They are throwing so many crises and worries at us these days that I just have basically retreated in to prayer.
David Martin impressed me and puzzled me and caused me suspicions about his fast talking, flimflam demeanor. He said the reason he got in to the “COVID” thing was something like he saw “them now coming after the children.” That seemed good. It also seemed good that he gave links to public information substantiating that the special kind of “COVID vaccines” were being worked on like as early as 2013.
I remember looking up biographical info on Dr. Martin PhD and still being left with my suspicions about him, I guess simply from the way he presented, but not necessarily the content of his presentations.
As for the fakeologist, been there, done that. I was briefly on his email list but dropped out in 2018. Something not quite right about his looking in to the facts of 9-11-01.
So I won’t be taking any sides in that difference of opinion.
I guess I have been in the conspiracy corner for so many years that many of the subjects being brought up now just seem like deja vu all over again.
Here is one irritating bit of news from the Blinkin / Nuland quarter.
Victoria Nuland, married to Robert Kagan of PNAC neoconservative gang, has been in every presidential administration since Clinton’s 1993, excepting Trump administration.
We are hearing more and more about the old neoconservative gang lately. They were warmongers and evildoers and destroyers of the USA from the beginning.
Here is today's latest from her boss, Antony Blinken at the U S State Department, warmonger extraordinaire.
Here is a quote from the Project for a New American Century ( PNAC ) position paper, Rebuilding America’s Defenses…available on Archive.org
One line from the "coming out document" of the "American neocons" in year 2000, the document "Project for a New American Century" stated as follows.
"And advanced forms of biological warfare
that can “target” specific genotypes may
transform biological warfare from the realm
of terror to a politically useful tool. "
Our deep state military have for decades known how to target certain genotypes. This is a very powerful and efficient way of killing people, their stock and trade.
_____
2 Thessalonians 2:7
"For the mystery of iniquity already worketh: only that he who now holdeth do hold, until he be taken out of the way"
Mathew Crawford called out David Martin as controlled op & part of the weird religion. I learned to not read too much into things until I start hearing the same info from a couple of trusted sources. I trust Mathew - & he has a verifiable real person background (my son was a fan of his Art of Problem Solving curriculum). The fact that much of your posts verify other info I’ve vetted has made me trust you as well. I think it’s important when someone can explain their thought process when they are informing others. Over time if their presentation is always slick with no hesitations or occasional change of mind then I get a feeling that I’m either being played (ie David Martin), or the person is in over their head & talking out their ass (Alex Berenson). I’m sure there are more but I’m always on the look out now that I know we’re in the matrix.
You’ve made a bit of a fool of yourself by debunking archaeology. You really should read things before deciding they aren’t true or not because your comments about the anunnaki are going to come back and haunt you. It’s going to be one of those things you kick yourself for
If you give it no credence, then it means you think the bible is a load of crap and nothing but a fairy story. I thought you would have been interested in archaeology
I have been disconnected since 9/11 permanently and even before that. But finding a truthful and honest replacement is most difficult. My trust factor for just about everything is barely bouncing off the zero line.
I so agree. I have found aspirin vs ibuprofen and Tylenol is a big lie also. Ibuprofen and Tylenol are much more dangerous. My first tip was the 4 shelves full of the ibuprofen etc at Walmart compared to the 12 inches of aspirin shelf space on the bottom. Did a deep dive. Aspirin has many health benefits.
Try and shut them down I reckon. In nz we’ve got a couple of them shutting down. The comments sections is just lots of hate against the which has put advertisers off. Many small business owners spend lots on advertising but not in propaganda outlets
Wow. Yep. I continue to follow my inner guidance even if and when I don't know why I am not trusting a particular persona like David Martin and Miki Willis, and others mentioned here. Truth is always here and being revealed if we stay open. Thank you for modeling integrity to the best of your ability Robert. More to all and less to none. Living Truth aka InfiniteLoveIAM, we all prosper.
I admit that I don't always under stand David Martin when he discusses patents but I thought he was sincere so I was disappointed to read and realize my perception of Martin may be inaccurate. It seems like the “side” we are on is even smaller than I realized with fewer honest and trustworthy people. That's disappointing.
That piece on David Martin has a lot of great research, but poor quality of reasoning. I'm skeptic of him and the article both tbh.
It reads like the classic accusations of every member of the "no virus" team, who btw never seem to debate Martin's main argument, and go past it to define the existence of viruses or not as the central issue of the world, an extremely flawed analysis in my view.
Reminds me of the interview Alec Zeck did with Martin, where he was like a 10 year old bashing his head against a wall to try to understand no matter how many times or in how many ways Martin explained it.
David Martin is suspicious as hell, but his points are way more solid than many others who became famous during the covid event, so idk what to do with it. (I've watched nearly every video in his YT channel btw)
I forgot to mention another thing: the nano tech angle I mostly agree with you Yoho, but the situation is much more diverse and wide than just Ana Maria Mihalcea. There are teams of researchers in Spain, Argentina, and other countries, that don't have the same red flags Ana has, and look far more "grass roots" imo and more humble in their contributions. They have also supposedly found graphene oxide at the very least and other suspicious things that don't match with the official narrative of what the vaccines contain.
I'm adding this just for context in case anyone cares
the vaxes are packed with a random assortment of variously toxic material. The question here is whether graphene oxide is anything but another one. I doubt it.
Yeah to me the vax seems more and more like a red herring, if they wanted to kill us or weaken us with it, it just doesn't make sense. You can poison populations with water, air, food, energy and so on. And chemtrails are 100% confirmed as afaik.
I try to think what's something that ONLY a direct injection could do, and imo it has to be either:
A test for certain technology.
