaminate an otherwise useful effort. As truth continues to emerge the horrid decisions made by officials are becoming obvious without the need to sensationalize. That truth obviously has taken much too long to arrive, to get around the efforts to suppress truth.
Great effort by Stew. Strange how Team Jab lies through its teeth about data and outcomes and studies and remains credible while Team Freedom is reported sunk by a single error. (The DoD data presented in Ron Johnson's hearing was discredited almost immediately by the government claiming the high numbers were due to a software glitch but, according to Matthew Crawford, the glitch was planned and the data coverup was a resounding success.
I would not want to be associated with a film that implied people were falling over, dying, when they actually didn't die. It's either sloppy journalism or willful manipulation for nefarious purposes.
The example I read was about Keyontae Johnson who fainted on the basketball court but did not die. Why use that footage at all? If there is a problem with the vaccines, then make sure your facts are unassailable or you lose all credibility. And I wonder if that's Stew Peter's true goal - to sensationalize things so much that holes can be shot through so no one will believe him.
I would love to be told the information I came across is incorrect and that the film never showed Johnson fainting. I'd have to go back through the film and search for that scene which I can't do right now. But I will as soon as I get some time.
I was on Stew's podcast and my impression was he was out for the sensational. I do not throw stones and assume people have their hearts in the right place, however.
I am not gifted in prose and do not have the skill to be tactful. I apologize for offending. I am simply frustrated that going on the third year, there is still debate as to whether the jabs are safe and effective - or time bombs leading to extinction. It's ridiculous. I rewatched the film and although I didn't watch every frame closely, I did not see the "fainting" of that particular athlete in the film. It wouldn't be the first lie ever quickly thrown up to discredit the vaccine resistant. And I think it's interesting no one seems to be discrediting the fibrous tissue/clots that embalmers are insisting are new. That was really the crux of the film's proof so attacks only on the peripheral scenes imply they've got nothing.
I still think the film did not need any sensationalizing, though. It's a horror show all on its own and any embellishment leaves an opening to dismiss it. I really wonder if anybody could watch it and not think about what could be growing inside them or their loved ones. Truly horrific.
Hey at least you are doing your honest best trying to figure it out. Much respect for that. I've been working at understanding what the heck is true for years and I'm shocked anew every week. So here it is: there is no controversy and the truth is dark. You are at the stage that you should scan my book. You might also pick up The Real Anthony Fauci (3$ ebook) My book should be on amazon in a fortnight. Here's a free copy: https://dl.bookfunnel.com/t2feeen29q
There are many injuries worse than quick death. I would worry more about the cancersxand alzheimers that take longer to appear. They're just as deadly. The quick deaths are just the first wave, the canaries dying in the coal mine that is about to explode. The film is entirely credible. People don't faint for no reason.
Kim, you are taking one example out of thousands and implying yours is the real point of view, but that is faulty. Do your own research but dont intentionally try to mislead others. As the anecdotal evidence gathered by hundreds of individuals looking at obituaries shows that globally, people are dying in unprecidented amounts in their sleep, children at play or athletes doing their job.... the death rate is way over and above the baseline standard of death. those examples shown in that video are small samplings of people who literally were dead before they hit the ground. This is a horrific death cult at work.
Everything you say is true but Kim made a good point that if you use even one piece of information and is not factual it discredits the entire production. That's what we operate under today. We don't have room for mistakes in this movement.
You’ve raised an interesting issue. Is there a way to red pill people? We have certainly failed, for the most part so far. I’ve found one thing that shook up some
Young lefties. The Left is a monolith. Everyone believes nearly exactly the same thing on all issues. Have the person convince you they have done a lot of work on every issue. Let them make their best case. Then hit them with Israel. ‘Is Israel correct in saying West Bank is theirs? Or is it Palestine?’ Of course it’s Palestine. And they’ve done the work. They think. Then take them through the whole history of West Bank - unorganized territory to a part of Trans Jordan to the war which Israel took it to Jordan ceding WB to Israel. It was never Palestine. Then I ask ‘did you know any of that?’ Of course they don’t. I then say everything you think has been told to you by the same group of people. You haven’t done any work as you haven’t independently researched any of it. This shocks them. And because it’s not integral to them personally they can hear it. Now their armour has been weakened. I then hit them with stats regarding the vax. They actually listened. A young couple both of whom had been double vaxed didn’t get their booster as a result of that conversation.
However it might be possible to red pill many people if we put our heads together and tried different things.
