You are angry. I get it. But I am more angry about COVID/genocide/Marxist cultural degeneration and much more. My point about Stu is clear and I can't believe his inaccuracies are unintended. Mistakes like these do not slip through on sophisticated platforms. All that said, if people can watch stew and not get gaslit by the nonsense, maybe he is doing some good.
Unfortunately the charlatans show up to capitalize on the drama for personal gain. This is what this hack Stu is doing. He found a nitch to make some coin on the back of a human disaster. Typical pond scum.
You beat me to it. Just read her excellent critique. Karen Kingston gives credit to Stew for at least doing something to put this horror out there. She knows the truth of what has been exposed now to more than 10M views. Perhaps a follow up to "Died Suddenly" with the scientific proof, provided in your link, to show exactly why there are biostructures growing in human bodies will be coming soon.
Maybe this explains it but from an amateur perspective, seems like the same drama could have been generated with pure facts. Your point is well taken tho. Maybe he's helping.
"Died Suddenly" is a limited hangout that failed. There was too much attention brought to the subject, and people are a lot more skeptical than they were two years ago.
Skepticism is our armor. As this has developed, Died Suddenly has done a lot of good and justifiably freaked out many people. Whether it was designed to fail or not, it seems to be a net positive now. Although my critics do not seem to understand my arguments, they are nevertheless being proven right!
Really? I thought we were better than this. The progressives have insulted us by saying we are country bumpkins if we think horse paste is going to cure us and we sit here taking pot shots at people who are working at sharing what they believe to be facts. Isn’t open dialogue what we need? Stew Peters knows how to promote discussions. So does Joe Rogan. The difference is Stew Peters took it a step further with his groundbreaking video Died Suddenly. No, there are no list of research reference materials offered at the end of the video, but I for one appreciate anyone who takes the risks necessary to counter the government propaganda and censorship problem plaguing our country.
That was my original reaction but on reflection the flaws are stupid and didn't have to be in there. Seem purposeful. Stew has plenty of time and money to avoid attacks by ensuring accuracy and avoiding those conspiracy theory images.
He had time to reflect and edit... as well as a staff who has time to reflect and edit. These weren't mistakes made on the fly. And including images of UFOs and big foot can't be chalked up to a "mistake". Those were very deliberately chosen.
Drama is part of Stew Peter’s style. It stimulates interest. The CDC used Zombie Apocalypse to promote emergency preparedness. Their program was a huge success. People will watch Died Suddenly who will never read a peer reviewed research paper on anything, but may be motivated to ask their health care provider questions that could result in saving their life. Hopefully the health care provider is also reading Substack since journals are also being censored.
I have no background in after life care, but there is no reason to believe that the many reports of unusual clots found during the embalming process are phony. There are also doctors who have interviewed embalmers reporting the clots. Embalmers are licensed professionals who would know when they see something odd.
He's saying the film included a few critical mistakes (including footage of someone collapse prior to the Vax rollout) mixed in with valid material. This is a classic tactic used by military intelligence to discredit resistance movements. Much of the film is fine but the mainstream will focus on the blatant falsehoods and anyone on the fence will lump everyone together into the "tinfoil hat" category. The footage of UFOs and Bigfoot (completely unnecessary and odd) is also a tactic which visually links the covid resistance movement to any and all conspiracies from the legitimate to the weird and wild. We will see more of this... The "powers that be" have been crafting the public image of "conspiracy nuts" since the dawn of time and it's going to intensify. It would behoove everyone to read up on psychological warfare tactics. We must be committed to truth with no lumpy gravy mixed in to muddy things.
I agree I don’t like all this concern about hyperbole and drama. If our government recommended and in some cases mandated a dangerous, toxic injection as all parties seem to agree, isn’t that dramatic? Why would you say ‘The government is pushing poison on us.’ And then scold someone for being dramatic about it? It’s the tamping down on the drama that makes me wonder if the message is true? What’s going on?
Nov 27, 2022·edited Nov 27, 2022Liked by Robert Yoho MD (ret)
Re the 'snake venom' bullshit theory: I suggest that we rethink it because: "... we know now that to learn what is likely true, we must notice what information is expertly sabotaged." Snake venom was brilliantly sabotaged.
I don't believe it explains everything, as the actual bioweapon attack is multi-pronged and multi-faceted. Here is a short summary of why I don't dismiss that *possibility* that snake (or animal) venom in some form is a part of the mix of this bio-battlefield part of the war.
