Here is a study from 2018 of graphene used in experiments for vaccines. Identifying known hazards of the substance in vaccines. Just two years before implemented into the experimental jabs sold as, "safe and effective." Do you really think they solved all of the known problems with it in just two short years? Looking at the known hazards presented in this study it sure looks like they didn't. This study is a smoking gun that they knew what they were doing to us. And did it anyways. Which makes them evil, not just mistakenly hopeful.
Because of its properties graphene is able to increase the uptake of a substance into the body. It penetrates blood cells to deliver the drug inside, evade a cell's defenses. It can also be delivered directly to an organ inside the body which acts as a magnet to attract more graphene and build scaffolding there for implants to be created, allowing for novel targeted treatments. But this isn't done without risk of injury. They have been experimenting with ways to use the best properties of graphene for increased pharmaceutical uptake without inducing known injury. They try different coatings to prevent injury, but the coatings make graphene less effective, they pass through the system faster without as much uptake.
"Due to the sharp edges of GO and rGO, hemolytic effects might be expected in vivo, possibly caused by nanomaterial blades disrupting cell membranes, as reported for GO interactions with bacteria.
Feng and colleagues discovered RBC morphological alterations and aggregation above 100 mg mL1 and hemolytic effects above 10 mg mL1 reaching 96% at 500 mg mL1. Lower hemolytic concentrations have been reported by other groups. Small GO flakes (few hundreds of nm) seem to be more destructive."
"Hemostasis cascade prevents blood loss from injured tissue and maintains blood fluidity. The final hemostasis is driven by platelets, which form the clot, a mixture of red blood cells, aggregated platelets, fibrin and other cellular elements (Fig. 3-2b). If the clot forms abnormally, it can induce thrombosis.
Thrombogenicity is an important feature evaluated in nanomaterial design for in vivo delivery and represents the propensity to induce blood clotting and induce occlusion of a blood vessel by a thrombus."
"Furthermore, nanoparticles engineered to have longer systemic circulation times increase the likelihood of contact with blood components including the coagulation system, with thrombogenicity risks."
"When administered in vivo (250 mg kg1 body weight), 48% of lung vessels were partially occluded after 15 minutes"
"Biodistribution and biosafety of GO: future challenges
The focus of this review is the GO interaction with blood components and BC in light of the future design of GO pharmaceutical delivery systems. Intravenously injected drug delivery systems (DDS) developed so far include PEGylated nanographene sheets for tumor passive targeting, rGO functionalized with chitosan and iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles for the delivery of doxorubicin and epidermal growth factor receptor antibody-conjugated PEGylated nanographene oxide for epirubicin delivery in tumors.
Nanoparticles intended for drug delivery applications are being engineered to reduce their clearance and extend systemic circulation times and thus increase the opportunity for targeted delivery. However, the disadvantage of prolonged circulation times is the greater chance of interaction with blood components and activation of adverse effects.
Before any nanomaterial translation into clinical therapy, there are biosafety concerns that need to be addressed. We have seen how GO interacts with blood system components and how BC can influence these interactions, but what is the biodistribution and the toxicity when GO is administered intravenously"
"The early study of Zhang and colleagues determined the distribution and biocompatibility of i.v. injected GO in mice. The half-life of GO in blood is much longer than in other carbon nanomaterials (B5 hours). Within 48 hours after i.v. injection, GO is cleared from the bloodstream and distributed throughout various organs with preferred accumulation in the lungs, liver, and spleen. The lack of pathological changes was reported after 14 days of treatment at a low dose (1 mg kg1), Fig. 5 Illustration of the short-term effects of GONPs and rGONPs on THP-1 cells, and the long-term effects on THP-1a differentiation from THP-1 cells. GONPs and rGONPs could have induced ROS formation and activated the NF-kB pathway in THP-1 cells. rGONPs could not fully transcript proinflammatory genes due to lack of additional transcription factors but at a higher dose (10 mg kg1), granulomatous lesions, pulmonary edema, inflammatory cell infiltration, and fibrosis throughout the lung were observed. Many studies confirmed that the primary site of GO accumulation and toxicity in vivo is the lungs. It seems that the pathological effects on the lungs are proportional to the degree of dispersion and oxidation of GO."
