Dec 2, 2022·edited Dec 2, 2022Liked by Robert Yoho MD (ret)
I learned a long time ago to trust no one. Especially so on the internet. I will though lean towards trusting the likes of Alex Jones's before any media company. They need revenue, and lots of it, and will play with the news for views.
There are plenty of charlatans here on Substack or preachers of half truths. Then there are those who mean well but have a lousy BS meter.
I think it's just called humanism.
As I have come to appreciate from Jordon Peterson. Once you let free speech loose (which I advocate) the psychopaths take advantage to do their evil work. And, that is exactly the risk that Substack has in front of it, it can be a fatal risk too. This goes for Musk and Twitter also.
We must be on our guard not only for false, misleading data or narratives. But, also for purposefully crafted messages used for extreme evil. We have let the monsters out of the box buy or lack of concern for propoganda over the decades. We got fat and happy in the easiness of the West. Now, we are under attack and finding out our enemies have been surrounding us for decades.
This is not the time for a mental vacation. We are in middle of a information war that has dire consequences for the future.
It getting more difficult to trust anything about the last 3 years and the current effort to find the truth. It is easy to be bamboozled and faked out by various thugs who care only for themselves and what they can reap from other's fear and ignorance. It's a constant battle to find people and ideals that one can firmly believe in.
Yes, I believe the WEF and the elitists will fail in the long run. Since I am older, I don't have much to lose fighting back against tyranny. I don't know how I'd feel if I was 30-40-50 years younger. Without naming individuals ( in media, government, tech areas, the medical field, etc) there are some that are rock solid and I trust without a second thought, some that I flip-flop over and most I completely distrust or ignore.
"Although we face wealthy, patient foes who are getting away with murder, they are not unbeatable. There are only a few thousand of them and billions of us. As a group, we are far more dangerous than the psychopaths. They are hindered by fatal hubris, swallow transparent frauds, and believe collectivist ideas that have been tried and failed countless times. There is no Great and Powerful Oz behind the curtain. They are small, aging, terrified men holding up a soggy tissue of transhumanist delusions to shield themselves from death."
Dec 2, 2022·edited Dec 3, 2022Liked by Robert Yoho MD (ret)
I have figured Peters was either just a harmless, bumbling showman /hack or a paid misinformation master, luring honest specialists in like moths to a flame? Flypaper? with the purpose of making sure their messages are discredited. I lean toward the latter. But which of "his" specialists are part of the grift?
The person I am most curious about is Karen Kingston. She seems incredibly sincere, incredibly frustrated and full of ghastly information. I wish experts like Dr. Malone would critique her data. I figure it's either too hot to handle or doesn't merit the time and effort. But I'm not aware of anybody taking her seriously (except Stew Peters and he doesn't count, for all the reasons listed in this substack).
Who can you trust?
I can't find it now, but very recently, I came across Dr. Malone saying something to the effect that, of course, the mRNA gets into the DNA. He made some qualification that whether or not it has an effect is not known, but everybody with elementary science knows it does this. It came in response to the "bombshell" reports that it does this within as little as 6 hours. This came across to me like someone screeching a record. WHY is he saying this two years after the fact? Is he "normalizing" it? When I have time, I need to hunt this down, but what. the. heck?!
Descartes had it exactly right. "Question everything."
Everything. Even from sources that confirm our beliefs and theories. Especially from sources that confirm our beliefs and theories. That is true science. The scientific method. Also a Descartes design.
Fyi - Descartes had his famous dream that inspired his development of the scientific method in 1619. Coincidence?
"Individual civil liberties are our doctrine, not collectivist drivel about “the most good for the most people.” If most of us understood this, ruinous vaccines designed to prevent hypothetical future bioweapon attacks would never be considered. Openness—free speech—is the first American value. “Security clearances” and government secrecy are contrary to this, and censorship is the worst.
I read Cassandra and was really impressed with its breadth. Too broad for many modern readers, probably, but I like it. I'm disappointed in the frenzied ad hominems against Died Suddenly, though. But it's human nature for herd members to jump on bandwagon like that. I prefer to remain more focused on the specific issues. The main premise of the vid is unusually numbers of people are dying (suddenly) from unusual blockages (not clots) that began after the bax rollout. None of the frantic critics seem concerned about that. I am. Thosecwho worry about dramatic attention grabbers in media must have never encountered advertising or politics or Hollywood films. Deal with the issues.