Snake Venom Stew Peters and Brian Ardis:
I have come to think that snake venom is a part of the roll out, a part of the plan. The manner of the spread of the infection along administrative boundaries delineated by Dr. Yeadon (and others) supports that. The CIA used snake venom to test it as an invisible pathogen in the 1970s on the FBI building. It remained an undetected pathogen administered via their water system in a secure building filled with envenomated sick FBI employees. The CIA, in a congressional hearing on public record, revealed in detail how to deploy it in water systems, accommodating for chlorine, which neutralises it. It is also very easily aerosolised. The disadvantage of that method is that illness is not reliably predictable, a condition not required to create a plandemic of sickness that is mostly fictitious. (Hydroxychloroquine contains chlorine; and advocates of chlorine dioxide as a cure suggest that both may be effective in part, at least, because they may be neutralising the presence of venom, when it exists. Pierre Kory describes how different patients have different symptoms and require different treatment plans. This suggest that the various injections and or methods of infection may contain different dosages, of differing strengths, differing quality controls, and different ingredients from placebo, to contaminants, to even snake venom. )
In an interesting bit of science, it turns out that venom is used to cleave genes and there are venom peptides in the spike protein and/or other elements of the mystery soup that makes up the injections.
Snake (and animal) venom peptides attach to the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Nicotine and ivermectin are the best antidotes to this because both displace the venom peptides. The venom peptides that attach to the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors depress the breathing mechanism and slow the heart, mimicking respiratory illness. So, for this reason the respiratory response was incorrect. If covid was respiratory then smokers would be at high risk, and yet were only about 5% in a French study in early 2020. When this was pointed to the health officials, the following week the msn broadcast the importance of smokers to stop smoking immediately because they were 95% of the deaths. A total lie. Biden has signed law that tobacco manufacturers are to reduce nicotine in tobacco; Australia to ban liquid nicotine imports in 2023; Canada and New Zealand have announced the intention to start a strong stop smoking campaigns. (For me, personally, I did an intuitive test that confirms the presence of venom as a part of the whole enchilada.)
I go back to your quotation attributed to Sherman: "... we know now that to learn what is likely true, we must notice what information is expertly sabotaged." Deliberately or unconsciously, one of the most expertly sabotaged 'possible' explanation, at least in part to the covid 'virus' and spread, was the snake venom.
And I would add to that: look to where the MSM is telling you to go or do, and likely the opposite is the healthy choice.
The data on venom as bio-weapon is part of the congressional record, 1975 I think, and so isn't an 'out there' conspiracy theory.
Among many things in it you will see the CIA's development of a 'heart attack' gun that shoots an ice pellet dart that melts. The liquid contains enough venom to create a heart attack and leaves just a small red dot as a trace in the body. In an odd synchronicity I learned that in 2017 a CIA European news operative died of a heart attack a few months after his exposé of the role of the CIA in news manipulation.
Also in the film, venom producing organels that look to be present in some vials of injection as well as in the blood of people. Organels come from venom producing animals and continue to produce venom outside of the animal. Fascinating stuff.
Dr. Ardis (chiropractor with an open mind and a keen curiosity to solve puzzles) describes, anecdotally, how his wife after a few months of long covid was 'cured' within an hour after chewing nicorette gum; and that doctors who had watched their blood oxygen levels stay flat at 92 for several months saw it quickly rise within a few hours to 100 after taking the nicotine gum at Ardis's suggestion. Fascinating stuff!
Well, seeing I learned I have a blood clotting disorder that almost killed me via a DVT at 21, you might say I’m highly motivated to listen, learn and apply information.
Also worth mentioning is the wisdom of nasal rinsing with saline mixed with a little povidone iodine and the FLCCC recommendation of gargling with Scope. Anything to reduce your potential viral load after returning home makes sense. And, of course, a hot shower, too.
Just learned tonight Povidone iodine apparently was formulated in the 50s with a plastic bond so that’s why you’re not to swallow it. I don’t gargle with it but have dipped a q-tip into a few drops in my hand and gently used that to create a barrier not too deep in my nose. I’ll keep doing this. (It’s said Xlear, a spray made out of purified water, Xylitol and Grapefruit extract also makes the nasal passages inhospitable to the virus as well.)
