Hi Robert! I went through the rest of Craig's channel after I posted the article last week.
They other key points their analysts were able to make were:
•If you look at the lots on the basis of what % of their responses were severe (which does not require you to know how many lots there we to start with), then the lots that are "hot by their total number of deaths reported are also "hot lots" by this metric. This strengthens the case for the association.
•The distribution of hot lots is only seen with the COVID-19 vaccines; it was not seen with flu shots.
•It was possible to know the lot sizes of the initial 30 lots; and since this is known, clearly proves the hot lots are "hot."
•There appeared to be serious quality control/manufacturing issues, and when the initial vaccines were produced, the EMA had stated they were not made under "good manufacturing processes" but due to the emergency situation, those lots that were not GMP compliant were released on the market.
•There is quite a bit of evidence to suggest that the vaccines become less toxic over time as they degrade, and the places that got the vaccines the soonest (you see this the most clearly with belgium compared to the rest of Europe as the plant that made them was in the country) had a higher rate of adverse reactions. Similarly, the sweedish data set you have shows that the more recently after production time the vaccines are administred, the higher an adverse event rate they have.
•Overall the best fit explanation for all of this is that there was not time to develop the technology before it came to market, so they are doing a dose control study, and the "hot lots" are the higher mRNA doses they needed to test for that study.
•There is also some evidence they have experimented with developing a form of mRNA that takes longer to degrade in the body, as certain areas that received these lots have far more delayed deaths.
•The most distrubing thing they found was that a few heavily republican states disproportionately received the hot lots.
When will this stop, now that so many are coming forward with overwhelming evidence that these bioweapon injections were intentionally distributed knowing full well that people were going to be harmed?
It’s very obvious that “they” intended deadly lethal harm…but not to an extremely high amount of the population of each state or country to begin with…..as that would have definitely tipped the public off! Also they intended many to die but a vast majority to be disabled and have a short life span! And another group to experience harm and death after several months….or maybe years…and a large number to experience no harm….red states to get the most harm… and blue states less harm! The harm has been staggered from immediate..to….within a couple weeks …to a few months…to a few years! They had this down to a well planned systematic destruction of society…specific to certain areas…hoping to hoodwink the vast majority of the population! This was obviously cleverly planned years ago! To a totally unsuspecting populous! Secret Societies…do things with the utmost secrecy!
This is brilliantly exposing the holocaust! Thank you so much! I hope to share this with some of my relatives and friends. You can't deny what has transpired unless you are intentionally lying to yourself.
You might also want to take a look at South Korea. Their Public Health authorities commented noted the huge drop in adverse events this year. In particular, it looks like Moderna made a major change in the last month of last year.
Download the PDF attachment there and look at page 4 (you can run the document through Google Translate to help read it). Unless they decided to lie about adverse events, it really seems like something changed.
I know it’s not a point of contention; but considering their history of destroying the placebo group, I don’t believe they deployed saline in any of their lots. Varied amounts for dosage studies I can believe; but after all, it’s kind of their forte.
I assume an individual could have been fortunate enough to have their first jab come from a possible saline batch; no harm, no foul. However I assume the second jab and any others all come from different batches, so while the first might have been safe, odds are slim any of the other batches we equally safe.
As RFK Jr says AUTISM and DEMENTIA. You are feeding your children Poison from birth to death. Along with the Killer Vaccines.
This is not well understood, but IT'S MY MONEY. NOT BIDEN's. PLEASE BETTER EXPLANATION
US Treasury to Recommend Issuing Digital Dollar if in National Interest: Source
WHO SAYS IT'S IN NATIONAL INTEREST, IT'S IN BIDEN's AND BIG MANUFACTURING, BANKING INTEREST SO THEY CAN TRACK EVERYTHING YOU BUY, 666 CHIP IN HAND NEXT!
That much is simple to understand.
The Treasury Department, in what may be its most important recommendation spurred by President Joe Biden’s executive order on crypto, will suggest how to move forward on a CBDC.
I HATE SELF CHECKOUTS, IT IS INCLUDED IN THE COST OF FOOD, IF I HAVE TO SHOP, CHECK OUT, BAG MY FOOD, I DESERVE CHEAPER PRICES. That cashier needs the job, as does the bagger. A CUSTOMER has demanded years of wages from a grocery chain after arguing that using self-checkout practically makes you identical to the cashier.