A distraction, with real damage but to act as a limited hangout.
A real crazy alien kind of shit that can't be done through all other contamination methods.
Perhaps the financial angle is also worth considering, it might've been a huge money laundering operation.
Chem trails are nowhere near 100% confirmed. My very specific assertion is that there is still no direct evidence that the trails you see in the sky are sprayed chemicals vs airplane exhaust.
some countries admitted it already, like mexico, and spain, and others ofc talk about potential projects of spraying their populations with chemicals to combat outbreaks. For sun blocking purposes I think these days they call it aerosol injection, but for others the term varies.
Don't get me wrong, I don't think anything is 100%, but I meant that it's so probable by enormous amount of circumstantial evidence that I have to assume its true.
It's like the vaccines, do I know if they're harmful? not really. But you know where we are with that.
My last thought is that the main conveyor of the chemtrail theories (wigginton) is deliberately misleading in his videos and completely wrong on some technical points which makes everything he says without direct evidence highly questionable.
There is a much more informed fellow that talks about climate interference science and he does not claim that all the trails in the sky are chemicals. Quite the contrary. He points out that jet fuel was modified and consolidated in the 90s which resulted in higher soot output of jet engines which creates larger and longer lasting contrails. That is direct evidence of contrails.
He talks about other programs and talk of spraying but never claims what you see in the sky is spraying. I am pretty sure the psychopathic folks who are out to get us are happy about the chemtrail theory -- the fact that wigginton has never been censored is a real sign -- because it creates fear every time people look up at the sky. That is what they want.
I also contend that the lack of direct evidence of chemical spraying compared with the very certain evidence of contrails forming from exhaust makes it unlikely. The chemtrail theory has many holes not least of which is the vast number of people who would have to be involved and the cost borne by commercial airlines would be enormous in an extrenely cost sensitive business.
My contention regarding chemtrails is very specific. I dispute that the trails you see in the sky at 20000+ are not sprayed chemicals.
I know many cray scientists have proposed it. I know some countries have experimented but i content there is no evidence that commercial airliners you see crossing the sky creating trails are part of a spraying operation.
I know vaccines are harmful because there is plenty of direct evidence to support it. The only question there is how harmful. We don't have the levels of study to quantify it but there is most certainly a lot of direct evidence of harm.
Twice now I have gone through Wiggington's documentary with a fine toothed comb. Within the first 10 minutes, I know for certain his comments about jet engines are simply wrong. He is not an engineer, and I am. Before we even get half way through I had documented dozens of misleading claims for which he claims definitive proof where no such thing exists. He is masterful at taking a few facts and weaving them into a story that is emotional and compelling, but relies entirely on a host of unproven assumptions.
Wiggington is simply not credible given all these problems.
I also point out that his site and his documentary have been on Youtube and the web fully accessible by Google for a long long time. They clearly don't think his claims are a threat, and it's almost as if they want you looking up at the sky thinking every single plane is spraying you with toxic chemical vs exhaust. Same goes for facebook. They never censor the chemtrails posts, and in fact they seem to promote posts of people showing contrails in the sky. This alone should be plenty of evidence to question his claims.
He talks about the dangers of geoengineering and the crazy stuff they're talking about doing. But he never claims the trails you see in the sky from commercial airliners are chemicals. Quite the opposite, he talks about how the composition of jet fuel changed starting in 1988 (to unify jet fuel standards across NATO) and that created a high soot fuel which results in more contrails. Why doesn't Wiggington talk about this? Frankly, it's because he's scare mongering.
Now Jim Lee talks about why this jet fuel exhaust is problematic, and it is changing the climate because it whitens the skies, and that may very well be deliberate. But it's not because they're spraying chemicals, it's because we're flying a lot more planes with dirty exhaust.
That is the climate change. All the real facts are laid out by Lee. People should stop listening to Wiggington who is basically promoted by the deep state assets and we should all be asking why.
Don’t underestimate the panic angle. You’re right. If they simply wanted to poison us there are clandestine ways. But it appears they’re conditioning us to accept there’s doom lurking around every corner that we can’t control. So we’re reliant on third-party solutions to save us from absolute peril. I predict a cyber attack that paralyzes the nation is in the cards. Then online anonymity will be a thing of the past. Tracking will keep us safe!
Mihalcea is not a native English speaker, so typos and odd diction in quickly written articles are not necessarily indicative of a ghostwriter.
If graphene is used as a sort of chemical scaffold in the manufacture of the injections, that does not necessarily imply graphene is present in the final product.
The dark field microscopy images Nixon, et al, show are intriguing to me. I have absolutely no way of knowing if the light-like entities are artifacts of the microscope or something else. Many of the forms just look like normal crystals to me, but the non-rectilinear objects do not. I would love to hear a rational explanation or identification of what those are.
Mihalcea recommends near infrared light, I think. I could be wrong. Anyway, other doctors have recommended this, too, especially since starting to distrust the Pharma/Military/Industrial/Governmental/etc. takeover of humanity.
Mihalcea loses me when she starts talking about everyone in the world having these bots in their blood, but maybe that is because I do not want it to be true.
I too have heard of several different "microscopic" analyses and watched way too many videos. The problem is there is absolutely no way to validate anything we see in the videos.
To identify graphene, you need multiple samples and I believe a spectral analysis, not a microscope.
The nanobot technology simply doesn't add up and there is no compelling evidence to suggest it exists to what they claim.
And also, some of these other people I mention do have other red flags imo, such as acting like their findings and vials are universally applicable and therefore anyone who even dares to talk about spike protein, DNA contamination, SV40, etc., are just controlled opposition. Same as the No Virus Team, which is heavily referenced and admired in those "microscopy" circles.