Dr. Bryan Ardis claims Nascent Iodine is not only good for your thyroid but also fights viruses. I get mine from Global Healing and put 3 drops on my tongue, then wash it down with water. He also claims Siberian Ginseng defends against flu and RSV viruses. I also get that from the same company.
If you look up Jonathan Otto, you can sign up to get access to his free online video series covering these topics with a lot of very interesting speakers.
Ardis likely mentioned it in the 'Watch the Water' video. In April 2020 Ardis made the association following the French study that noticed the lack of smokers in the hospitals. I'll go look for it. And I'll check out Mercola, too. Thank you.
Yes. That does actually make sense to me, although I'm not a doctor either. Ardis strongly rejected the idea of smoking the nicotine. He suggested patch or gum. He is also against the vaping of nicotine. (I didn't know that was possible.)
LoL! Yes. I publicly give them credit, and with total hypocrisy categorise them as... hmmm. What kind of adjective? On my kind days, misguided or deluded. On my less kind days, brainwashed merchants of death, perhaps. I watched my ex meander the hollow halls of allopathic medicine into increased poor health after every treatment protocol.
Now you mention it, the snake venom thing was a thing. When I saw that a few months ago, the venom idea was “out there.” Wish I recalled that as linked to Peters when writing my latest post which includes the Sudden Death video. You are honest to point out the questionable material. Like Qanon, the PsyOps masters tag on slop to deflect attention away from what they want to hide. I need to make a note of this in my essay.
Karen Kingston provides the scientific explanation for the fibrous clots using the information on Moderna's own website. Her 12 part series on what is in the vaccines is exceptional work which she is equipped to do as a former employee and bio analyst at Pfizer. Dr Ana Mihalcea (on substack) also explains the scientific basis of the nano technology in the vaccines. Doctors are clueless about nano technology and are out of their depth.
This is detail. We know thrombosis is unquestionably a hallmark of the vax. How rubbery or comprehensive the clotting is, is a secondary consideration.
The problem with the whole pandemic. They purchased and administered vaccines that were not tested. They used live human subjects. Millions of them.
They said vaccines would stop the spread. Masks would stop the spread. Isolation would stop the spread.
The first two were absolute panic responses and the last one was true but caused many other serious problems not related to COVID.
So their responses in hindsight were garbage and panic. And instead of admitting some problems in their response, they started a campaign of lies and coercion.
The fight between who is right and who is wrong has now started. One side Trump and the other Biden.
Nov 27, 2022·edited Nov 27, 2022Liked by Robert Yoho MD (ret)
I saw the 15 minute excerpt of the embalmers and the weird clots they were collecting, which was posted by A Midwestern Doctor: https://vimeo.com/774931540?embedded=true&source=video_title&owner=171938047 AMD mentions that the last video in that clip was not related to covid, but outside of that, I think the 14 minutes with the embalmers is pretty strong and has a high chance of breaking through to the masses. Sometimes you need something very vivid and concrete to get through people's intellectual defenses, as stuff like VAERS can just be ignored as yet another statistic in a world where people are bombarded by them. As the shady journalists say, "if it bleeds, it leads", and it looks like this time this can be used against the MSM narrative. Josh Guetzkow also thought the embalmer section of the film was well done.
Yes I agree. There are plenty of horrors from the 'vaccines' to cover without needing to fall into exaggerations or inaccuracies. Enough for a movie that would need an intermission, that's how long it'd be.
Stew is an entertainer and as such, I have no problem with his work. To say Stew causes some problem by expressing his opinion is no different, nah worse, than the Government silencing Scientists and Doctors who want open dialog in regards to this vaccine. It is worse because you should now better Robert as should all that have been silenced.
The real Truth here is Free speech and that is not Science, it is not Truth, it is everything EXCEPT speech that inhibits another constitutional rights. Another lesson learned, I hope Robert. Shame on you.
As far as whether the Government has a depop agenda or not, that seems unlikely to be proven one way or another without a confession. No one knows why Biden shakes Klaus Schwabs hand as if he met God, Klaus being a well known Eugenics believer. Why does Canada have MAIDS? Why did Harari say the rich are building an Ark and the rest will likely drown? Why did Biden say, in one of his moments of Moron, "we could accelerate the Food Shortages"? To say there is no Depopulation Agenda defies evidence to the contrary.
