58 Comments

Hi Robert! I went through the rest of Craig's channel after I posted the article last week.

They other key points their analysts were able to make were:

•If you look at the lots on the basis of what % of their responses were severe (which does not require you to know how many lots there we to start with), then the lots that are "hot by their total number of deaths reported are also "hot lots" by this metric. This strengthens the case for the association.

•The distribution of hot lots is only seen with the COVID-19 vaccines; it was not seen with flu shots.

•It was possible to know the lot sizes of the initial 30 lots; and since this is known, clearly proves the hot lots are "hot."

•There appeared to be serious quality control/manufacturing issues, and when the initial vaccines were produced, the EMA had stated they were not made under "good manufacturing processes" but due to the emergency situation, those lots that were not GMP compliant were released on the market.

•There is quite a bit of evidence to suggest that the vaccines become less toxic over time as they degrade, and the places that got the vaccines the soonest (you see this the most clearly with belgium compared to the rest of Europe as the plant that made them was in the country) had a higher rate of adverse reactions. Similarly, the sweedish data set you have shows that the more recently after production time the vaccines are administred, the higher an adverse event rate they have.

•Overall the best fit explanation for all of this is that there was not time to develop the technology before it came to market, so they are doing a dose control study, and the "hot lots" are the higher mRNA doses they needed to test for that study.

•There is also some evidence they have experimented with developing a form of mRNA that takes longer to degrade in the body, as certain areas that received these lots have far more delayed deaths.

•The most distrubing thing they found was that a few heavily republican states disproportionately received the hot lots.

Expand full comment
Sep 10, 2022Liked by Robert Yoho MD (ret)

“The most distrubing thing they found was that a few heavily republican states disproportionately received the hot lots.”

Truly disturbing.

Expand full comment

I actually noticed a difference in the anecdotal numbers of deaths and injuries between two neighboring "red" and "blue" towns in Oregon.

The Republicans fared far worse. Coincidence? Somehow I do not think so. Diabolical if true? Absolutely.

Remember, dividing us, one from another, is more important than any other action these psychopaths take. Because if the People ever come together they are FINISHED!

And currently of course the blue tribe are still in trance. Not so much the red.

Expand full comment

Is there a way to find out how many injections from every lot were given?

Also, given what is established to be vast under reporting of significant adverse effects to VAERS, could these lot trends be potentially undermined by full reporting, i.e. could other lots potentially even worse than lots in the top spots now?

Anecdotally, I had a significant AE immediately after receiving two vaccines years ago—prior to the Covid Era. The pharmacist told me he reported the effects to the CDC, but also said, “What they do with it (the report) is anybody’s guess.” I never heard another thing. I live with ongoing ill effects.

Expand full comment

Please see my comment to this post, interested in your thoughts as well.

Expand full comment

If you considered it important enough to view the videos, I had to take a look for myself.

I would add one more point to your synopsis, in below video he shows they found rate of injury to females was 2-3X that in males:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/xbtNAMlczhDM/

Expand full comment

Women are almost always injured more by toxins than males. It's our biology.

And another reason the "guys" tend to misdiagnosis women. They just don't comprehend that more delicate nervous system and it's susceptibility to EMF, neurotoxins, heavy metals, plus the differences in liver, cardiovascular systems, etc. There is a reason most with "chemical sensitivity" are female,

and it's not "psychological!"

Expand full comment

That is true, but that doesn't relate to the hot lot point. The challenge I always run into is keeping things from being too long, and if you allow yourself to disperse into tangents that don't tie back to the main theme, then you always loose your audience. That is going to go into the next installment in the series I wrote about vaccines being used for population control for decades.

Expand full comment
Sep 10, 2022Liked by Robert Yoho MD (ret)

It’s very obvious that “they” intended deadly lethal harm…but not to an extremely high amount of the population of each state or country to begin with…..as that would have definitely tipped the public off! Also they intended many to die but a vast majority to be disabled and have a short life span! And another group to experience harm and death after several months….or maybe years…and a large number to experience no harm….red states to get the most harm… and blue states less harm! The harm has been staggered from immediate..to….within a couple weeks …to a few months…to a few years! They had this down to a well planned systematic destruction of society…specific to certain areas…hoping to hoodwink the vast majority of the population! This was obviously cleverly planned years ago! To a totally unsuspecting populous! Secret Societies…do things with the utmost secrecy!