May I? Today I filed with the Portland VA MC that i wanted a Homeopathic ND for my primary care provider. I no longer have faith in Big Pharma MD healthcare system. I spoke with the Care Nurse, Scheduler, Vet Advocate, Community CareProvider for the VA. They do not have as front of mind awareness that they exist for the peace, safety and happiness of Veterans. We shall see.
This article is a reminder to me to focus a greater proportion of my energy on my local, in person relationships. I appreciate the efforts to sniff out and expose dishonest people, but it can become very distracting for me and not good for my mental well being. When I find myself learning that that podcast host who I thought was being sincere might not be, it reminds me that I’m not a kid in need of a leader. My freedom and sovereignty is largely my responsibility, and my job is to surround my actual living self with trustworthy people as much as possible. People on screens are not my friends. Pissed off moms hosting Potlucks and parties will save the world. Mark my words.
With regards to the nanotech. Deciding something is bullshit and providing no evidence to back up your assertion isn’t a good look. I am keeping an open mind until there is actual evidence to make a decision on this topic. What was it that made you decide it was bullshit? Was it the unqualified opinion of someone you trust. What evidence did they provide that it was bullshit or did you just take their word for it? I’m interested to find out what made you decide it was bullshit because I’d love to see evidence that supports either opinion
Actually Robert, I seem to remember sending you a book and telling you to RTFB. The Sitchin books on archaeology. Judging by your comments, you chose not to RTFB LOL
The thing I is, Paul has made a right fool of himself. Some archaeologists used the bible as a map and discovered all the old cities of the bible. When they dug them up they found the worlds very first civilisation. They found Ashurbanipals library and hundreds of thousand of clay tablets describing their data to day life.
So the stuff they found under the desert have now been studied for 100s of year by scholars. Even the writes of the bible had access to them.
Once they go through all the tablets and translate them with a handy lexicon they found, the books of Zechariah zitchin are academic book describing the translations and the beliefs of the Sumerians. These tablets legitimise the bible and have much mire detail than the bible. Like the story of Noah .
A polymath is someone who is considered very smart in a couple of different topics. They don’t know most topics at all. Just really good at a couple and Paul has really shown this limitation in what he said
He’s made archaeology out to be something completely different because instead of just reading it, he guessed what it may say. Maybe he listened to someone else that he shouldn’t have as he’s really made a fool of himself. And if he reads the Sitchin books, he will probably realise be about page 10 about pretty bloody stupid it was to comment on something he has no prior knowledge off
Rob, I wasn't entirely clear whether you wrote the initial section about the bankers or if it was someone else, but I'm glad you're posting about it. I would have loved to listen in on the lecture and meet Ivor as well. I will have to follow up later this week and catch up on everything there.
I was never fooled and always highly suspicious of the graphene nano-bot nonsense from day one. I commented the same when you wrote your stack a few weeks back. Not only is the evidence unconvincing (I remember using microscopes, and you can see a lot of weird looking things without being able to identify them), but I'm somewhat familiar with how computers work, and definitely how telecommunications work, and none of the theories being presented made any sense from both a technological and communication perspective.
I've lost count of how many people broadcasting "bluetooth" videos I've had to debunk for folks who have sent them my way.
I feel the exact same way about DEWs, which I also think Dave P is wrong about.
But he was right about the moon landing although it wasn't his arguments that convinced me.
I had the exact same reaction to Martin as you. I also know a little about patents, and his broad based claims from very early in the pandemic were pretty overreaching and relied on folks who don't really understand patents IMO. So that was a big red warning flag whenever someone does that.
So we're on the same page right now on most things, except maybe the DEWs.
I spoke to two people on the ground in Maui and it sure appears that the jackals are after the land.
Cowan: Wiki accuses him of being a conspiracy theorist, he lost his medical license, and several other things including being a member of the board of directors of the Weston A. Price Foundation. Sounds like a good dude.
I also believe it highly possible those in power started or allowed the fire to burn. That is a separate and distinct question from whether DEWs were used. Good ol' gasoline works just fine. Ask the guy in Canada who just got convicted of starting 15+ fires in Quebec last summer. Gas works really well.
Cowan can be a good dude and still be wrong. In his case, I have no reason to doubt his sincerity, or Ardis' for that matter -- though I don't trust Stew Peters at all. I think it is entirely plausible that Cowan is sincere but mistaken. I need to dig into it more when I get the time to really read his work in depth, but I know the one specific case I looked into with a very credentialed and trusted Lab PhD and MD, he was simply wrong.
I have questions. First, no doubt something quite nefarious got kicked into overdrive in America on March (Fri) 13, 2020. The day Trump declared the pandemic a national emergency.
I have no trouble believing that most everything we were told from that point forward was a manipulation to herd us into preexisting siloes.
Additionally it appears most of the self-anointed freedom fighters bubbling to the surface over the ensuing years are highly suspect controlled opposition.
But I have problems with two things. First, no one has sufficiently explained what it was that sickened enough people to touch off the pandemic campaign of terror.
They are splintered into sub groups that believe;
No viruses have ever existed. None. Ever.
Or, that only Covid-19 never existed.
Or, that Covid-19 was influenza rebranded. Or, Covid-19 was the resurrected Spanish Flu.
Or, Covid-19 was actually an RNA virus cloned to DNA and strategically released in targeted locations.
Or, the whole event was actually snake venom in the water.
Or, it was a poison aerosolized via chem trails.
Or, it was actually 5G radiation sickening people. No virus needed.
Anyone besides me see a problem here?
The second issue are the claims of transhumanism. I’m tired of the phrase, “self-assembling nanobots.” Just what the hell is that supposed to mean?