My opinion, no proof either way. But again that isnt the problem, my opinion, yours, or your arrogant friends. It is so many people, including yourself, know nothing of free speech. Shame on you.
I have read your book, it added to my surprise when I read this post.
This movement is not about science. It is about freedom and the constitution. No one that matters takes Stew seriously. You and your peers want a 100 percent peer reviewed documentary, go make one.
I am not against the opinions in the post, I am against the tone that Stew should STFU. Everyone should be allowed to have free speach. That includes someone we may think is crazy, including Fauci or Joe Biden.
The issue is that he may be getting paid. With the budgets he has, he can do a better job. We all know that the First Amendment is the first for a reason.
Please show your work. If you and your friends demand documentaries must be based on facts only, at least have some proof that Stew is, what are you inferring, a CIA agent? Please. More likely to have pink elephants fly out of my ass.
I remember when Dr McCullough was on Rogans Podcast and he read peer review papers for three hours, outcome was the same. They attacked him ruthlessly.
Here is a free copy of Cassandra's Memo. I wrote about people like you who lived in Eastern Europe under the Soviets who saw it all coming around before it happened. For me, learning about it all has been agonizing. https://dl.bookfunnel.com/t2feeen29q
do you want to go on my podcast? You are of a type I admire and who I think has something important to say. yoho.robert@gmail.com
Karen Kingston and Dr Ana Mihalcea provide the scientific evidence you needed before you were so damning about the film. You are out of your depth as you know nothing about nano technology. Please see Karen Kingston's response to the film. Her 12 part series on what is in the vaccines is based on rigorous evidence which in this case is on Moderna's own website. https://karenkingston.substack.com/p/the-film-died-suddenly-lacks-scientific
I like it--"out of my depth." Yes I'm often that. The issue is when there is a battle at sea and the whole armada is sinking, do you really worry about what is happening with the flounders on the ocean floor? We have so much observational data that no true controversy exists. We are watching a genocide of our children. Does it matter whether they are getting blood clots or their throats slit?
Stew's material is generally correct and it is presented in a professional, dramatic way. That's all good. But he has set up holes for the opposition to discredit him. I can't help but think this was purposeful; he has the budget to do it right.
Hi, I'm a biologist, a few months short of a doctorate in ecology...just wanted to make a comment regarding "snake venom"...an Italian paper was just published supposedly identifying 36 'conotoxins' in the blood and fecal matter of covid patients; these are synthetic 'venoms' and there are TONS of them being used in various 'medicines', so don't blow it off as fake news before doing some research on the subject. I can't upload the paper, but here's a link: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.54306.1
And yes, I agree, that Stew Peters is all about sensationalism, but those fibrous clots are not fake and are not just "blood" clots. Dr Ana Mihalcea thinks they are caused by the nanoparticles and hydogels, not the spike proteins (amyloid placques). I suggest looking up Walter Chesnut and Jessica Rose on Substack, too. Keep up the work!!!
You are angry. I get it. But I am more angry about COVID/genocide/Marxist cultural degeneration and much more. My point about Stu is clear and I can't believe his inaccuracies are unintended. Mistakes like these do not slip through on sophisticated platforms. All that said, if people can watch stew and not get gaslit by the nonsense, maybe he is doing some good.
🎯
Unfortunately the charlatans show up to capitalize on the drama for personal gain. This is what this hack Stu is doing. He found a nitch to make some coin on the back of a human disaster. Typical pond scum.
You beat me to it. Just read her excellent critique. Karen Kingston gives credit to Stew for at least doing something to put this horror out there. She knows the truth of what has been exposed now to more than 10M views. Perhaps a follow up to "Died Suddenly" with the scientific proof, provided in your link, to show exactly why there are biostructures growing in human bodies will be coming soon.
Maybe this explains it but from an amateur perspective, seems like the same drama could have been generated with pure facts. Your point is well taken tho. Maybe he's helping.
"Died Suddenly" is a limited hangout that failed. There was too much attention brought to the subject, and people are a lot more skeptical than they were two years ago.
Skepticism is our armor. As this has developed, Died Suddenly has done a lot of good and justifiably freaked out many people. Whether it was designed to fail or not, it seems to be a net positive now. Although my critics do not seem to understand my arguments, they are nevertheless being proven right!