Same issues surround the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the propaganda surrounding varioius claims. Trying to get to truth often requires a lot of reading. The modern person today has TL:DR syndrome. Today's PR has become quite advanced.
I watched the movie but I personally refrain from passing it out to anyone that isn't already in the know. You can create a lot of mental trauma and induce a nocebo effect overriding the placebo effect when the thoughts of harming themselves start to take hold. You will be the bearer of bad news which will not be forgotten. Red pillers such as Whitney Webb, Johnny Vedmore, G. Edward Griffin, James Corbett, Iain Davis that go through the sorted history of the Anglo-American Empire merging with organized crime are less traumatic to those that drank the koolaide or have close family members that have been harmed. Just my view.
A few ppl that did watch it who think the vaccines are safe. The only thing they heard is when they played the MSM saying they were safe especially for pregnancy. They didn’t hear them correct it.
This isn't a question of a mistake (maybe). I know that the people I would show this to would immediately "fact check" and find this item about Johnson and in their minds, it would actually make them even more secure in their position. They're not going to look at the film and think 90% of it is right - they won't even bother looking at it. They'll run the other way crying, "MISINFORMATION!". I am just so angry about this level of "reporting". Peters did not have to fabricate one second of footage to get the message across. Just listening to Edward Dowd indicates the terrifying spot we're in.
I was at an office Christmas reception yesterday. A young woman did the Pfizer Flop. Standing there fine, then Boom! Down she goes. She didn’t die, but she was taken away by ambulance. My wife asked her friend if she had health issues. No! She didn’t. My wife asked if she had recently been boosted. Hmmm, yes she had.
Good for your wife for bringing attention to the obvious
The problem is most of those 7 million already knew the vax is dangerous. Good reinforcement, but we need to get it out to the sleepy wokesters like the twit critics. Guaranteed they haven't watched it, and their insults are reflexive. Malone's new book Lies My Government Told Me, describes reality as a mental model that each of us uses to compare with inputs from our senses. Anything we see, hear, or feel that conflicts with that model creates cognitive dissonance that many (most?) people can't handle, so they ignore it, or attack it. More competent people will analyze the conflict first, and update our model if the analysis shows it's useful. But that capability has been indoctrinated out of several generations of victims of the failed education system. So they don't accept the new evidence because they don't want to, and because they don't know how to process it if they did want to. Took us several generations to get us to this sorry state, and will take several generations more to recover -- after we start recovery. They won't go there voluntarily. They perceive they're in their safe space, and they're terrified to leave it. The quickest solution is to destroy their safe spaces. But most of them aren't worth the effort. Maybe someone cares enough to help them.
gotta try
I understood that if a treatment was administered under an EUA, that if any recipients were injured or died after receiving said treatment, that the DEFAULT position was supposed to be that it was that treatment that caused the injury or death, UNLESS it could be proven otherwise. This means that every single injury or death that happened to Covid injection recipients was the result of said injection, and the onus is on them to prove that this is not so.
Doesn't matter. The EUA absolves all liability. If they did EUA for a bullet to the head, they could shoot anyone they want with impunity.
Unless relevant fraud can be proven, which would dissolve the liability shield in an uncorrupted part of judicial system, if one can be found to try the cases. The existence of relevant fraud is obvious, but finding an uncorrupted part of judicial system is very unlikely, so sadly your take is spot on in my view.
Now now, don't be giving them any ideas...!
This is big. Any way we can find out if there are any executive orders or legally written comments on this?
Katherine Watt writes a substack "Bailiwick News" that gets into this in incredible detail. It's a fabulous substack but a real thicket of thorns.
Thank you.
❤️❤️
Hey at least you are doing your honest best trying to figure it out. Much respect for that. I've been working at understanding what the heck is true for years and I'm shocked anew every week. So here it is: there is no controversy and the truth is dark. You are at the stage that you should scan my book. You might also pick up The Real Anthony Fauci (3$ ebook) My book should be on amazon in a fortnight. Here's a free copy: https://dl.bookfunnel.com/t2feeen29q
I greatly appreciate any critique or edits. Yoho.robert@gmail.com
Thank you for the book. I will order on Amazon as soon as it is available. I started reading it last night and it was engrossing - particularly the content on psychopaths.