Yeah, I know the broad definitions. I’ve heard them all. But I have a background in electronics and understand how microchips work. I know what microwave energy is. I understand biology. And, this noise about how we’re all infected with graphene nano particles crossing the blood brain barrier bombarded by 5G signals initiates a big, “Yeah, now what?”
I’m still waiting for the answer. Are we all just going to spontaneously combust? Be mind controlled? Infinitely tracked? Heart attacks? Cancer?
The concept that there’s no escape unless I make dozens of purchases for cleansing supplements and walk around with a faraday cage on my head seems highly suspicious.
It reminds me of how easily bamboozled people were starting in the 1950s over radiation. Gamma rays created The Hulk and Peter Parker was bitten by a radioactive spider. Right?
The bottom line is, it’s always the things we don’t understand that make us the biggest suckers for fakery. We have no idea how the cellphone works. We have no idea how they got away with the pandemic. Lots have spun off with no clarity or cohesion.
So I’ll ask again.
1) What sickened people?
2) What the hell is a self assembling graphene nanobot supposedly for?
You get a B for the semester and I'm sure if you keep reading you will improve, maybe enough to get into medical school ha. All the answers to your questions are in my archives, so dig in. Here's a quick review of your last 2 questions:
1) therapies were concealed that would have ended covid immediately. People were killed by medications used in hospital. Standards of care were ruined to kill and sicken more people. But worst of all, the covid vax was specifically designed to kill people
I’ve a friend. A learned guy that grew up around learned people. Mostly medical. Some law. Father in law was a college Dean.
My friend said on numerous occasions one of his father’s favorite sayings was, “Every asshole writes a book.”
The concern over information overload in his father’s quaint ink on paper bygone era has exploded in our digital age. TMI is a disease that allows societal cancers to metastasize untreated in plain sight.
My point which I’m at loath to explain is, every ‘asshole’ today writes a media missive. Whether it be on social media, big media, scientific media, political media, entertainment media, as yes, substack and good old fashioned books or their not so old fashioned digitized versions. TMI is everywhere.
What many still don’t understand is, the warriors we’re facing are experts at capturing mass attention and exploiting systemic human traits to achieve their predetermined goals.
If you believe that 17 million people were wiped off the face of the earth while most of your family, friends, neighbors and colleagues shrug, then you’ve got no choice but to also believe the program was a rousing success. Which should logically lead one to dig deep on how the hell that happened?
We go on all day about viruses vs exosomes, the benefits of a faraday caged existence, the inherent instability of RNA, the folly of PCR, ivermectin, NAC, vitamin D, 5G, and the rest of the golly gee whiz talk that splinters us. Georgia guidestones and DEWs anyone? But, really, what’s the point when obviously the machine marches on hiding in plain sight?
Are we targeting the machine? Are we coalesced in the fight? Or are we on information overload arguing with each other over technical minutiae? Is mRNA on the chopping block yet? Are our kids well informed? Are we shrinking violets when it comes to open conversation with our ignorant family members, neighbors, friends and colleagues?
The psyops is indeed deep. Military grade. Is it being exposed and dismantled? Are the controlled opposition facing opposition? Like all wars we are in the midst of a banker’s war. Forget following the science. Follow the money and you’ll have your answers.
Now figure out how to convince the unconvinced without looking like a splintered group of whack a doodles.
Mr. Webb is right we need to alarm rich people. Because they’ve got a target on their backs too. They just don’t see it because they think they’re special.
And, as Webb points out they are special. That’s why they’re being saved for desert.
They are throwing so many crises and worries at us these days that I just have basically retreated in to prayer.
David Martin impressed me and puzzled me and caused me suspicions about his fast talking, flimflam demeanor. He said the reason he got in to the “COVID” thing was something like he saw “them now coming after the children.” That seemed good. It also seemed good that he gave links to public information substantiating that the special kind of “COVID vaccines” were being worked on like as early as 2013.
I remember looking up biographical info on Dr. Martin PhD and still being left with my suspicions about him, I guess simply from the way he presented, but not necessarily the content of his presentations.
As for the fakeologist, been there, done that. I was briefly on his email list but dropped out in 2018. Something not quite right about his looking in to the facts of 9-11-01.
So I won’t be taking any sides in that difference of opinion.
I guess I have been in the conspiracy corner for so many years that many of the subjects being brought up now just seem like deja vu all over again.
Here is one irritating bit of news from the Blinkin / Nuland quarter.
Victoria Nuland, married to Robert Kagan of PNAC neoconservative gang, has been in every presidential administration since Clinton’s 1993, excepting Trump administration.
We are hearing more and more about the old neoconservative gang lately. They were warmongers and evildoers and destroyers of the USA from the beginning.
Here is today's latest from her boss, Antony Blinken at the U S State Department, warmonger extraordinaire.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/world/middle-east-facing-most-dangerous-period-in-50-years-blinken-warns-after-3-us-soldiers-killed-in-jordan-5576618?utm_source=Goodevening&src_src=Goodevening&utm_campaign=gv-01-30-2024&src_cmp=gv-01-30-2024&utm_medium=email&est=1saI1lJkAjYPoh9JGqeZJNSdVZLeZUl%2BbhpVPIsy1KUf7c6cMC5P6ve9660XQZuh
(Audio reading of the article available there.)
Here is a quote from the Project for a New American Century ( PNAC ) position paper, Rebuilding America’s Defenses…available on Archive.org
One line from the "coming out document" of the "American neocons" in year 2000, the document "Project for a New American Century" stated as follows.