Really? I thought we were better than this. The progressives have insulted us by saying we are country bumpkins if we think horse paste is going to cure us and we sit here taking pot shots at people who are working at sharing what they believe to be facts. Isn’t open dialogue what we need? Stew Peters knows how to promote discussions. So does Joe Rogan. The difference is Stew Peters took it a step further with his groundbreaking video Died Suddenly. No, there are no list of research reference materials offered at the end of the video, but I for one appreciate anyone who takes the risks necessary to counter the government propaganda and censorship problem plaguing our country.
That was my original reaction but on reflection the flaws are stupid and didn't have to be in there. Seem purposeful. Stew has plenty of time and money to avoid attacks by ensuring accuracy and avoiding those conspiracy theory images.
He had time to reflect and edit... as well as a staff who has time to reflect and edit. These weren't mistakes made on the fly. And including images of UFOs and big foot can't be chalked up to a "mistake". Those were very deliberately chosen.
You have ir
Drama is part of Stew Peter’s style. It stimulates interest. The CDC used Zombie Apocalypse to promote emergency preparedness. Their program was a huge success. People will watch Died Suddenly who will never read a peer reviewed research paper on anything, but may be motivated to ask their health care provider questions that could result in saving their life. Hopefully the health care provider is also reading Substack since journals are also being censored.
I recall that CDC zombie-themed publicity stunt.
Are you saying the clotting material, that rubbery stuff, is all a fraud?
I'm not sure what you are saying; you need to rewrite this piece.
I have no background in after life care, but there is no reason to believe that the many reports of unusual clots found during the embalming process are phony. There are also doctors who have interviewed embalmers reporting the clots. Embalmers are licensed professionals who would know when they see something odd.
He's saying the film included a few critical mistakes (including footage of someone collapse prior to the Vax rollout) mixed in with valid material. This is a classic tactic used by military intelligence to discredit resistance movements. Much of the film is fine but the mainstream will focus on the blatant falsehoods and anyone on the fence will lump everyone together into the "tinfoil hat" category. The footage of UFOs and Bigfoot (completely unnecessary and odd) is also a tactic which visually links the covid resistance movement to any and all conspiracies from the legitimate to the weird and wild. We will see more of this... The "powers that be" have been crafting the public image of "conspiracy nuts" since the dawn of time and it's going to intensify. It would behoove everyone to read up on psychological warfare tactics. We must be committed to truth with no lumpy gravy mixed in to muddy things.
exactly
not a fraud. I rewrote a few sentences for you but it seems clear
I agree I don’t like all this concern about hyperbole and drama. If our government recommended and in some cases mandated a dangerous, toxic injection as all parties seem to agree, isn’t that dramatic? Why would you say ‘The government is pushing poison on us.’ And then scold someone for being dramatic about it? It’s the tamping down on the drama that makes me wonder if the message is true? What’s going on?
It's controlled opposition and sadly he must be getting paid. I was suspicious of him during our podcast.
Re the 'snake venom' bullshit theory: I suggest that we rethink it because: "... we know now that to learn what is likely true, we must notice what information is expertly sabotaged." Snake venom was brilliantly sabotaged.
I don't believe it explains everything, as the actual bioweapon attack is multi-pronged and multi-faceted. Here is a short summary of why I don't dismiss that *possibility* that snake (or animal) venom in some form is a part of the mix of this bio-battlefield part of the war.
Snake Venom Stew Peters and Brian Ardis:
I have come to think that snake venom is a part of the roll out, a part of the plan. The manner of the spread of the infection along administrative boundaries delineated by Dr. Yeadon (and others) supports that. The CIA used snake venom to test it as an invisible pathogen in the 1970s on the FBI building. It remained an undetected pathogen administered via their water system in a secure building filled with envenomated sick FBI employees. The CIA, in a congressional hearing on public record, revealed in detail how to deploy it in water systems, accommodating for chlorine, which neutralises it. It is also very easily aerosolised. The disadvantage of that method is that illness is not reliably predictable, a condition not required to create a plandemic of sickness that is mostly fictitious. (Hydroxychloroquine contains chlorine; and advocates of chlorine dioxide as a cure suggest that both may be effective in part, at least, because they may be neutralising the presence of venom, when it exists. Pierre Kory describes how different patients have different symptoms and require different treatment plans. This suggest that the various injections and or methods of infection may contain different dosages, of differing strengths, differing quality controls, and different ingredients from placebo, to contaminants, to even snake venom. )
In an interesting bit of science, it turns out that venom is used to cleave genes and there are venom peptides in the spike protein and/or other elements of the mystery soup that makes up the injections.