The amount of raw defensiveness based on massive mis/disinformation fed by fear-based slick advertising and mass media is sickening. It is indicative of some mass-formation something and it is not a positive step in human psychology. It is the culmination of a science, a culture, and civilizations gone bonkers. Support human interdependence, not globalist-inspired divide & conquer policies. We know who is doing all this. Rise up and stop them.
Thank you so much for all of your efforts to research and disseminate this information to help us. How can I ever forget that Pfizer numbered its lots for toxicity? I am sending this information to others. To reiterate, a huge thanks.
I am not a constant researcher on the topic of hot lots; in addition, I have to admit, I skim a lot.
Given that caveat, here are two other sources that I know of that conflict with the idea that, in general, hot lots from Moderna came first in 2021, then Pfizer (i.e. working in concert together).
My take has been that both companies had hot lots roughly during the first half of 2021 to test out the dosage size (and possibly other mix of ingredients such as saRNA) and then refined by mid 2021 which is described here:
Once you release a hot batch you would see pretty quickly NOT to release more of it. We need to see if they kept releasing the hot batches. And to whom. If they had info those beaches were killing people and they kept doing it then every death is first degree murder against everyone in the know. They could plausibly argue ‘we didn’t know people would die’, at first. I don’t believe that but there is plausible deniability. No plausible deniability can be there once they see the effect of the hot batches should they keep releasing it.
Hi Robert! I went through the rest of Craig's channel after I posted the article last week.
They other key points their analysts were able to make were:
•If you look at the lots on the basis of what % of their responses were severe (which does not require you to know how many lots there we to start with), then the lots that are "hot by their total number of deaths reported are also "hot lots" by this metric. This strengthens the case for the association.
•The distribution of hot lots is only seen with the COVID-19 vaccines; it was not seen with flu shots.
•It was possible to know the lot sizes of the initial 30 lots; and since this is known, clearly proves the hot lots are "hot."
•There appeared to be serious quality control/manufacturing issues, and when the initial vaccines were produced, the EMA had stated they were not made under "good manufacturing processes" but due to the emergency situation, those lots that were not GMP compliant were released on the market.
•There is quite a bit of evidence to suggest that the vaccines become less toxic over time as they degrade, and the places that got the vaccines the soonest (you see this the most clearly with belgium compared to the rest of Europe as the plant that made them was in the country) had a higher rate of adverse reactions. Similarly, the sweedish data set you have shows that the more recently after production time the vaccines are administred, the higher an adverse event rate they have.
•Overall the best fit explanation for all of this is that there was not time to develop the technology before it came to market, so they are doing a dose control study, and the "hot lots" are the higher mRNA doses they needed to test for that study.
•There is also some evidence they have experimented with developing a form of mRNA that takes longer to degrade in the body, as certain areas that received these lots have far more delayed deaths.
•The most distrubing thing they found was that a few heavily republican states disproportionately received the hot lots.
When will this stop, now that so many are coming forward with overwhelming evidence that these bioweapon injections were intentionally distributed knowing full well that people were going to be harmed?
It’s very obvious that “they” intended deadly lethal harm…but not to an extremely high amount of the population of each state or country to begin with…..as that would have definitely tipped the public off! Also they intended many to die but a vast majority to be disabled and have a short life span! And another group to experience harm and death after several months….or maybe years…and a large number to experience no harm….red states to get the most harm… and blue states less harm! The harm has been staggered from immediate..to….within a couple weeks …to a few months…to a few years! They had this down to a well planned systematic destruction of society…specific to certain areas…hoping to hoodwink the vast majority of the population! This was obviously cleverly planned years ago! To a totally unsuspecting populous! Secret Societies…do things with the utmost secrecy!
This is brilliantly exposing the holocaust! Thank you so much! I hope to share this with some of my relatives and friends. You can't deny what has transpired unless you are intentionally lying to yourself.