"And advanced forms of biological warfare
that can “target” specific genotypes may
transform biological warfare from the realm
of terror to a politically useful tool. "
Our deep state military have for decades known how to target certain genotypes. This is a very powerful and efficient way of killing people, their stock and trade.
_____
2 Thessalonians 2:7
"For the mystery of iniquity already worketh: only that he who now holdeth do hold, until he be taken out of the way"
https://biblehub.com/drbc/2_thessalonians/2.htm
I cling to the cross of Jesus Christ, the One Who is Truth.
Mathew Crawford called out David Martin as controlled op & part of the weird religion. I learned to not read too much into things until I start hearing the same info from a couple of trusted sources. I trust Mathew - & he has a verifiable real person background (my son was a fan of his Art of Problem Solving curriculum). The fact that much of your posts verify other info I’ve vetted has made me trust you as well. I think it’s important when someone can explain their thought process when they are informing others. Over time if their presentation is always slick with no hesitations or occasional change of mind then I get a feeling that I’m either being played (ie David Martin), or the person is in over their head & talking out their ass (Alex Berenson). I’m sure there are more but I’m always on the look out now that I know we’re in the matrix.
I agree with your take on Matthew Crawford’s thoughtful analysis of those whom he has determined as likely being controlled opposition.
I don’t trust David Martin either. More so now after reading this article.
exactly
While I enjoyed this post...
Wow.
I'm a born skeptic, and haven't listened/read any MSM for 5 years.
I only believe, maybe, 20% of what I read.
After Oct. 7th, that has been dialed down to 10%.
Gonna have to re-read tomorrow in it's entirety before passing judgement.
Honestly, some of this shit really gets confusing...
The real morons claim they can figure it all out by listening to many MSM sources.
You’ve made a bit of a fool of yourself by debunking archaeology. You really should read things before deciding they aren’t true or not because your comments about the anunnaki are going to come back and haunt you. It’s going to be one of those things you kick yourself for
If you give it no credence, then it means you think the bible is a load of crap and nothing but a fairy story. I thought you would have been interested in archaeology
3 years unconnected to MSM. Aiming for as many years as needed.
I have been disconnected since 9/11 permanently and even before that. But finding a truthful and honest replacement is most difficult. My trust factor for just about everything is barely bouncing off the zero line.
I so agree. I have found aspirin vs ibuprofen and Tylenol is a big lie also. Ibuprofen and Tylenol are much more dangerous. My first tip was the 4 shelves full of the ibuprofen etc at Walmart compared to the 12 inches of aspirin shelf space on the bottom. Did a deep dive. Aspirin has many health benefits.
In the Corps Motrin is called grunt candy and it given out for anything that hurts
Try and shut them down I reckon. In nz we’ve got a couple of them shutting down. The comments sections is just lots of hate against the which has put advertisers off. Many small business owners spend lots on advertising but not in propaganda outlets
Wow. Yep. I continue to follow my inner guidance even if and when I don't know why I am not trusting a particular persona like David Martin and Miki Willis, and others mentioned here. Truth is always here and being revealed if we stay open. Thank you for modeling integrity to the best of your ability Robert. More to all and less to none. Living Truth aka InfiniteLoveIAM, we all prosper.
David Martin wears a bow tie. Enough said. 😉
I totally agree! I’m always suspicious of a bow tie wearer! 😂
I admit that I don't always under stand David Martin when he discusses patents but I thought he was sincere so I was disappointed to read and realize my perception of Martin may be inaccurate. It seems like the “side” we are on is even smaller than I realized with fewer honest and trustworthy people. That's disappointing.
If you do not understand it, you are generally being played
👊
He is very misleading regarding the patents IMO relying on the fact most people don't understand them or their purpose.
General Smedley Butler tried to tell everyone this in his 1935 book War is a Racket, but nobody seemed to pick up on it.
That piece on David Martin has a lot of great research, but poor quality of reasoning. I'm skeptic of him and the article both tbh.
It reads like the classic accusations of every member of the "no virus" team, who btw never seem to debate Martin's main argument, and go past it to define the existence of viruses or not as the central issue of the world, an extremely flawed analysis in my view.
Reminds me of the interview Alec Zeck did with Martin, where he was like a 10 year old bashing his head against a wall to try to understand no matter how many times or in how many ways Martin explained it.
David Martin is suspicious as hell, but his points are way more solid than many others who became famous during the covid event, so idk what to do with it. (I've watched nearly every video in his YT channel btw)
I forgot to mention another thing: the nano tech angle I mostly agree with you Yoho, but the situation is much more diverse and wide than just Ana Maria Mihalcea. There are teams of researchers in Spain, Argentina, and other countries, that don't have the same red flags Ana has, and look far more "grass roots" imo and more humble in their contributions. They have also supposedly found graphene oxide at the very least and other suspicious things that don't match with the official narrative of what the vaccines contain.
I'm adding this just for context in case anyone cares
the vaxes are packed with a random assortment of variously toxic material. The question here is whether graphene oxide is anything but another one. I doubt it.
Yeah to me the vax seems more and more like a red herring, if they wanted to kill us or weaken us with it, it just doesn't make sense. You can poison populations with water, air, food, energy and so on. And chemtrails are 100% confirmed as afaik.
I try to think what's something that ONLY a direct injection could do, and imo it has to be either:
A test for certain technology.
A distraction, with real damage but to act as a limited hangout.
A real crazy alien kind of shit that can't be done through all other contamination methods.