Snake (and animal) venom peptides attach to the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Nicotine and ivermectin are the best antidotes to this because both displace the venom peptides. The venom peptides that attach to the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors depress the breathing mechanism and slow the heart, mimicking respiratory illness. So, for this reason the respiratory response was incorrect. If covid was respiratory then smokers would be at high risk, and yet were only about 5% in a French study in early 2020. When this was pointed to the health officials, the following week the msn broadcast the importance of smokers to stop smoking immediately because they were 95% of the deaths. A total lie. Biden has signed law that tobacco manufacturers are to reduce nicotine in tobacco; Australia to ban liquid nicotine imports in 2023; Canada and New Zealand have announced the intention to start a strong stop smoking campaigns. (For me, personally, I did an intuitive test that confirms the presence of venom as a part of the whole enchilada.)
I go back to your quotation attributed to Sherman: "... we know now that to learn what is likely true, we must notice what information is expertly sabotaged." Deliberately or unconsciously, one of the most expertly sabotaged 'possible' explanation, at least in part to the covid 'virus' and spread, was the snake venom.
And I would add to that: look to where the MSM is telling you to go or do, and likely the opposite is the healthy choice.
Obviously this could go either way.
The story is so dark that we need no exotic theories like snake venom to know its evil.
You may find this film interesting to watch:
https://covenomseries.com/
The data on venom as bio-weapon is part of the congressional record, 1975 I think, and so isn't an 'out there' conspiracy theory.
Among many things in it you will see the CIA's development of a 'heart attack' gun that shoots an ice pellet dart that melts. The liquid contains enough venom to create a heart attack and leaves just a small red dot as a trace in the body. In an odd synchronicity I learned that in 2017 a CIA European news operative died of a heart attack a few months after his exposé of the role of the CIA in news manipulation.
https://rumble.com/v1slvmg-debut-cut-enjoy-the-show.html
Dr Uldo Ulfkotte exposed CIA in news/media in his 2016 book *Journalists for Hire: How the CIA Buys the News*. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/28331897-journalists-for-hire
He died of a heart attack Jan 2017
https://greatmountainpublishing.com/2022/03/16/whistle-blower-dies-after-publishing-book-about-cia-that-is-now-unavailable/
Also in the film, venom producing organels that look to be present in some vials of injection as well as in the blood of people. Organels come from venom producing animals and continue to produce venom outside of the animal. Fascinating stuff.
And that’s why I use IVM prophylactically and chew a 2 mg piece of nicotine gum before I head out somewhere.
Yes! Thank you for posting, Bridget.
Dr. Ardis (chiropractor with an open mind and a keen curiosity to solve puzzles) describes, anecdotally, how his wife after a few months of long covid was 'cured' within an hour after chewing nicorette gum; and that doctors who had watched their blood oxygen levels stay flat at 92 for several months saw it quickly rise within a few hours to 100 after taking the nicotine gum at Ardis's suggestion. Fascinating stuff!
Well, seeing I learned I have a blood clotting disorder that almost killed me via a DVT at 21, you might say I’m highly motivated to listen, learn and apply information.
Also worth mentioning is the wisdom of nasal rinsing with saline mixed with a little povidone iodine and the FLCCC recommendation of gargling with Scope. Anything to reduce your potential viral load after returning home makes sense. And, of course, a hot shower, too.
Bridget- this is very useful information! Thanks for posting!
Just learned tonight Povidone iodine apparently was formulated in the 50s with a plastic bond so that’s why you’re not to swallow it. I don’t gargle with it but have dipped a q-tip into a few drops in my hand and gently used that to create a barrier not too deep in my nose. I’ll keep doing this. (It’s said Xlear, a spray made out of purified water, Xylitol and Grapefruit extract also makes the nasal passages inhospitable to the virus as well.)
Dr. Bryan Ardis claims Nascent Iodine is not only good for your thyroid but also fights viruses. I get mine from Global Healing and put 3 drops on my tongue, then wash it down with water. He also claims Siberian Ginseng defends against flu and RSV viruses. I also get that from the same company.
If you look up Jonathan Otto, you can sign up to get access to his free online video series covering these topics with a lot of very interesting speakers.