"A systematic study on GO size, dose and dosing frequency was conducted by Liu and colleagues. Liu intravenously administered two types of GO: small GO flakes (s-GO, average hydrodynamic diameter of B250 nm) and large GO flakes (l-GO, average hydrodynamic diameter of B900 nm) at a single high dose (2.1 mg kg1) or seven repeated low doses (0.3 mg kg1); irrespective of size, the single high-dose administration of GO induced lung damage and infiltration of inflammatory cells. In the lungs, GO accumulated in the macrophages but not in the lymphocytes, which were recruited but were not able to trap GO. In this study, the authors claimed that although oxidative stress is a widely existent phenomenon in cells exposed in vitro to GO, the protective effect of proteins forming a BC around GO should be considered in vivo.
Interesting size-dependent results were reported for multipledose exposure. The s-GO did not induce renal damage or accumulate in the kidneys since it was quickly eliminated through the glomeruli. Conversely, l-GO failed to be cleared through kidneys and induced damage. The lungs were damaged only after multiple doses of l-GO. This effect depends on the aggregation of GO with proteins that induce the blockage of large GO-complexes in the lungs. The hypothesis relies on the formation of multiple complexes of l-GO and proteins that enter the capillaries and create multiple injury points and inflammatory cell recruitment. s-GO could instead pass through lungs capillaries after each low-dose administration. The kidneys and lungs were more damaged by l-GO, while the s-GO preferentially accumulated in the liver with toxic effects.
At a high single dose, s-GO can also damage the lungs since at high concentration it forms large complexes that reach a similar size to the l-GO protein complex"
"Finally, the degradation of injected GO is an important biosafety concern. Long-term interaction (14 days) of GO with plasma causes reduction and biodegradation with hole formation caused by the action of hydroxyl radicals. Once internalized by the immune cells, biodegradable particles are digested and cleared from the body, while non-biodegradable particles accumulate in cells for extended periods."
A major public health guide on bioethics written by psychopaths. They call their governance style, "good stewardship." This was written in 2007, is a resource used by public policy planners and leaders internationally. The self-important, self-congratulatory aggrandizement full of contradictions and inconsistencies on full display. 200+ pages of psychopathic mental masturbation. A fascinating insight to their minds, helping to understand how they've come to believe their own BS.
As to your draft piece, I question the 10% of psychopaths being women assertion. It seems like women have been some of the worst tyrants during the pandemic, leaders in New Zealand, Germany, Iceland, Finland, Birx, UK's SPI-B Pandemic team leader, governors of New York, Michigan, Teacher's unions, on medical boards, nursing boards, you name it. The "Karen" phenomenom in supermarkets and stores, airline personnel. Far more than 10% of women have been the heavy-handed rulemakers and enforcers, a trait I associate with psychopaths and those with high psychopath tendencies. I need to be convinced by data that credibly refutes my lived experiences.
This is a poorly studied area of a phenomenon that is covert, so who knows? The 10 percent was not my figure, see references. My (admittedly questionable) theory is that more women may be low grade psychopaths. I do know about the Karens, however. These are largely people having a bad day and driven temporarily crazy by low hormones. Remember that I have all that experience prescribing them. The premenstrual syndrome is lack of progesterone, and post menopausal this is typically the first hormone level to fall. See my book Hormone Secrets for backing for these ideas.
If we're just spitballing, I'll offer the possibility that there's a bit of a chip on their shoulder phenomenon at play. A lifetime of not being taken seriously by men in power, feelings of being talked down to, "man-splaining." So they're overcompensating for those perceived slights to their authority that defiance represents. "I'll show you who's boss now!" It's a relative of Napoleon complex attributed to short men people in power.