Expand full comment
author

These people are psychopaths. They want to harm. It’s irrational by our standards.

Expand full comment
author

Here’s another post about psychopaths. Draft. https://robertyoho.substack.com/p/9e861054-b7f2-453d-8f22-0a10c7b6d2e6

Expand full comment

Thanks for the emphasis on psychopaths. It has been a major interest of mine since this massive alliance of corruption got started. It is my observation that Big Tech/Social Media, the imposed isolation, the manufacturing of fear-based promotion of vaccines, medical tyranny, etc select for narcissistic personality disorder.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment

It seems no matter how deeply we dive into our history we encounter these enemies to freedom. Yes, they are always enemies of free peoples but must be quickly identified and disarmed to be rendered impotent. Now, if information such as the following are true, we have an even larger problem.

Expand full comment

They’re not only psychopaths… but their eugenists (murderers)…with no conscience….just like this movement was before and during WW11…..their a criminal cobal… that has existed for centuries……and has grown by leaps and bounds as the standard of culture and societies have disnigrated!

Expand full comment
Sep 10, 2022Liked by Robert Yoho MD (ret)

This is brilliantly exposing the holocaust! Thank you so much! I hope to share this with some of my relatives and friends. You can't deny what has transpired unless you are intentionally lying to yourself.

Expand full comment
author

This is the summary version. For all the nuance see A midwestern doctor’s posts.

Expand full comment
Sep 10, 2022Liked by Robert Yoho MD (ret)

You might also want to take a look at South Korea. Their Public Health authorities commented noted the huge drop in adverse events this year. In particular, it looks like Moderna made a major change in the last month of last year.

https://twitter.com/the_rostrich/status/1564893925600505856

Source: https://ncv.kdca.go.kr/board.es?mid=a11707010000&bid=0032&act=view&list_no=818&tag=&nPage=1

Download the PDF attachment there and look at page 4 (you can run the document through Google Translate to help read it). Unless they decided to lie about adverse events, it really seems like something changed.

Expand full comment
Sep 10, 2022Liked by Robert Yoho MD (ret)

I know it’s not a point of contention; but considering their history of destroying the placebo group, I don’t believe they deployed saline in any of their lots. Varied amounts for dosage studies I can believe; but after all, it’s kind of their forte.

Expand full comment
author

I’ve resd analysis showing 15 percent placebo but don’t have the ref

Expand full comment

If a silver lining even exists, I’ll never need to worry about trusting them again.

Expand full comment

Peter McCullough has also quoted that 15% figure, but I cannot find a source. Would love to have it.

Expand full comment

I assume an individual could have been fortunate enough to have their first jab come from a possible saline batch; no harm, no foul. However I assume the second jab and any others all come from different batches, so while the first might have been safe, odds are slim any of the other batches we equally safe.

Expand full comment
author

It’s like having major surgical risks again and again but these escalate every time.

Expand full comment

Yes, but perhaps saline batches were given to specific populations that tend to support certain agendas.

Expand full comment

Robert, you do excellent research, and put in long hours doing so.

Less than 2 minutes of research turns up what Every Parent should know, and be screaming at their Congresscritters over. TOXIC HEAVY METAL IN BABY FOOD/FORMULA https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FioAyq_BafSc%2Fmaxresdefault.jpg&f=1&nofb=1

As RFK Jr says AUTISM and DEMENTIA. You are feeding your children Poison from birth to death. Along with the Killer Vaccines.

This is not well understood, but IT'S MY MONEY. NOT BIDEN's. PLEASE BETTER EXPLANATION

US Treasury to Recommend Issuing Digital Dollar if in National Interest: Source

WHO SAYS IT'S IN NATIONAL INTEREST, IT'S IN BIDEN's AND BIG MANUFACTURING, BANKING INTEREST SO THEY CAN TRACK EVERYTHING YOU BUY, 666 CHIP IN HAND NEXT!

That much is simple to understand.