Ardis likely mentioned it in the 'Watch the Water' video. In April 2020 Ardis made the association following the French study that noticed the lack of smokers in the hospitals. I'll go look for it. And I'll check out Mercola, too. Thank you.
Yes. That does actually make sense to me, although I'm not a doctor either. Ardis strongly rejected the idea of smoking the nicotine. He suggested patch or gum. He is also against the vaping of nicotine. (I didn't know that was possible.)
You two give doctors too much credit. No need for disclaimers.
LoL! Yes. I publicly give them credit, and with total hypocrisy categorise them as... hmmm. What kind of adjective? On my kind days, misguided or deluded. On my less kind days, brainwashed merchants of death, perhaps. I watched my ex meander the hollow halls of allopathic medicine into increased poor health after every treatment protocol.
Excellent post ...I stopped watching Stew Peters bc something about him doesn't seem authentic. Now... tell me what you think of Dr. Ana... https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/thoughts-and-comments-about-died?r=p12mg&utm_medium=android
My thought: this is beyond me. You don't have to explore the weeds; concentrate on the basics.
I am a popularizer and a synthesizer.
make your own judgments
I made the mistake of trusting Kirsch. He's wonderful but not a final authority.
I agree with what you say. Kirsch plays a vital role because of his funding But I just came across this which was retweeted by Dr. Kory. It's quite informative. https://open.substack.com/pub/amidwesterndoctor/p/what-is-causing-the-died-suddenly?utm_source=direct&r=p12mg&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Now you mention it, the snake venom thing was a thing. When I saw that a few months ago, the venom idea was “out there.” Wish I recalled that as linked to Peters when writing my latest post which includes the Sudden Death video. You are honest to point out the questionable material. Like Qanon, the PsyOps masters tag on slop to deflect attention away from what they want to hide. I need to make a note of this in my essay.
Bourbon, perhaps, making people lazy?
Karen Kingston provides the scientific explanation for the fibrous clots using the information on Moderna's own website. Her 12 part series on what is in the vaccines is exceptional work which she is equipped to do as a former employee and bio analyst at Pfizer. Dr Ana Mihalcea (on substack) also explains the scientific basis of the nano technology in the vaccines. Doctors are clueless about nano technology and are out of their depth.
https://karenkingston.substack.com/p/the-film-died-suddenly-lacks-scientific
https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/thoughts-and-comments-about-died?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=956088&post_id=86818865&isFreemail=true&utm_medium=email
This is detail. We know thrombosis is unquestionably a hallmark of the vax. How rubbery or comprehensive the clotting is, is a secondary consideration.
The problem with the whole pandemic. They purchased and administered vaccines that were not tested. They used live human subjects. Millions of them.
They said vaccines would stop the spread. Masks would stop the spread. Isolation would stop the spread.
The first two were absolute panic responses and the last one was true but caused many other serious problems not related to COVID.
So their responses in hindsight were garbage and panic. And instead of admitting some problems in their response, they started a campaign of lies and coercion.
The fight between who is right and who is wrong has now started. One side Trump and the other Biden.
The truth will never get out.
Truth is out. It was all planned by psychopaths. Free download of my book: https://dl.bookfunnel.com/t2feeen29q
Read the Breggin's unraveling of Malone at Breggin.com
I saw the 15 minute excerpt of the embalmers and the weird clots they were collecting, which was posted by A Midwestern Doctor: https://vimeo.com/774931540?embedded=true&source=video_title&owner=171938047 AMD mentions that the last video in that clip was not related to covid, but outside of that, I think the 14 minutes with the embalmers is pretty strong and has a high chance of breaking through to the masses. Sometimes you need something very vivid and concrete to get through people's intellectual defenses, as stuff like VAERS can just be ignored as yet another statistic in a world where people are bombarded by them. As the shady journalists say, "if it bleeds, it leads", and it looks like this time this can be used against the MSM narrative. Josh Guetzkow also thought the embalmer section of the film was well done.
All true but the errors are fatal. Peters knows of the flaws
Stew could have done this with no breach of facts.
Yes I agree. There are plenty of horrors from the 'vaccines' to cover without needing to fall into exaggerations or inaccuracies. Enough for a movie that would need an intermission, that's how long it'd be.