Perhaps the financial angle is also worth considering, it might've been a huge money laundering operation.
the covid vax is a step up from the last big killer, HPV, which was worse than all the previous ones, and all these are a net harm.
these health destructions are clearly not fakes, they are meant to weaken us, divide and conquer. See https://robertyoho.substack.com/p/275-almost-everything-scares-me-these. best
Chem trails are nowhere near 100% confirmed. My very specific assertion is that there is still no direct evidence that the trails you see in the sky are sprayed chemicals vs airplane exhaust.
some countries admitted it already, like mexico, and spain, and others ofc talk about potential projects of spraying their populations with chemicals to combat outbreaks. For sun blocking purposes I think these days they call it aerosol injection, but for others the term varies.
Don't get me wrong, I don't think anything is 100%, but I meant that it's so probable by enormous amount of circumstantial evidence that I have to assume its true.
It's like the vaccines, do I know if they're harmful? not really. But you know where we are with that.
do your reading at least here and you will understand that all vaccines are harmful; I will not reiterate all the proofs here
My last thought is that the main conveyor of the chemtrail theories (wigginton) is deliberately misleading in his videos and completely wrong on some technical points which makes everything he says without direct evidence highly questionable.
There is a much more informed fellow that talks about climate interference science and he does not claim that all the trails in the sky are chemicals. Quite the contrary. He points out that jet fuel was modified and consolidated in the 90s which resulted in higher soot output of jet engines which creates larger and longer lasting contrails. That is direct evidence of contrails.
He talks about other programs and talk of spraying but never claims what you see in the sky is spraying. I am pretty sure the psychopathic folks who are out to get us are happy about the chemtrail theory -- the fact that wigginton has never been censored is a real sign -- because it creates fear every time people look up at the sky. That is what they want.
I also contend that the lack of direct evidence of chemical spraying compared with the very certain evidence of contrails forming from exhaust makes it unlikely. The chemtrail theory has many holes not least of which is the vast number of people who would have to be involved and the cost borne by commercial airlines would be enormous in an extrenely cost sensitive business.
My contention regarding chemtrails is very specific. I dispute that the trails you see in the sky at 20000+ are not sprayed chemicals.
I know many cray scientists have proposed it. I know some countries have experimented but i content there is no evidence that commercial airliners you see crossing the sky creating trails are part of a spraying operation.
I know vaccines are harmful because there is plenty of direct evidence to support it. The only question there is how harmful. We don't have the levels of study to quantify it but there is most certainly a lot of direct evidence of harm.
Not so for the chemtrails theory.
sounds optimistic
you should listen to Dane Wiggington
Twice now I have gone through Wiggington's documentary with a fine toothed comb. Within the first 10 minutes, I know for certain his comments about jet engines are simply wrong. He is not an engineer, and I am. Before we even get half way through I had documented dozens of misleading claims for which he claims definitive proof where no such thing exists. He is masterful at taking a few facts and weaving them into a story that is emotional and compelling, but relies entirely on a host of unproven assumptions.
Wiggington is simply not credible given all these problems.
I also point out that his site and his documentary have been on Youtube and the web fully accessible by Google for a long long time. They clearly don't think his claims are a threat, and it's almost as if they want you looking up at the sky thinking every single plane is spraying you with toxic chemical vs exhaust. Same goes for facebook. They never censor the chemtrails posts, and in fact they seem to promote posts of people showing contrails in the sky. This alone should be plenty of evidence to question his claims.
You should listen to Jim Lee here: https://reinettesenumsfoghornexpress.substack.com/p/jim-lee-of-climateviewer-joins-reinette
He talks about the dangers of geoengineering and the crazy stuff they're talking about doing. But he never claims the trails you see in the sky from commercial airliners are chemicals. Quite the opposite, he talks about how the composition of jet fuel changed starting in 1988 (to unify jet fuel standards across NATO) and that created a high soot fuel which results in more contrails. Why doesn't Wiggington talk about this? Frankly, it's because he's scare mongering.
Now Jim Lee talks about why this jet fuel exhaust is problematic, and it is changing the climate because it whitens the skies, and that may very well be deliberate. But it's not because they're spraying chemicals, it's because we're flying a lot more planes with dirty exhaust.
That is the climate change. All the real facts are laid out by Lee. People should stop listening to Wiggington who is basically promoted by the deep state assets and we should all be asking why.
Don’t underestimate the panic angle. You’re right. If they simply wanted to poison us there are clandestine ways. But it appears they’re conditioning us to accept there’s doom lurking around every corner that we can’t control. So we’re reliant on third-party solutions to save us from absolute peril. I predict a cyber attack that paralyzes the nation is in the cards. Then online anonymity will be a thing of the past. Tracking will keep us safe!
you are on track but you cannot predict the future
No liability. Simple. People chose to take part in the genocide jab. Best way to do it
Mihalcea is not a native English speaker, so typos and odd diction in quickly written articles are not necessarily indicative of a ghostwriter.
If graphene is used as a sort of chemical scaffold in the manufacture of the injections, that does not necessarily imply graphene is present in the final product.
The dark field microscopy images Nixon, et al, show are intriguing to me. I have absolutely no way of knowing if the light-like entities are artifacts of the microscope or something else. Many of the forms just look like normal crystals to me, but the non-rectilinear objects do not. I would love to hear a rational explanation or identification of what those are.
Mihalcea recommends near infrared light, I think. I could be wrong. Anyway, other doctors have recommended this, too, especially since starting to distrust the Pharma/Military/Industrial/Governmental/etc. takeover of humanity.
Mihalcea loses me when she starts talking about everyone in the world having these bots in their blood, but maybe that is because I do not want it to be true.
I too have heard of several different "microscopic" analyses and watched way too many videos. The problem is there is absolutely no way to validate anything we see in the videos.
To identify graphene, you need multiple samples and I believe a spectral analysis, not a microscope.