Good analysis. Well-rounded and point for point. A healthy diet of this sort of analysis from all directions and in all directions can only be good epistemic hygiene at the very least. In this caes, it is on a matter that is so significant and substantive that our entire modern history has only one major event capable of competing with its narrative gravity, the causes and consequences of WWII. Fortunately for analysis, these events (WWII and Operation Covaids) are both essentially military operations conjoint with genocidal objectives. Germans being genocided led to WWII, and then they were genocided THROUGH the war, and the worst came at the end and after the war. Now we see Operation Covaids being the capstone of 80 years of strategic genocides masked as social and progressive policies, with the conservative elements of all involved political entities being there as a sort of corral to absorb resistent elements in society and hem in their reactionary possibilities into a controllable domain. These are clearly social engineering and Civil-Military operations. But Operation Covaids and WWII both involved massive propaganda pushes conjoint with massive economic and social upheavals engineered by those with the power of position to do so. And they happen to be the same institutions and agents, intergenerationally and in some cases there are still-living agents involved in both operations (some of whom have recently died supposedly, such as a certain Rothschild and a certain Windsor). So history is a treasure chest of data to confirm these epoch-scale event clusters and their organic relationships. Let's hope that any real historians out there can get to work in this direction because there is really not a better theoretical angle on the last 500 years that can be had, and the last 100 years is like a red neon arrow pointing to this treasure trove. I work in philosophy and can only perform, at this time, a generalist's service to the field of history and journalism. But this is the direction to go. For example, the work of Foucault is not without merit in this area, with specific regard to the general approach of the "archaeology of thought". While his focus in many areas, and his philosophical results, are easily brushed aside as somewhat arcane and nebulous, his work's approach was really a good idea, and his application to of that approach to the field of psychiatry in his "History of Madness" was phenomenally worthwhile. I'd hope that Dr. Szasz and Dr. Breggin had at more than a passing knowledge of it.
He explains proteins, coding into cells and changing DNA.
Gates has known about this for years and is changing the Human Genome with the assistance of Fauci, WHO, CDC, NHIS, Governments, Big Tech and Big Pharma. Hence C19, all Vaccines and Future Plandemics. We are in an ongoing experiment.
There is something larger the than Human Species behind our Evolution.
My expertise in these areas is derivative and I do not have skills outside of writing and podcasting. Despite my degrees, my role is as a popularizer. A lot of what you suggest is being done by better qualified people, and our role is to spread these messages. Thanks for your ideas and passion and keep up your good work. And yes that guy was a clear troll. I didn't realize it at first. Best
I looked through my pics and it seemed emblematic of healthcare. I'm open to a new one. That's a photo I took but sadly, the pig is disceased at the butcher's hand.
I learned a long time ago to trust no one. Especially so on the internet. I will though lean towards trusting the likes of Alex Jones's before any media company. They need revenue, and lots of it, and will play with the news for views.
There are plenty of charlatans here on Substack or preachers of half truths. Then there are those who mean well but have a lousy BS meter.
I think it's just called humanism.
As I have come to appreciate from Jordon Peterson. Once you let free speech loose (which I advocate) the psychopaths take advantage to do their evil work. And, that is exactly the risk that Substack has in front of it, it can be a fatal risk too. This goes for Musk and Twitter also.
We must be on our guard not only for false, misleading data or narratives. But, also for purposefully crafted messages used for extreme evil. We have let the monsters out of the box buy or lack of concern for propoganda over the decades. We got fat and happy in the easiness of the West. Now, we are under attack and finding out our enemies have been surrounding us for decades.
This is not the time for a mental vacation. We are in middle of a information war that has dire consequences for the future.
It getting more difficult to trust anything about the last 3 years and the current effort to find the truth. It is easy to be bamboozled and faked out by various thugs who care only for themselves and what they can reap from other's fear and ignorance. It's a constant battle to find people and ideals that one can firmly believe in.
Yes, I believe the WEF and the elitists will fail in the long run. Since I am older, I don't have much to lose fighting back against tyranny. I don't know how I'd feel if I was 30-40-50 years younger. Without naming individuals ( in media, government, tech areas, the medical field, etc) there are some that are rock solid and I trust without a second thought, some that I flip-flop over and most I completely distrust or ignore.
"Although we face wealthy, patient foes who are getting away with murder, they are not unbeatable. There are only a few thousand of them and billions of us. As a group, we are far more dangerous than the psychopaths. They are hindered by fatal hubris, swallow transparent frauds, and believe collectivist ideas that have been tried and failed countless times. There is no Great and Powerful Oz behind the curtain. They are small, aging, terrified men holding up a soggy tissue of transhumanist delusions to shield themselves from death."
Thanks, I needed that.
I have figured Peters was either just a harmless, bumbling showman /hack or a paid misinformation master, luring honest specialists in like moths to a flame? Flypaper? with the purpose of making sure their messages are discredited. I lean toward the latter. But which of "his" specialists are part of the grift?
The person I am most curious about is Karen Kingston. She seems incredibly sincere, incredibly frustrated and full of ghastly information. I wish experts like Dr. Malone would critique her data. I figure it's either too hot to handle or doesn't merit the time and effort. But I'm not aware of anybody taking her seriously (except Stew Peters and he doesn't count, for all the reasons listed in this substack).
Who can you trust?
I can't find it now, but very recently, I came across Dr. Malone saying something to the effect that, of course, the mRNA gets into the DNA. He made some qualification that whether or not it has an effect is not known, but everybody with elementary science knows it does this. It came in response to the "bombshell" reports that it does this within as little as 6 hours. This came across to me like someone screeching a record. WHY is he saying this two years after the fact? Is he "normalizing" it? When I have time, I need to hunt this down, but what. the. heck?!