The Treasury Department, in what may be its most important recommendation spurred by President Joe Biden’s executive order on crypto, will suggest how to move forward on a CBDC.

https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2022/09/08/us-treasury-to-recommend-issuing-digital-dollar-if-in-national-interest-source/

I HATE SELF CHECKOUTS, IT IS INCLUDED IN THE COST OF FOOD, IF I HAVE TO SHOP, CHECK OUT, BAG MY FOOD, I DESERVE CHEAPER PRICES. That cashier needs the job, as does the bagger. A CUSTOMER has demanded years of wages from a grocery chain after arguing that using self-checkout practically makes you identical to the cashier.

https://share.newsbreak.com/1qwnkegz

Expand full comment
Sep 10, 2022Liked by Robert Yoho MD (ret)

The amount of raw defensiveness based on massive mis/disinformation fed by fear-based slick advertising and mass media is sickening. It is indicative of some mass-formation something and it is not a positive step in human psychology. It is the culmination of a science, a culture, and civilizations gone bonkers. Support human interdependence, not globalist-inspired divide & conquer policies. We know who is doing all this. Rise up and stop them.

Expand full comment
author

The last sentence is definitive. The rest isn’t.

Expand full comment

Thank you, Robert, for shining a light on this topic.

Expand full comment
author

My job is to simplify and clarify. My feeling is that splitting more hairs is unneeded. We have monstrous crimes and understand the unnatural motivations.

I appreciate your positive feedback; sometimes it seems like we are all casting around in the dark.

Expand full comment

Dr. Yoho---this is a process, and you are helping to shine light on the demons who are perpetrating these crimes. People are waking up and fighting back. Remember--one candle . . . God bless you.

Expand full comment

Except for the creators of the virus and the shots.

Expand full comment

Thank you so much for all of your efforts to research and disseminate this information to help us. How can I ever forget that Pfizer numbered its lots for toxicity? I am sending this information to others. To reiterate, a huge thanks.

Expand full comment
author

Then they studied the kill rate.

Expand full comment

How, exactly, do they study the kill rate? Are they relying on VAERS, the same way we are? I have read there is supposed to be a protocol whereby every single handler along the supply chain of every vial, from manufacturer, to person putting vial in freezer, to person who transports, to person who dilutes, to person who injects, is recorded on the vial. Pfizer refused to comply. No way to trace variables introduced along the way.

Expand full comment

I am not a constant researcher on the topic of hot lots; in addition, I have to admit, I skim a lot.

Given that caveat, here are two other sources that I know of that conflict with the idea that, in general, hot lots from Moderna came first in 2021, then Pfizer (i.e. working in concert together).

https://jasonmorphett.substack.com/p/identifying-if-pfizer-had-bad-batches

https://www.bitchute.com/video/aW8pZWELmjlO/

My take has been that both companies had hot lots roughly during the first half of 2021 to test out the dosage size (and possibly other mix of ingredients such as saRNA) and then refined by mid 2021 which is described here:

https://leemuller.substack.com/p/did-phase-i-of-clinical-trials-which

I am very open to being corrected, and would welcome if I am wrong. Any feedback is appreciated.

Expand full comment

Thank you for these references; I had not seen them before. I am going to need to ponder this for a few days.

Expand full comment

I edited the post I wrote a bit, so you may want to check it for some of the details you are quoting.

Expand full comment

Top shelf!

Expand full comment

Once you release a hot batch you would see pretty quickly NOT to release more of it. We need to see if they kept releasing the hot batches. And to whom. If they had info those beaches were killing people and they kept doing it then every death is first degree murder against everyone in the know. They could plausibly argue ‘we didn’t know people would die’, at first. I don’t believe that but there is plausible deniability. No plausible deniability can be there once they see the effect of the hot batches should they keep releasing it.

Expand full comment
author

you should never give psychopaths the benefit of doubt, they are not like us. their objective is to maim and kill. see https://robertyoho.substack.com/p/149-testing-for-psychopathsthe-stuff#details

Expand full comment

I’m not actually. But this is one way to turn this into murder trials. The hot batch idea.

Expand full comment
author

We are not short of evidence. Hopeful developments are happening in the courts. The Pfizer data dump is being used by plaintiffs and CHD has forced discovery on Fauci.

Expand full comment

https://www.bitchute.com/video/o3P51JT8ZXZa/

self-assembling nano-circuits in the vaxes

Expand full comment

This is interesting in light of all the reports coming in from around the planet independently confirming the existence of these Graphene Oxide self-assembling circuits found in the vaccines.

Expand full comment

Can't watch the video at the beginning. 'This video has been removed for violating YouTube's Terms of Service'

Expand full comment