I want to link to this substack I just came across that was quoted by a substack I follow. It expresses clearly what I was trying to get across about in my tactless comments on Died Suddenly: https://jackanapes.substack.com/p/died-suddenly-is-typical-trash-from?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=email
I don't know what the term is but I think there might be one for a tactic of information warfare where you use absurdity to discredit that which could illuminate your points of vulnerability. Almost like shaming or ridicule, but covert. You appear sincere (heart in the right place) but people with a little digging determine you're an idiot and discredit anything you put forward. If you look into Peter's background, it looks like he's vulnerable - compromised? This is war and who you can trust is difficult to determine. I came across a youtube video about "priming" that really shook me up. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRAKt0GakJM It illustrates how you can be exposed to something and primed to behave a particular way without there being any connection you can perceive between the primer and the behavior. And intelligence agencies have had unlimited time and budgets to perfect this.
You're right - I worry too much, but it may not be enough.
I looked at the substack and you're right. Here's what I commented: Well, this flipped the false flag switch for me on Stew Peters. When I went on his podcast, it stunk of over-the-top, and it didn't seem to be economic. Kirsch was fooled, and this was credible for me. I'm so far into this material that I didn't notice the clues at the beginning of the vid. Thanks for elucidating.
Great comment. Qanon is an operation designed to subject the Right to ridicule. My email Is yoho.robert@gmail.com. Contact me there and I'll get you a way to download Butchered free. It's a minor viral hit.
I am taking one example (if true) that can be (and is being) used to discredit the entire premise of the film. It doesn't matter if it's one out of thousands or one out of millions - it is essential the film be accurate because it is attacking the veracity of the establishment narrative and the establishment will fight back - effectively. If the makers of the film are willing to mislead so blatantly, with something so easily verified, it makes me wonder if they were paid to do it. To take someone famous and imply they died when they didn't is beyond the pale. If it's true Peters, et al, did this, I would be embarrassed to be involved with them - and I'm frustrated, because it means I can't use it or recommend it to my relatives who are lining up for boosters. This is so serious and I'm so frustrated. I feel like I'm living Invasion of the Body Snatchers and the people I keep looking to for help almost seem to make things worse. Which again, makes me think they're like double agents.
And it is not my intention to mislead anyone. That's why I don't want to pass along things that can be disproven. Because that WOULD be seen as an attempt to deceive.
I concluded that you are right today and reposted. Thanks and best
You worry too much. This thing is substantial and accurate. We have to try.
Somewhat disagree. The errors contaminate an otherwise useful effort. As truth continues to emerge the horrid decisions made by officials are becoming obvious without the need to sensationalize. That truth obviously has taken much too long to arrive, to get around the efforts to suppress truth.
Great effort by Stew. Strange how Team Jab lies through its teeth about data and outcomes and studies and remains credible while Team Freedom is reported sunk by a single error. (The DoD data presented in Ron Johnson's hearing was discredited almost immediately by the government claiming the high numbers were due to a software glitch but, according to Matthew Crawford, the glitch was planned and the data coverup was a resounding success.
All true but no excuse exists for the issues w Stu's post. Best and thanks for comment
I would not want to be associated with a film that implied people were falling over, dying, when they actually didn't die. It's either sloppy journalism or willful manipulation for nefarious purposes.
The example I read was about Keyontae Johnson who fainted on the basketball court but did not die. Why use that footage at all? If there is a problem with the vaccines, then make sure your facts are unassailable or you lose all credibility. And I wonder if that's Stew Peter's true goal - to sensationalize things so much that holes can be shot through so no one will believe him.
I would love to be told the information I came across is incorrect and that the film never showed Johnson fainting. I'd have to go back through the film and search for that scene which I can't do right now. But I will as soon as I get some time.
I was on Stew's podcast and my impression was he was out for the sensational. I do not throw stones and assume people have their hearts in the right place, however.
I am not gifted in prose and do not have the skill to be tactful. I apologize for offending. I am simply frustrated that going on the third year, there is still debate as to whether the jabs are safe and effective - or time bombs leading to extinction. It's ridiculous. I rewatched the film and although I didn't watch every frame closely, I did not see the "fainting" of that particular athlete in the film. It wouldn't be the first lie ever quickly thrown up to discredit the vaccine resistant. And I think it's interesting no one seems to be discrediting the fibrous tissue/clots that embalmers are insisting are new. That was really the crux of the film's proof so attacks only on the peripheral scenes imply they've got nothing.
I still think the film did not need any sensationalizing, though. It's a horror show all on its own and any embellishment leaves an opening to dismiss it. I really wonder if anybody could watch it and not think about what could be growing inside them or their loved ones. Truly horrific.