Authoritarianism is actually a signal for weak leadership. When people trust that their leaders are competent and looking out for them they follow their direction willingly. That's strong leadership. Harsh rules are imposed by weak leaders who the people do not trust and must be forced to obey.
I'm from New Zealand, and can say that we were all enamored and felt pride at our leader when the world sang praises of her leadership during 2020-21. Now many are disillusioned, though still far too many remain sympathetic. There is definitely a mystifying allure that the general population gets swept away by. Perhaps partly because they are women, we look to them almost as if they were are mothers to take care of us. . . I am only at the beginning of trying to learn about psychopathic tendencies. The idea is all so new to me. . .
So when do we see arrests, trials, and public hangings, because these people deserve the full impact of the Nuremberg Code, and Helsinki Accords? They do not deserve to walk off with their ill gotten gains, or MASS MURDER, Torture, Crippling people, JOB LOSSES DUE TO DISEASES these vaccines caused, Mental Torture of families, DESTROYING MULTIPLE ECONOMIES WHERE PEOPLE WILL DIE OF FAMINE!
Not a Coincidence: Fauci Flees Before the Midterms
Their 10 yr timeline would put him at death's door. While Biden is still pushing jabs on TV ads, AARP too. Get it when you get your killer flu shot.
https://www.clayandbuck.com/not-a-coincidence-fauci-flees-before-the-midterms/
https://nypost.com/2022/08/23/good-riddance-to-fauci-and-his-calamitous-costly-career/
RFK is very brave, persistent
Thanks for this link, Dr Yoho!
Here is a study from 2018 of graphene used in experiments for vaccines. Identifying known hazards of the substance in vaccines. Just two years before implemented into the experimental jabs sold as, "safe and effective." Do you really think they solved all of the known problems with it in just two short years? Looking at the known hazards presented in this study it sure looks like they didn't. This study is a smoking gun that they knew what they were doing to us. And did it anyways. Which makes them evil, not just mistakenly hopeful.
Because of its properties graphene is able to increase the uptake of a substance into the body. It penetrates blood cells to deliver the drug inside, evade a cell's defenses. It can also be delivered directly to an organ inside the body which acts as a magnet to attract more graphene and build scaffolding there for implants to be created, allowing for novel targeted treatments. But this isn't done without risk of injury. They have been experimenting with ways to use the best properties of graphene for increased pharmaceutical uptake without inducing known injury. They try different coatings to prevent injury, but the coatings make graphene less effective, they pass through the system faster without as much uptake.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328338305_Graphene_Oxide_Touches_Blood_In_Vivo_Interactions_of_Bio-Coronated_2D_Materials
"Due to the sharp edges of GO and rGO, hemolytic effects might be expected in vivo, possibly caused by nanomaterial blades disrupting cell membranes, as reported for GO interactions with bacteria.
Feng and colleagues discovered RBC morphological alterations and aggregation above 100 mg mL1 and hemolytic effects above 10 mg mL1 reaching 96% at 500 mg mL1. Lower hemolytic concentrations have been reported by other groups. Small GO flakes (few hundreds of nm) seem to be more destructive."
"Hemostasis cascade prevents blood loss from injured tissue and maintains blood fluidity. The final hemostasis is driven by platelets, which form the clot, a mixture of red blood cells, aggregated platelets, fibrin and other cellular elements (Fig. 3-2b). If the clot forms abnormally, it can induce thrombosis.
Thrombogenicity is an important feature evaluated in nanomaterial design for in vivo delivery and represents the propensity to induce blood clotting and induce occlusion of a blood vessel by a thrombus."
"Furthermore, nanoparticles engineered to have longer systemic circulation times increase the likelihood of contact with blood components including the coagulation system, with thrombogenicity risks."
