Thank you for this report. I shared it with one of my very intelligent sons who is still in La La Land. He told me the other day I would have to send him some scientific evidence of what I have been trying to explain to him about the globalist depopulation agenda. This should be his red pill, I'm hoping.
Thank you for all this information! So so sad to see the data, and know that my indoctrinated extended family, who are jumping for joy over the 5th double shot, may become one of those data points.
before the jabs were made available I read a long report by Seneff & Nigh about all of the research that went into the jabs. They did a very good job of referencing all of the research. Took me 3 days to digest it all, had to look up many terms. My first bit of shock was how old the research was, for some reason I was expecting it to be more current. They elucidated the possibilities of bad outcomes, many possibilities. My biggest take away from the research was that the more jabs you had, the higher the likelihood that you were going to die from it. As time has went on all of the possibilities have now shown that they are solid outcomes, no longer possibilities, but probabilities. It was intentional, designed to kill, sometimes by a thousands cuts, other times by a single injection, but always designed to kill.
I further believe that the EMFs come to play in this scenario, they work to optimize the bad outcomes. EMFs on their own are dangerous, but they play well with the jabs. I think there is so much more to all of this than many have come to realize.
Thanks for all of your work and your posts. I especially appreciate that you make no difference between paid subscribers and those that do not pay. I am on a fixed income, I try to support those that I feel can use the money for their families. I would like to support everyone, but it is just not in the finances.
!n mutual appreciation of the 2ndSmartestGuy, here is his latest post relative to the spike being found in the encephalitic lesions of a Parkinson's patient
"Surprisingly, only spike protein but no nucleocapsid protein (meaning the virus) could be detected within the foci of inflammation in both the brain and the heart, particularly in the endothelial cells of small blood vessels."
Wow! Here is the first report illustrating that the spike protein was in the encephalitic lesions of a Parkinson's patient with no history of the virus with the attendant nucleocapsid
Are jabbed individuals considered 'unvaccinated' for the immediate post-jab period, often stated as 14 days, and how does one adjust the results if this is the existing practice? I would think if this is true that the unvacc'd mortality rates would be overstated and the vacc'd rates understated.
I don't understand why 2nd and third doses of a toxic injection would result in lower mortality rates than from a single dose.
Thank you for this report. I shared it with one of my very intelligent sons who is still in La La Land. He told me the other day I would have to send him some scientific evidence of what I have been trying to explain to him about the globalist depopulation agenda. This should be his red pill, I'm hoping.
Yes, I have been following the data on deaths and births from around the world too, Here are some additional sources:
Deaths Europe: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/ddn-20220916-1
Deaths Australia: https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/causes-death/provisional-mortality-statistics/latest-release
Pfizer Adverse Events around the world Directly from Australian Governmental website https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/foi-3727-01.pdf
Taiwan Births, Deaths and Depopulation: https://www.ris.gov.tw/app/en/2120
Thank you for all this information! So so sad to see the data, and know that my indoctrinated extended family, who are jumping for joy over the 5th double shot, may become one of those data points.
before the jabs were made available I read a long report by Seneff & Nigh about all of the research that went into the jabs. They did a very good job of referencing all of the research. Took me 3 days to digest it all, had to look up many terms. My first bit of shock was how old the research was, for some reason I was expecting it to be more current. They elucidated the possibilities of bad outcomes, many possibilities. My biggest take away from the research was that the more jabs you had, the higher the likelihood that you were going to die from it. As time has went on all of the possibilities have now shown that they are solid outcomes, no longer possibilities, but probabilities. It was intentional, designed to kill, sometimes by a thousands cuts, other times by a single injection, but always designed to kill.
I further believe that the EMFs come to play in this scenario, they work to optimize the bad outcomes. EMFs on their own are dangerous, but they play well with the jabs. I think there is so much more to all of this than many have come to realize.
Thanks for all of your work and your posts. I especially appreciate that you make no difference between paid subscribers and those that do not pay. I am on a fixed income, I try to support those that I feel can use the money for their families. I would like to support everyone, but it is just not in the finances.
Excellent work as always!
I’ll share to Reddit!
Frankenstein resurrection
Thank you, Dr. Yoho
!n mutual appreciation of the 2ndSmartestGuy, here is his latest post relative to the spike being found in the encephalitic lesions of a Parkinson's patient
:https://2ndsmartestguyintheworld.substack.com/p/just-in-mrna-spike-protein-detected/comments
It was the spike!
"Surprisingly, only spike protein but no nucleocapsid protein (meaning the virus) could be detected within the foci of inflammation in both the brain and the heart, particularly in the endothelial cells of small blood vessels."
Wow! Here is the first report illustrating that the spike protein was in the encephalitic lesions of a Parkinson's patient with no history of the virus with the attendant nucleocapsid
It was the jab!
Are jabbed individuals considered 'unvaccinated' for the immediate post-jab period, often stated as 14 days, and how does one adjust the results if this is the existing practice? I would think if this is true that the unvacc'd mortality rates would be overstated and the vacc'd rates understated.
I don't understand why 2nd and third doses of a toxic injection would result in lower mortality rates than from a single dose.