Who can you trust?
Here's the link: https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/dr-robert-malone-yes-mrna-can-turn-into-dna-inside-cancer-cells/
Descartes had it exactly right. "Question everything."
Everything. Even from sources that confirm our beliefs and theories. Especially from sources that confirm our beliefs and theories. That is true science. The scientific method. Also a Descartes design.
Fyi - Descartes had his famous dream that inspired his development of the scientific method in 1619. Coincidence?
maybe that talk can help you with more ideas:
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/ed-dowd-covid-and-the-global-financial-collapse-a-tale-of-catastrophes-and-cover-ups/
"Ed Dowd discusses COVID and the Global Financial Collapse: A Tale of Catastrophes and Cover-Ups"
"Individual civil liberties are our doctrine, not collectivist drivel about “the most good for the most people.” If most of us understood this, ruinous vaccines designed to prevent hypothetical future bioweapon attacks would never be considered. Openness—free speech—is the first American value. “Security clearances” and government secrecy are contrary to this, and censorship is the worst.
Truer words never spoken.
INDIVIDUAL OVER COLLECTIVE.
I am firmly on this side.
I read Cassandra and was really impressed with its breadth. Too broad for many modern readers, probably, but I like it. I'm disappointed in the frenzied ad hominems against Died Suddenly, though. But it's human nature for herd members to jump on bandwagon like that. I prefer to remain more focused on the specific issues. The main premise of the vid is unusually numbers of people are dying (suddenly) from unusual blockages (not clots) that began after the bax rollout. None of the frantic critics seem concerned about that. I am. Thosecwho worry about dramatic attention grabbers in media must have never encountered advertising or politics or Hollywood films. Deal with the issues.
“As a group, we are far more dangerous than the psychopaths.”
Even as individuals, we are dangerous.
They need us more than we need them. That’s why they use propaganda.
Love this, Robert! Got to read that takedown of Stew Peters now...
Good analysis. Well-rounded and point for point. A healthy diet of this sort of analysis from all directions and in all directions can only be good epistemic hygiene at the very least. In this caes, it is on a matter that is so significant and substantive that our entire modern history has only one major event capable of competing with its narrative gravity, the causes and consequences of WWII. Fortunately for analysis, these events (WWII and Operation Covaids) are both essentially military operations conjoint with genocidal objectives. Germans being genocided led to WWII, and then they were genocided THROUGH the war, and the worst came at the end and after the war. Now we see Operation Covaids being the capstone of 80 years of strategic genocides masked as social and progressive policies, with the conservative elements of all involved political entities being there as a sort of corral to absorb resistent elements in society and hem in their reactionary possibilities into a controllable domain. These are clearly social engineering and Civil-Military operations. But Operation Covaids and WWII both involved massive propaganda pushes conjoint with massive economic and social upheavals engineered by those with the power of position to do so. And they happen to be the same institutions and agents, intergenerationally and in some cases there are still-living agents involved in both operations (some of whom have recently died supposedly, such as a certain Rothschild and a certain Windsor). So history is a treasure chest of data to confirm these epoch-scale event clusters and their organic relationships. Let's hope that any real historians out there can get to work in this direction because there is really not a better theoretical angle on the last 500 years that can be had, and the last 100 years is like a red neon arrow pointing to this treasure trove. I work in philosophy and can only perform, at this time, a generalist's service to the field of history and journalism. But this is the direction to go. For example, the work of Foucault is not without merit in this area, with specific regard to the general approach of the "archaeology of thought". While his focus in many areas, and his philosophical results, are easily brushed aside as somewhat arcane and nebulous, his work's approach was really a good idea, and his application to of that approach to the field of psychiatry in his "History of Madness" was phenomenally worthwhile. I'd hope that Dr. Szasz and Dr. Breggin had at more than a passing knowledge of it.
Stick to the facts so you won’t be the next victim in the lawsuit scam.
Research Dr Stephen C Meyer
Devine Intelligence
He explains proteins, coding into cells and changing DNA.
Gates has known about this for years and is changing the Human Genome with the assistance of Fauci, WHO, CDC, NHIS, Governments, Big Tech and Big Pharma. Hence C19, all Vaccines and Future Plandemics. We are in an ongoing experiment.
There is something larger the than Human Species behind our Evolution.
My expertise in these areas is derivative and I do not have skills outside of writing and podcasting. Despite my degrees, my role is as a popularizer. A lot of what you suggest is being done by better qualified people, and our role is to spread these messages. Thanks for your ideas and passion and keep up your good work. And yes that guy was a clear troll. I didn't realize it at first. Best
Worse. They are murdering us.
I looked through my pics and it seemed emblematic of healthcare. I'm open to a new one. That's a photo I took but sadly, the pig is disceased at the butcher's hand.