"When administered in vivo (250 mg kg1 body weight), 48% of lung vessels were partially occluded after 15 minutes"
"Biodistribution and biosafety of GO: future challenges
The focus of this review is the GO interaction with blood components and BC in light of the future design of GO pharmaceutical delivery systems. Intravenously injected drug delivery systems (DDS) developed so far include PEGylated nanographene sheets for tumor passive targeting, rGO functionalized with chitosan and iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles for the delivery of doxorubicin and epidermal growth factor receptor antibody-conjugated PEGylated nanographene oxide for epirubicin delivery in tumors.
Nanoparticles intended for drug delivery applications are being engineered to reduce their clearance and extend systemic circulation times and thus increase the opportunity for targeted delivery. However, the disadvantage of prolonged circulation times is the greater chance of interaction with blood components and activation of adverse effects.
Before any nanomaterial translation into clinical therapy, there are biosafety concerns that need to be addressed. We have seen how GO interacts with blood system components and how BC can influence these interactions, but what is the biodistribution and the toxicity when GO is administered intravenously"
"The early study of Zhang and colleagues determined the distribution and biocompatibility of i.v. injected GO in mice. The half-life of GO in blood is much longer than in other carbon nanomaterials (B5 hours). Within 48 hours after i.v. injection, GO is cleared from the bloodstream and distributed throughout various organs with preferred accumulation in the lungs, liver, and spleen. The lack of pathological changes was reported after 14 days of treatment at a low dose (1 mg kg1), Fig. 5 Illustration of the short-term effects of GONPs and rGONPs on THP-1 cells, and the long-term effects on THP-1a differentiation from THP-1 cells. GONPs and rGONPs could have induced ROS formation and activated the NF-kB pathway in THP-1 cells. rGONPs could not fully transcript proinflammatory genes due to lack of additional transcription factors but at a higher dose (10 mg kg1), granulomatous lesions, pulmonary edema, inflammatory cell infiltration, and fibrosis throughout the lung were observed. Many studies confirmed that the primary site of GO accumulation and toxicity in vivo is the lungs. It seems that the pathological effects on the lungs are proportional to the degree of dispersion and oxidation of GO."
"A systematic study on GO size, dose and dosing frequency was conducted by Liu and colleagues. Liu intravenously administered two types of GO: small GO flakes (s-GO, average hydrodynamic diameter of B250 nm) and large GO flakes (l-GO, average hydrodynamic diameter of B900 nm) at a single high dose (2.1 mg kg1) or seven repeated low doses (0.3 mg kg1); irrespective of size, the single high-dose administration of GO induced lung damage and infiltration of inflammatory cells. In the lungs, GO accumulated in the macrophages but not in the lymphocytes, which were recruited but were not able to trap GO. In this study, the authors claimed that although oxidative stress is a widely existent phenomenon in cells exposed in vitro to GO, the protective effect of proteins forming a BC around GO should be considered in vivo.
Interesting size-dependent results were reported for multipledose exposure. The s-GO did not induce renal damage or accumulate in the kidneys since it was quickly eliminated through the glomeruli. Conversely, l-GO failed to be cleared through kidneys and induced damage. The lungs were damaged only after multiple doses of l-GO. This effect depends on the aggregation of GO with proteins that induce the blockage of large GO-complexes in the lungs. The hypothesis relies on the formation of multiple complexes of l-GO and proteins that enter the capillaries and create multiple injury points and inflammatory cell recruitment. s-GO could instead pass through lungs capillaries after each low-dose administration. The kidneys and lungs were more damaged by l-GO, while the s-GO preferentially accumulated in the liver with toxic effects.
At a high single dose, s-GO can also damage the lungs since at high concentration it forms large complexes that reach a similar size to the l-GO protein complex"
"Finally, the degradation of injected GO is an important biosafety concern. Long-term interaction (14 days) of GO with plasma causes reduction and biodegradation with hole formation caused by the action of hydroxyl radicals. Once internalized by the immune cells, biodegradable particles are digested and cleared from the body, while non-biodegradable particles accumulate in cells for extended periods."
they are psychopaths. To learn more about this species, see this draft post: https://robertyoho.substack.com/p/ad409d5d-db8b-476f-acce-f9e521b3aa7d
It's so good to see it written by another human being: they are psychopaths.
