Same thing with the ads for catheters - I could not figure out why so many people were evidently using urinary catheters like never before. Every time I see something advertised more than usual, I wonder if it isn't connected to the adverse effects of the DNA-changing mRNA injections. Why not urinary leakage too? Cancer, heart disease, blood clots, psoriasis and on and on. Very few connect the dots. The cure is worse than the disease.
Get stuck on Diazide or Lasix and you can answer half your statement. Water Pills seem to make RR use more frequent, and it's easy to misjudge how much time you can hold urine. One elderly OB/GYN told me once the urge hits don't wait more than 5 minutes, it increases the risk of a UT.
Shingles JABS which we know are a side effect of the Jab are being highly advertised for that jab. Old Feinstein had a really bad case of them.
Good grief...what horror stories. I am 73 and to my knowledge have never had a PSA test. At this time in my life, I don't see the point. I have already decided to not have any radiation or chemo if I do get cancer. I will try natural remedies which I trust far more than anything the modern stone age medical system offers. This is advanced medicine? These butchers can hack on some one else. I will die eventually, but I will never sacrifice myself to these bozos.
I have a leakage problem that these pads will definitely help with. It's my mouth and my wife will say that after stuffing a sock in my mouth one of these pads will seal the deal.
I've never heard of this "product" before. Great reporting. This reminds me so much of the hysterectomy scam that is an "easy" butchering of women who don't need it, but makes for a nice boat payment.
I think the hysterectomy statistic is that 40 percent of American women get them. C sections are similar. The sweet spot for lowest mortality for the latter is 15 percent
Thank so much for an insightful review to prostate cancer which I will put to good use. I've been evaluating mine for 5 years. Two points I'd like to raise.
1. You advocate for laser surgery as the least invasive. But HIFU and cryo are minimally invasive too. What is your opinion of them?
2. You suggest MRI for investigation. Liquid biopy is now cutting edge with several players. What is your opinion of the new liquid biopsies?
Plus, insurance won't normally cover an MRI as a beginning test. You have to go through an entire series of testing before you're allowed to have an MRI.
Yes you have to pay for MRI. Otherwise you are left with a less precise estimate of what's going on. I don't know about HIFU vs laser but suspect it's less accurate because as I understand it, laser is done under MRI guidance. The cryo tech is older and less accurate. The diagnostic accuracy of these modalities is not the main point I was making. All these treaters are mostly doing unnecessary procedures on people who have little chance of benefiting. So my advice is take your time, do free consults with everyone you can, and walk slowly toward your decision. Most should do nothing or maybe just get one or two MRI directed biopsies. Start if you are early by never getting PSA to begin with. If you have metastatic prostate ca, a whole other set of decisions face you. The usual disclaimer: not medical advice use at your own risk etc. etc. etc.
I have not read all the comments, but I think a revision may be needed here, given the new incidence of turbo cancer of the prostate since the advent of Covid shots.
Mostly used in Nursing Homes, where there are too few Aids to change bed sheets. Plus they will add a Puddle Pad if they leak from being worn too long. Typical skin issues then occur just as they do for babies not changed often enough.
A medical doctor and a butcher wear the same coat for a similar reason
My father, a surgical orthopaedist, said that most men die with prostate cancer, rather than dying from it.
Thanks for an overview of this topic!!
Many Uros I know were all too happy to put patients through the PCA meat grinder. Money, power, control. Sound familiar?
Invaluable information! Thanks for the write up.
Same thing with the ads for catheters - I could not figure out why so many people were evidently using urinary catheters like never before. Every time I see something advertised more than usual, I wonder if it isn't connected to the adverse effects of the DNA-changing mRNA injections. Why not urinary leakage too? Cancer, heart disease, blood clots, psoriasis and on and on. Very few connect the dots. The cure is worse than the disease.
Get stuck on Diazide or Lasix and you can answer half your statement. Water Pills seem to make RR use more frequent, and it's easy to misjudge how much time you can hold urine. One elderly OB/GYN told me once the urge hits don't wait more than 5 minutes, it increases the risk of a UT.
Shingles JABS which we know are a side effect of the Jab are being highly advertised for that jab. Old Feinstein had a really bad case of them.
I saw ads for catheters for YEARS before covid. I always attributed it to the aging population.
Another really important topic. As usual, FOLLOW THE MONEY! Thanks again for all you are doing to wake people up!
Good grief...what horror stories. I am 73 and to my knowledge have never had a PSA test. At this time in my life, I don't see the point. I have already decided to not have any radiation or chemo if I do get cancer. I will try natural remedies which I trust far more than anything the modern stone age medical system offers. This is advanced medicine? These butchers can hack on some one else. I will die eventually, but I will never sacrifice myself to these bozos.
Here's a preview post as your prize:
https://robertyoho.substack.com/p/c005db8c-c52d-4a7d-a24e-d693512882cc
I have a leakage problem that these pads will definitely help with. It's my mouth and my wife will say that after stuffing a sock in my mouth one of these pads will seal the deal.
I've never heard of this "product" before. Great reporting. This reminds me so much of the hysterectomy scam that is an "easy" butchering of women who don't need it, but makes for a nice boat payment.
I think the hysterectomy statistic is that 40 percent of American women get them. C sections are similar. The sweet spot for lowest mortality for the latter is 15 percent
Lack of regulation, allowing lethal medicine for $$$, is just part of the plan to reduce the population:
The full PLAN exposed:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-plan-revealed
Thank so much for an insightful review to prostate cancer which I will put to good use. I've been evaluating mine for 5 years. Two points I'd like to raise.
1. You advocate for laser surgery as the least invasive. But HIFU and cryo are minimally invasive too. What is your opinion of them?
2. You suggest MRI for investigation. Liquid biopy is now cutting edge with several players. What is your opinion of the new liquid biopsies?
Tnx,
See below
Preview: https://robertyoho.substack.com/p/c005db8c-c52d-4a7d-a24e-d693512882cc
Plus, insurance won't normally cover an MRI as a beginning test. You have to go through an entire series of testing before you're allowed to have an MRI.
Yes you have to pay for MRI. Otherwise you are left with a less precise estimate of what's going on. I don't know about HIFU vs laser but suspect it's less accurate because as I understand it, laser is done under MRI guidance. The cryo tech is older and less accurate. The diagnostic accuracy of these modalities is not the main point I was making. All these treaters are mostly doing unnecessary procedures on people who have little chance of benefiting. So my advice is take your time, do free consults with everyone you can, and walk slowly toward your decision. Most should do nothing or maybe just get one or two MRI directed biopsies. Start if you are early by never getting PSA to begin with. If you have metastatic prostate ca, a whole other set of decisions face you. The usual disclaimer: not medical advice use at your own risk etc. etc. etc.
Thank-you!
Initially I rejected biopsy and went to Mayo for an MRI which Medicare paid for.
Nice. My friends have been cleared by the mri alone.
I have not read all the comments, but I think a revision may be needed here, given the new incidence of turbo cancer of the prostate since the advent of Covid shots.
Mostly used in Nursing Homes, where there are too few Aids to change bed sheets. Plus they will add a Puddle Pad if they leak from being worn too long. Typical skin issues then occur just as they do for babies not changed often enough.
https://truthcomestolight.com/500-australians-join-worlds-first/
Thanks Dr. Yoho. Small semblance of ethical prostate cancer emerging slowly in UK.
USA will always go for the making money option unfortunately.
UK information. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/prostate-cancer/treatment/
PSA surveillance is a mistake to begin with. The numbers do not support it. (Use this info st your own risk etc.)
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/the-kay-griggs-story-the-complete-interview-1998/
getting started on this
GEEZ