Stew is an entertainer and as such, I have no problem with his work. To say Stew causes some problem by expressing his opinion is no different, nah worse, than the Government silencing Scientists and Doctors who want open dialog in regards to this vaccine. It is worse because you should now better Robert as should all that have been silenced.
The real Truth here is Free speech and that is not Science, it is not Truth, it is everything EXCEPT speech that inhibits another constitutional rights. Another lesson learned, I hope Robert. Shame on you.
As far as whether the Government has a depop agenda or not, that seems unlikely to be proven one way or another without a confession. No one knows why Biden shakes Klaus Schwabs hand as if he met God, Klaus being a well known Eugenics believer. Why does Canada have MAIDS? Why did Harari say the rich are building an Ark and the rest will likely drown? Why did Biden say, in one of his moments of Moron, "we could accelerate the Food Shortages"? To say there is no Depopulation Agenda defies evidence to the contrary.
My opinion, no proof either way. But again that isnt the problem, my opinion, yours, or your arrogant friends. It is so many people, including yourself, know nothing of free speech. Shame on you.
https://dl.bookfunnel.com/t2feeen29q
Read my book and you may decide my ideas are both darker and more nuanced than you give me credit for here. Free download above.
I have read your book, it added to my surprise when I read this post.
This movement is not about science. It is about freedom and the constitution. No one that matters takes Stew seriously. You and your peers want a 100 percent peer reviewed documentary, go make one.
I am not against the opinions in the post, I am against the tone that Stew should STFU. Everyone should be allowed to have free speach. That includes someone we may think is crazy, including Fauci or Joe Biden.
The issue is that he may be getting paid. With the budgets he has, he can do a better job. We all know that the First Amendment is the first for a reason.
Please show your work. If you and your friends demand documentaries must be based on facts only, at least have some proof that Stew is, what are you inferring, a CIA agent? Please. More likely to have pink elephants fly out of my ass.
I remember when Dr McCullough was on Rogans Podcast and he read peer review papers for three hours, outcome was the same. They attacked him ruthlessly.
The con was done cleverly. Many of us fell for it.
This is the old, "Additional Evidence Required" gaslighting technique.
yes and great comment!! The Breggin opinion is that Malone is a bad actor. https://breggin.com/article-detail/post_detail/The-Desmet-Malone-Ideology-of-Mass-Psychosis-Blames-the-Citizens-and-Not-the-Global-Predators
Here is a free copy of Cassandra's Memo. I wrote about people like you who lived in Eastern Europe under the Soviets who saw it all coming around before it happened. For me, learning about it all has been agonizing. https://dl.bookfunnel.com/t2feeen29q
do you want to go on my podcast? You are of a type I admire and who I think has something important to say. yoho.robert@gmail.com
Karen Kingston and Dr Ana Mihalcea provide the scientific evidence you needed before you were so damning about the film. You are out of your depth as you know nothing about nano technology. Please see Karen Kingston's response to the film. Her 12 part series on what is in the vaccines is based on rigorous evidence which in this case is on Moderna's own website. https://karenkingston.substack.com/p/the-film-died-suddenly-lacks-scientific
I like it--"out of my depth." Yes I'm often that. The issue is when there is a battle at sea and the whole armada is sinking, do you really worry about what is happening with the flounders on the ocean floor? We have so much observational data that no true controversy exists. We are watching a genocide of our children. Does it matter whether they are getting blood clots or their throats slit?
Stew's material is generally correct and it is presented in a professional, dramatic way. That's all good. But he has set up holes for the opposition to discredit him. I can't help but think this was purposeful; he has the budget to do it right.
Hi, I'm a biologist, a few months short of a doctorate in ecology...just wanted to make a comment regarding "snake venom"...an Italian paper was just published supposedly identifying 36 'conotoxins' in the blood and fecal matter of covid patients; these are synthetic 'venoms' and there are TONS of them being used in various 'medicines', so don't blow it off as fake news before doing some research on the subject. I can't upload the paper, but here's a link: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.54306.1
And yes, I agree, that Stew Peters is all about sensationalism, but those fibrous clots are not fake and are not just "blood" clots. Dr Ana Mihalcea thinks they are caused by the nanoparticles and hydogels, not the spike proteins (amyloid placques). I suggest looking up Walter Chesnut and Jessica Rose on Substack, too. Keep up the work!!!
Morticians have been outing the weird rubbery clots for about 24 months. If you don't know this is a thing your are tying to breath underwater.