The nanobot technology simply doesn't add up and there is no compelling evidence to suggest it exists to what they claim.
Agreed.
And also, some of these other people I mention do have other red flags imo, such as acting like their findings and vials are universally applicable and therefore anyone who even dares to talk about spike protein, DNA contamination, SV40, etc., are just controlled opposition. Same as the No Virus Team, which is heavily referenced and admired in those "microscopy" circles.
No virus team has no Koch postulate fulfillment on their side, which is credible.
See my takedown of this micro robot nonsense here; https://robertyoho.substack.com/p/290-a-few-less-things-to-worry-about
4 teams in nz
I’ve tried but if his wife is with him mumbling and offering nothing, I just can’t. Sorry. I’m sure she is lovely. 🤷🏼♀️😏
The Great Taking Documentary is currently streaming for free on Children's Health Defense:
https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/videos/the-great-taking/
May I? Today I filed with the Portland VA MC that i wanted a Homeopathic ND for my primary care provider. I no longer have faith in Big Pharma MD healthcare system. I spoke with the Care Nurse, Scheduler, Vet Advocate, Community CareProvider for the VA. They do not have as front of mind awareness that they exist for the peace, safety and happiness of Veterans. We shall see.
This article is a reminder to me to focus a greater proportion of my energy on my local, in person relationships. I appreciate the efforts to sniff out and expose dishonest people, but it can become very distracting for me and not good for my mental well being. When I find myself learning that that podcast host who I thought was being sincere might not be, it reminds me that I’m not a kid in need of a leader. My freedom and sovereignty is largely my responsibility, and my job is to surround my actual living self with trustworthy people as much as possible. People on screens are not my friends. Pissed off moms hosting Potlucks and parties will save the world. Mark my words.
With regards to the nanotech. Deciding something is bullshit and providing no evidence to back up your assertion isn’t a good look. I am keeping an open mind until there is actual evidence to make a decision on this topic. What was it that made you decide it was bullshit? Was it the unqualified opinion of someone you trust. What evidence did they provide that it was bullshit or did you just take their word for it? I’m interested to find out what made you decide it was bullshit because I’d love to see evidence that supports either opinion
Mark, for christ's sake RTFB before you comment. https://robertyoho.substack.com/p/290-a-few-less-things-to-worry-about
I don’t believe anything until I get an explanation and I don’t disbelieve anything without an explanation.
Hi Mark!
Have you read my latest Substack Tamara. It’s more of an academic discussion document to promote debate
https://open.substack.com/pub/healthcarenotmedicine/p/the-health-system-is-a-tool-of-oppression?r=1e6k8r&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
Hi Tamara, how’s things. I hope all is good with you
My dude
I’m still waiting for that one bit of evidence to settle the matter either way
Actually Robert, I seem to remember sending you a book and telling you to RTFB. The Sitchin books on archaeology. Judging by your comments, you chose not to RTFB LOL
The thing I is, Paul has made a right fool of himself. Some archaeologists used the bible as a map and discovered all the old cities of the bible. When they dug them up they found the worlds very first civilisation. They found Ashurbanipals library and hundreds of thousand of clay tablets describing their data to day life.
So the stuff they found under the desert have now been studied for 100s of year by scholars. Even the writes of the bible had access to them.
Once they go through all the tablets and translate them with a handy lexicon they found, the books of Zechariah zitchin are academic book describing the translations and the beliefs of the Sumerians. These tablets legitimise the bible and have much mire detail than the bible. Like the story of Noah .
A polymath is someone who is considered very smart in a couple of different topics. They don’t know most topics at all. Just really good at a couple and Paul has really shown this limitation in what he said
He’s made archaeology out to be something completely different because instead of just reading it, he guessed what it may say. Maybe he listened to someone else that he shouldn’t have as he’s really made a fool of himself. And if he reads the Sitchin books, he will probably realise be about page 10 about pretty bloody stupid it was to comment on something he has no prior knowledge off
The article about the bankers was incredible. I agree that the Fed should be abolished and central banking outlawed.
Ron Paul has been saying that for over a decade. And he’s been 100% right.
Rob, I wasn't entirely clear whether you wrote the initial section about the bankers or if it was someone else, but I'm glad you're posting about it. I would have loved to listen in on the lecture and meet Ivor as well. I will have to follow up later this week and catch up on everything there.
I was never fooled and always highly suspicious of the graphene nano-bot nonsense from day one. I commented the same when you wrote your stack a few weeks back. Not only is the evidence unconvincing (I remember using microscopes, and you can see a lot of weird looking things without being able to identify them), but I'm somewhat familiar with how computers work, and definitely how telecommunications work, and none of the theories being presented made any sense from both a technological and communication perspective.
I've lost count of how many people broadcasting "bluetooth" videos I've had to debunk for folks who have sent them my way.
I feel the exact same way about DEWs, which I also think Dave P is wrong about.
But he was right about the moon landing although it wasn't his arguments that convinced me.
I had the exact same reaction to Martin as you. I also know a little about patents, and his broad based claims from very early in the pandemic were pretty overreaching and relied on folks who don't really understand patents IMO. So that was a big red warning flag whenever someone does that.
So we're on the same page right now on most things, except maybe the DEWs.
I would love to get your take on Tom Cowan...
I spoke to two people on the ground in Maui and it sure appears that the jackals are after the land.
Cowan: Wiki accuses him of being a conspiracy theorist, he lost his medical license, and several other things including being a member of the board of directors of the Weston A. Price Foundation. Sounds like a good dude.
I also believe it highly possible those in power started or allowed the fire to burn. That is a separate and distinct question from whether DEWs were used. Good ol' gasoline works just fine. Ask the guy in Canada who just got convicted of starting 15+ fires in Quebec last summer. Gas works really well.