You might also want to take a look at South Korea. Their Public Health authorities commented noted the huge drop in adverse events this year. In particular, it looks like Moderna made a major change in the last month of last year.
https://twitter.com/the_rostrich/status/1564893925600505856
Source: https://ncv.kdca.go.kr/board.es?mid=a11707010000&bid=0032&act=view&list_no=818&tag=&nPage=1
Download the PDF attachment there and look at page 4 (you can run the document through Google Translate to help read it). Unless they decided to lie about adverse events, it really seems like something changed.
I know it’s not a point of contention; but considering their history of destroying the placebo group, I don’t believe they deployed saline in any of their lots. Varied amounts for dosage studies I can believe; but after all, it’s kind of their forte.
I assume an individual could have been fortunate enough to have their first jab come from a possible saline batch; no harm, no foul. However I assume the second jab and any others all come from different batches, so while the first might have been safe, odds are slim any of the other batches we equally safe.
Robert, you do excellent research, and put in long hours doing so.
Less than 2 minutes of research turns up what Every Parent should know, and be screaming at their Congresscritters over. TOXIC HEAVY METAL IN BABY FOOD/FORMULA https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FioAyq_BafSc%2Fmaxresdefault.jpg&f=1&nofb=1
As RFK Jr says AUTISM and DEMENTIA. You are feeding your children Poison from birth to death. Along with the Killer Vaccines.
This is not well understood, but IT'S MY MONEY. NOT BIDEN's. PLEASE BETTER EXPLANATION
US Treasury to Recommend Issuing Digital Dollar if in National Interest: Source
WHO SAYS IT'S IN NATIONAL INTEREST, IT'S IN BIDEN's AND BIG MANUFACTURING, BANKING INTEREST SO THEY CAN TRACK EVERYTHING YOU BUY, 666 CHIP IN HAND NEXT!
That much is simple to understand.
The Treasury Department, in what may be its most important recommendation spurred by President Joe Biden’s executive order on crypto, will suggest how to move forward on a CBDC.
https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2022/09/08/us-treasury-to-recommend-issuing-digital-dollar-if-in-national-interest-source/
I HATE SELF CHECKOUTS, IT IS INCLUDED IN THE COST OF FOOD, IF I HAVE TO SHOP, CHECK OUT, BAG MY FOOD, I DESERVE CHEAPER PRICES. That cashier needs the job, as does the bagger. A CUSTOMER has demanded years of wages from a grocery chain after arguing that using self-checkout practically makes you identical to the cashier.
https://share.newsbreak.com/1qwnkegz
The amount of raw defensiveness based on massive mis/disinformation fed by fear-based slick advertising and mass media is sickening. It is indicative of some mass-formation something and it is not a positive step in human psychology. It is the culmination of a science, a culture, and civilizations gone bonkers. Support human interdependence, not globalist-inspired divide & conquer policies. We know who is doing all this. Rise up and stop them.
Thank you, Robert, for shining a light on this topic.
Thank you so much for all of your efforts to research and disseminate this information to help us. How can I ever forget that Pfizer numbered its lots for toxicity? I am sending this information to others. To reiterate, a huge thanks.
I am not a constant researcher on the topic of hot lots; in addition, I have to admit, I skim a lot.
Given that caveat, here are two other sources that I know of that conflict with the idea that, in general, hot lots from Moderna came first in 2021, then Pfizer (i.e. working in concert together).
https://jasonmorphett.substack.com/p/identifying-if-pfizer-had-bad-batches
https://www.bitchute.com/video/aW8pZWELmjlO/
My take has been that both companies had hot lots roughly during the first half of 2021 to test out the dosage size (and possibly other mix of ingredients such as saRNA) and then refined by mid 2021 which is described here:
https://leemuller.substack.com/p/did-phase-i-of-clinical-trials-which
I am very open to being corrected, and would welcome if I am wrong. Any feedback is appreciated.
I edited the post I wrote a bit, so you may want to check it for some of the details you are quoting.
Top shelf!
Once you release a hot batch you would see pretty quickly NOT to release more of it. We need to see if they kept releasing the hot batches. And to whom. If they had info those beaches were killing people and they kept doing it then every death is first degree murder against everyone in the know. They could plausibly argue ‘we didn’t know people would die’, at first. I don’t believe that but there is plausible deniability. No plausible deniability can be there once they see the effect of the hot batches should they keep releasing it.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/o3P51JT8ZXZa/
self-assembling nano-circuits in the vaxes