Most dont see it, nobody in my circles, so I am very grateful for 3 words
A major public health guide on bioethics written by psychopaths. They call their governance style, "good stewardship." This was written in 2007, is a resource used by public policy planners and leaders internationally. The self-important, self-congratulatory aggrandizement full of contradictions and inconsistencies on full display. 200+ pages of psychopathic mental masturbation. A fascinating insight to their minds, helping to understand how they've come to believe their own BS.
Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 2007
https://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Public-health-ethical-issues.pdf
As to your draft piece, I question the 10% of psychopaths being women assertion. It seems like women have been some of the worst tyrants during the pandemic, leaders in New Zealand, Germany, Iceland, Finland, Birx, UK's SPI-B Pandemic team leader, governors of New York, Michigan, Teacher's unions, on medical boards, nursing boards, you name it. The "Karen" phenomenom in supermarkets and stores, airline personnel. Far more than 10% of women have been the heavy-handed rulemakers and enforcers, a trait I associate with psychopaths and those with high psychopath tendencies. I need to be convinced by data that credibly refutes my lived experiences.
This is a poorly studied area of a phenomenon that is covert, so who knows? The 10 percent was not my figure, see references. My (admittedly questionable) theory is that more women may be low grade psychopaths. I do know about the Karens, however. These are largely people having a bad day and driven temporarily crazy by low hormones. Remember that I have all that experience prescribing them. The premenstrual syndrome is lack of progesterone, and post menopausal this is typically the first hormone level to fall. See my book Hormone Secrets for backing for these ideas.
Any info. recommended for post-menopausal women with break through bleeding post jab. Thanks.
Here’s a way to download my hormone book free https://bookhip.com/JHPTVTG
Read the chapter about that
And Subscribe to robertyoho.substack.com
Thank you so much.
If we're just spitballing, I'll offer the possibility that there's a bit of a chip on their shoulder phenomenon at play. A lifetime of not being taken seriously by men in power, feelings of being talked down to, "man-splaining." So they're overcompensating for those perceived slights to their authority that defiance represents. "I'll show you who's boss now!" It's a relative of Napoleon complex attributed to short men people in power.
Authoritarianism is actually a signal for weak leadership. When people trust that their leaders are competent and looking out for them they follow their direction willingly. That's strong leadership. Harsh rules are imposed by weak leaders who the people do not trust and must be forced to obey.
I'm from New Zealand, and can say that we were all enamored and felt pride at our leader when the world sang praises of her leadership during 2020-21. Now many are disillusioned, though still far too many remain sympathetic. There is definitely a mystifying allure that the general population gets swept away by. Perhaps partly because they are women, we look to them almost as if they were are mothers to take care of us. . . I am only at the beginning of trying to learn about psychopathic tendencies. The idea is all so new to me. . .
Ardern like Macron, Trudeau, they were brainwashed by the WEF and/or made promises which appealed to their delusions of grandeur.
Here’s a draft preview post https://robertyoho.substack.com/p/ad409d5d-db8b-476f-acce-f9e521b3aa7d
So when do we see arrests, trials, and public hangings, because these people deserve the full impact of the Nuremberg Code, and Helsinki Accords? They do not deserve to walk off with their ill gotten gains, or MASS MURDER, Torture, Crippling people, JOB LOSSES DUE TO DISEASES these vaccines caused, Mental Torture of families, DESTROYING MULTIPLE ECONOMIES WHERE PEOPLE WILL DIE OF FAMINE!
Can you possibly give the short version bc I WOULD LIKE TO LISTEN BUT NO TIME TO DO SO?
Try double speed