Discussion about this post

User's avatar
End tyranny's avatar

Malone is an egomaniac- that I am sure of - but now I see him for what he really is, an asset for the American intelligence apparatus. It's all making so much sense now.

Expand full comment
John Smith's avatar

I'm just so disappointed that Dr. Malone would do this.

First of all, I only tangentially heard that Dr. Breggin and Dr. Malone didn't get along. But I think Malone is extremely over-estimating how far and strongly Breggin's criticisms of Malone have taken hold. Proof - I'm subscribed to dozens of substacks, and have been reading them since Nov 2021. I don't recall one instance where Breggin's criticisms of Malone's were mentioned. Even on the other discussion boards where everyone is critical of the covid vaccine, I haven't seen them mentioned anywhere there either, and these are places where all the critical news/studies/commentaries on the covid vaccines are found, so I would say they are representative of the audience who might come across the Breggin-Malone beef. So I can't see how there is any material hit to Malone's reputation or standing. If anything, all of the New York Times and other corporate press articles present far greater examples of anything resembling defamation against Malone.

Let's look at what the lawyer states Malone has suffered: "in addition to the pain, suffering, insult, embarrassment, humiliation, and injury to his personal and professional reputations, publication of the Statements caused Dr. Malone to lose business and income, lost public appearances due to perceived reputational risk, and other special damages, including career damage, including loss of future employment, loss of future earnings, impaired and diminished earning capacity"

Reputationally, as I already said in the beginning, I don't think there's any case for that. And which public appearances did Malone miss because of Breggin? He seemed to be at the most recent conferences. If he DID get banned from some, it's not going to be because of Breggin, but because of some clueless MSM article that had a wide reach. And none of those are going to cite Breggin, they'll cite some vax-pushing hack.

I looked at the lawsuit - on page 8 the list of supposed defamatory claims begins: https://breggin.com/admin/fm/source/6905_breggin/Malone/Malone-V-Breggins-Complaint-10-30-22.pdf

There are 14 statements listed.

This one for instance, is entirely a philosophical disagreement between the two:

“The synonymous concepts of mass formation, mass hypnosis, and mass psychosis have an obvious damaging impact on the international health freedom movement and on the cause of liberty everywhere. These concepts take our eyes off the totalitarian global predators who are taking

over and exploiting humanity. They restrain us from charging these predators with criminal conspiracy if we win the battle with them. The pernicious effects of the Desmet/Malone ideology came fully into light with the recent publication of Desmet’s The Psychology of Totalitarianism and Malone’s continuing efforts in support of mass psychosis.”

How is that defamatory in any way? There are going to be strong disagreements over any differing sociological views. They basically have a disagreement on the nature of evil actors. Man, that's a debate that goes back millennia.

Again, another philosophical disagreement that is listed as a defamatory statement:

"Whether Desmet or Malone consciously intended it, their ideology has seriously harmful effects similar to a psyops — a psychological operation — aimed at paralyzing the health freedom movement and freedom movements worldwide.”

That's again a disagreement. Activists are going to have disagreements over theory - for example, is using the corporate social media such as Facebook beneficial for outreach, or is it 'playing into their hands.' Such disagreements can get heated, but how this approaches defamation is beyond me.

Another disagreement:

"“Desmet and Malone’s [mass formation psychosis] concept deflect, discourage and undermine attempts to place the blame directly on global predators who have been committing mass murder under the guise of COVID-19.”

Again, that's a wholly philosophical debate. You could write a book about the strength about one view (Breggin's) vs another (Malone's).

The only thing that remotely has any merit is whether Malone is "deep state" or "controlled opposition" or something. The thing is I've seen hundreds of people called that - I've never seen any lawsuits for being called that ever. Even people who are anti-deep state have been called "deep state actors" so I can't see how this is a serious and materially damaging hit on one's reputation.

Expand full comment
292 more comments...

No posts