❤️❤️
Hey at least you are doing your honest best trying to figure it out. Much respect for that. I've been working at understanding what the heck is true for years and I'm shocked anew every week. So here it is: there is no controversy and the truth is dark. You are at the stage that you should scan my book. You might also pick up The Real Anthony Fauci (3$ ebook) My book should be on amazon in a fortnight. Here's a free copy: https://dl.bookfunnel.com/t2feeen29q
I greatly appreciate any critique or edits. Yoho.robert@gmail.com
There are many injuries worse than quick death. I would worry more about the cancersxand alzheimers that take longer to appear. They're just as deadly. The quick deaths are just the first wave, the canaries dying in the coal mine that is about to explode. The film is entirely credible. People don't faint for no reason.
Yes cred for those of us who know but no excuse for the issues. See my post today. Best
Kim, you are taking one example out of thousands and implying yours is the real point of view, but that is faulty. Do your own research but dont intentionally try to mislead others. As the anecdotal evidence gathered by hundreds of individuals looking at obituaries shows that globally, people are dying in unprecidented amounts in their sleep, children at play or athletes doing their job.... the death rate is way over and above the baseline standard of death. those examples shown in that video are small samplings of people who literally were dead before they hit the ground. This is a horrific death cult at work.
Yes, insurance data, live birth figures from many countries, etc etc all horrifying
Everything you say is true but Kim made a good point that if you use even one piece of information and is not factual it discredits the entire production. That's what we operate under today. We don't have room for mistakes in this movement.
If you have not seen it, this one is also important: https://rumble.com/v1vh8js-the-big-reset-movie-great-reset-plandemic-and-vaccines-documentary.html
Thanks, I'll check it out! Dr. Yoho what do you think of Dr. Ana's work?
Who's that
Here's her substack. Quite frightening if true. https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/thoughts-and-comments-about-died?r=p12mg&utm_medium=android
Exactly right. I reposted today after consideration. Best
You’ve raised an interesting issue. Is there a way to red pill people? We have certainly failed, for the most part so far. I’ve found one thing that shook up some
Young lefties. The Left is a monolith. Everyone believes nearly exactly the same thing on all issues. Have the person convince you they have done a lot of work on every issue. Let them make their best case. Then hit them with Israel. ‘Is Israel correct in saying West Bank is theirs? Or is it Palestine?’ Of course it’s Palestine. And they’ve done the work. They think. Then take them through the whole history of West Bank - unorganized territory to a part of Trans Jordan to the war which Israel took it to Jordan ceding WB to Israel. It was never Palestine. Then I ask ‘did you know any of that?’ Of course they don’t. I then say everything you think has been told to you by the same group of people. You haven’t done any work as you haven’t independently researched any of it. This shocks them. And because it’s not integral to them personally they can hear it. Now their armour has been weakened. I then hit them with stats regarding the vax. They actually listened. A young couple both of whom had been double vaxed didn’t get their booster as a result of that conversation.
However it might be possible to red pill many people if we put our heads together and tried different things.
Same issues surround the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the propaganda surrounding varioius claims. Trying to get to truth often requires a lot of reading. The modern person today has TL:DR syndrome. Today's PR has become quite advanced.
I have noticed those that knock Died Suddenly do not bring any receipts. Who is lying is obvious.
I watched the movie but I personally refrain from passing it out to anyone that isn't already in the know. You can create a lot of mental trauma and induce a nocebo effect overriding the placebo effect when the thoughts of harming themselves start to take hold. You will be the bearer of bad news which will not be forgotten. Red pillers such as Whitney Webb, Johnny Vedmore, G. Edward Griffin, James Corbett, Iain Davis that go through the sorted history of the Anglo-American Empire merging with organized crime are less traumatic to those that drank the koolaide or have close family members that have been harmed. Just my view.
A few ppl that did watch it who think the vaccines are safe. The only thing they heard is when they played the MSM saying they were safe especially for pregnancy. They didn’t hear them correct it.
I did not know you were in it. Gonna watch it again!!
This isn't a question of a mistake (maybe). I know that the people I would show this to would immediately "fact check" and find this item about Johnson and in their minds, it would actually make them even more secure in their position. They're not going to look at the film and think 90% of it is right - they won't even bother looking at it. They'll run the other way crying, "MISINFORMATION!". I am just so angry about this level of "reporting". Peters did not have to fabricate one second of footage to get the message across. Just listening to Edward Dowd indicates the terrifying spot we're in.
It's dystopian
Worst thing is we have real hypnotized zombies