Cowan can be a good dude and still be wrong. In his case, I have no reason to doubt his sincerity, or Ardis' for that matter -- though I don't trust Stew Peters at all. I think it is entirely plausible that Cowan is sincere but mistaken. I need to dig into it more when I get the time to really read his work in depth, but I know the one specific case I looked into with a very credentialed and trusted Lab PhD and MD, he was simply wrong.
Thank You for the Anna & Nixon info. I was seriously wondering, then WHY are other Docs not speaking of this?!? 🙏🏽❤️🙏🏽
It's nonsense from start to finish. Once you see falsehoods, you know the rest is the same.
I have questions. First, no doubt something quite nefarious got kicked into overdrive in America on March (Fri) 13, 2020. The day Trump declared the pandemic a national emergency.
I have no trouble believing that most everything we were told from that point forward was a manipulation to herd us into preexisting siloes.
Additionally it appears most of the self-anointed freedom fighters bubbling to the surface over the ensuing years are highly suspect controlled opposition.
But I have problems with two things. First, no one has sufficiently explained what it was that sickened enough people to touch off the pandemic campaign of terror.
They are splintered into sub groups that believe;
No viruses have ever existed. None. Ever.
Or, that only Covid-19 never existed.
Or, that Covid-19 was influenza rebranded. Or, Covid-19 was the resurrected Spanish Flu.
Or, Covid-19 was actually an RNA virus cloned to DNA and strategically released in targeted locations.
Or, the whole event was actually snake venom in the water.
Or, it was a poison aerosolized via chem trails.
Or, it was actually 5G radiation sickening people. No virus needed.
Anyone besides me see a problem here?
The second issue are the claims of transhumanism. I’m tired of the phrase, “self-assembling nanobots.” Just what the hell is that supposed to mean?
Yeah, I know the broad definitions. I’ve heard them all. But I have a background in electronics and understand how microchips work. I know what microwave energy is. I understand biology. And, this noise about how we’re all infected with graphene nano particles crossing the blood brain barrier bombarded by 5G signals initiates a big, “Yeah, now what?”
I’m still waiting for the answer. Are we all just going to spontaneously combust? Be mind controlled? Infinitely tracked? Heart attacks? Cancer?
The concept that there’s no escape unless I make dozens of purchases for cleansing supplements and walk around with a faraday cage on my head seems highly suspicious.
It reminds me of how easily bamboozled people were starting in the 1950s over radiation. Gamma rays created The Hulk and Peter Parker was bitten by a radioactive spider. Right?
The bottom line is, it’s always the things we don’t understand that make us the biggest suckers for fakery. We have no idea how the cellphone works. We have no idea how they got away with the pandemic. Lots have spun off with no clarity or cohesion.
So I’ll ask again.
1) What sickened people?
2) What the hell is a self assembling graphene nanobot supposedly for?
You get a B for the semester and I'm sure if you keep reading you will improve, maybe enough to get into medical school ha. All the answers to your questions are in my archives, so dig in. Here's a quick review of your last 2 questions:
1) therapies were concealed that would have ended covid immediately. People were killed by medications used in hospital. Standards of care were ruined to kill and sicken more people. But worst of all, the covid vax was specifically designed to kill people
2) This is a psy op, not a real thing and the photos were faked. See https://robertyoho.substack.com/p/290-a-few-less-things-to-worry-about and read it completely and carefully. this thing bothered me at first until I analyzed it.
See you around the study hall. I have a bad habit of bothering people during my breaks.
best wishes and take it easy on me in intramural hockey
I’ve a friend. A learned guy that grew up around learned people. Mostly medical. Some law. Father in law was a college Dean.
My friend said on numerous occasions one of his father’s favorite sayings was, “Every asshole writes a book.”
The concern over information overload in his father’s quaint ink on paper bygone era has exploded in our digital age. TMI is a disease that allows societal cancers to metastasize untreated in plain sight.
My point which I’m at loath to explain is, every ‘asshole’ today writes a media missive. Whether it be on social media, big media, scientific media, political media, entertainment media, as yes, substack and good old fashioned books or their not so old fashioned digitized versions. TMI is everywhere.
What many still don’t understand is, the warriors we’re facing are experts at capturing mass attention and exploiting systemic human traits to achieve their predetermined goals.
If you believe that 17 million people were wiped off the face of the earth while most of your family, friends, neighbors and colleagues shrug, then you’ve got no choice but to also believe the program was a rousing success. Which should logically lead one to dig deep on how the hell that happened?
We go on all day about viruses vs exosomes, the benefits of a faraday caged existence, the inherent instability of RNA, the folly of PCR, ivermectin, NAC, vitamin D, 5G, and the rest of the golly gee whiz talk that splinters us. Georgia guidestones and DEWs anyone? But, really, what’s the point when obviously the machine marches on hiding in plain sight?
Are we targeting the machine? Are we coalesced in the fight? Or are we on information overload arguing with each other over technical minutiae? Is mRNA on the chopping block yet? Are our kids well informed? Are we shrinking violets when it comes to open conversation with our ignorant family members, neighbors, friends and colleagues?
The psyops is indeed deep. Military grade. Is it being exposed and dismantled? Are the controlled opposition facing opposition? Like all wars we are in the midst of a banker’s war. Forget following the science. Follow the money and you’ll have your answers.
Now figure out how to convince the unconvinced without looking like a splintered group of whack a doodles.
Mr. Webb is right we need to alarm rich people. Because they’ve got a target on their backs too. They just don’t see it because they think they’re special.
And, as Webb points out they are special. That’s why they’re being saved for desert.